Abstract
Traditionally the process of mine development, pit design and long-term scheduling is based on a single deterministic orebody model built by the interpolation of drill hole data using some form of spatial interpolation procedure, e.g. kriging. Typical steps in mine design would include the determination of the ultimate pit, the development of a number of mining phases (pushbacks) and then the development of a life-of-mine schedule. All of these steps would have the aim of maximising the mine’s net present value (NPV), along with meeting numerous other business and physical constraints. There are a number of software packages commercially available and widely used in the mining industry that deal with some or all of these issues. The methods employed by all of these packages treat the process described above in a strictly deterministic way. In reality, given the sparse drill hole data, there is usually significant and variable uncertainty associated with a single or unique deterministic block model. This uncertainty is not captured or used in the planning process. This paper describes work undertaken by the Exploration and Mining Technology Group within BHP Billiton to develop a new mathematical algorithm for mine optimisation under orebody uncertainty. This uncertainty is expressed as a number of conditionally simulated orebody models. This optimisation algorithm is implemented in a new software package. The software uses a number of proprietary algorithms along with the commercially available mixed integer-programming package ILOG CPLEX. The development targets all phases of mine optimisation, including the NPV optimal block extraction sequence, pushback design, and simultaneous cut-off grade and mining schedule optimisation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Caccetta L, Hill SP (2003) An application of branch and cut to open pit mine scheduling. J Global Optim 27(2–3):349–365
Dimitrakopoulos R (1998) Conditional simulation algorithms for modeling orebody uncertainty in open pit optimization. Int J Surf Min 12(4):173–179
Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) Applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, p 561
Jewbali A (2006) Modelling geological uncertainty for stochastic short-term production scheduling in open pit metal mines. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Queensland, Australia, p 280
Lane KF (1988) The economic definition of ore. Mining Journal Books Ltd., London, p 147
Lerchs H, Grossmann L (1965) Optimum design of open-pit mines. Trans CIM, LXVII, pp 17–24
Padberg MW (1995) Linear optimization and extensions. New York, Springer, p 449
Ramazan S (2007) Large-scale production scheduling with the fundamental tree algorithm—model, case study and comparisons. In: Dimitrakopoulos R (ed) Orebody modelling and strategic mine planning, 2nd edn. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, pp 121–127
Ramazan S, Dimitrakopoulos R (2018) Stochastic optimisation of long-term production scheduling for open pit mines with a new integer programming formulation. (in this volume)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Menabde, M., Froyland, G., Stone, P., Yeates, G.A. (2018). Mining Schedule Optimisation for Conditionally Simulated Orebodies. In: Dimitrakopoulos, R. (eds) Advances in Applied Strategic Mine Planning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69320-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69320-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69319-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69320-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)