Skip to main content

Incorporating Syllable Phonotactics to Improve Grapheme to Phoneme Translation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Future and Emerging Trends in Language Technology. Machine Learning and Big Data (FETLT 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10341))

  • 1357 Accesses

Abstract

Grapheme to Phoneme (G2P) translation is a critical step in many natural language tasks such as text-to-speech production and automatic speech recognition. Most approaches to the G2P problem ignore phonotactical constraints and syllable structure information, and they rely on simple letter window features to produce pronunciations of words. We present a G2P translator which incorporates syllable structure into the prediction pipeline during structured prediction and re-ranking. In addition, most dictionaries contain only word-to-pronunciation pairs, which is a problem when trying to use these dictionaries as training data in a structured prediction approach to G2P translation. We present a number of improvements to the process of producing high-quality alignments of these pairs for training data. Together these two contributions improve the G2P word error rate (WER) on the CMUDict dataset by ~8%, achieving a new state-of-the-art accuracy level among open-source solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ash, S., Lin, D.: Grapheme to phoneme translation using conditional random fields with re-ranking. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds.) TSD 2016. LNCS, vol. 9924, pp. 314–325. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45510-5_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., Gulikers, L.: Celex2. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bisani, M., Ney, H.: Joint-sequence models for grapheme-to-phoneme conversion. Speech Commun. 50(5), 434–451 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deligne, S., Yvon, F., Bimbot, F.: Variable-length sequence matching for phonetic transcription using joint multigrams. In: 4th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Demberg, V., Schmid, H., Möhler, G.: Phonological constraints and morphological preprocessing for grapheme-to-phoneme conversion. In: Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 45, p. 96 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eger, S.: Do we need bigram alignment models? On the effect of alignment quality on transduction accuracy in G2P. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, vol. 18, pp. 127–136 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greg Fast. Lingua-en-syllable (1999). http://search.cpan.org/gregfast/Lingua-EN-Syllable-0.251

  8. Kheang, S., Katsurada, K., Iribe, Y., Nitta, T.: Solving the phoneme conflict in grapheme-to-phoneme conversion using a two-stage neural network-based approach. IEICE Trans. Inform. Syst. 97(4), 901–910 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dennis, H.: Klatt. Review of the arpa speech understanding project. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62(6), 1345–1366 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kubo, K., Kawanami, H., Saruwatari, H., Shikano, K.: Unconstrained many-to-many alignment for automatic pronunciation annotation. In: Proceedings of the APSIPA, pp. 1–4 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lafferty, J., McCallum, A., Pereira, F.: Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data, pp. 282–289 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McCallum, A.K.: Mallet: A machine learning for language toolkit (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Novak, J.R., Minematsu, N., Hirose, K.: WFST-based grapheme-to-phoneme conversion: open source tools for alignment, model-building and decoding. In: 10th International Workshop on Finite State Methods and Natural Language Processing, p. 45 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Novak, J.R., Minematsu, N., Hirose, K., Hori, C., Kashioka, H., Dixon, P.R.: Improving WFST-based G2P conversion with alignment constraints and RNNLM n-best rescoring. In: Interspeech (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rao, K., Peng, F., Sak, H., Beaufays, F.: Grapheme-to-phoneme conversion using long short-term memory recurrent neural networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, D., King, S.: Letter-to-sound pronunciation prediction using conditional random fields. IEEE Sig. Process. Lett. 18(2), 122–125 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, X., Sim, K.C.: Integrating conditional random fields and joint multi-gram model with syllabic features for grapheme-to-phone conversion. In: Interspeech, pp. 2321–2325 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weide, R.: The CMU pronunciation dictionary, release 0.7a (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, K., Allauzen, C., Hall, K., Riley, M., Roark, B.: Encoding linear models as weighted finite-state transducers. In: Interspeech (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Ash .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ash, S., Lin, D. (2017). Incorporating Syllable Phonotactics to Improve Grapheme to Phoneme Translation. In: Quesada, J., Martín Mateos , FJ., López Soto, T. (eds) Future and Emerging Trends in Language Technology. Machine Learning and Big Data. FETLT 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10341. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69365-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69365-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69364-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69365-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics