Abstract
Geometallurgical parameters are descriptions of the mineralogy and microstructure of the ore determining its mineralogical and microstructural characteristics. From a conditional geostatistical simulation of such properties, a processing model can compute recovery, equipment usage, processing costs, and thus the monetary value for mining and processing a block with certain processing parameters. The output can be used for optimising mining sequences or finding optimal processing parameters by solving the corresponding stochastic optimisation problem. The approach requires two properties of the simulation not provided by established geostatistical techniques:
-
(1)
Many relevant geometallurgical parameters are from non-Euclidean statistical scales such as (mineral) compositions, (grain size) distribution, (grain) geometry, and (stratigraphic type) categorical which might produce nonsensical values (for example, negative proportions, negative facies probabilities, planar grains) when simulated with standard geostatistical techniques.
-
(2)
Due to the nonlinearity of processing, the entire conditional distribution of the geometallurgical parameters is relevant, not only its mean and variance. The geostatistical simulation needs to reproduce the joint conditional distributions of all the geometallurgical parameters.
The multi-point conditional geostatistical simulation technique discussed here allows for jointly simulating dependent spatial variables from various sample spaces. The technique combines an infill simulation, similar to the one used in multi-point geostatistics (MPS), with a new form of distributional regression to estimate conditional distributions of arbitrary scales from different information sources, including training images, training models and observed data. The distributional regression is based on a generalisation of logistic regression and is related to both Bayesian Maximum Entropy (BME) geostatistics and high order cumulants. The method ensures that simulated data reside in the set of possible values and honour the characteristics of the joint distribution to be reproduced. The computational effort is substantial, but affordable for a useful application with standard problems: from processing-aware block value prediction and block processing optimisation as shown in the test application to a mathematically completely defined simulated model situation with a complex processing model.
Keywords
- Sequential Mining Optimization
- Bayesian Maximum Entropy
- Geostatistical Simulation
- Training Images
- Joint Conditional Distribution
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aitchison J (1986) The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman & Hall Ltd, London
Egozcue JJ, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Mateu-Figueras G, Barceló-Vidal C (2003) Isometric logratio transformations for compositional data analysis. Math Geol 35(3):279–300
Egozcue JJ, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Tolosana-Delgado R, Ortego MI, van den Boogaart KG (2013) Bayes spaces: use of improper distributions and exponential families. Rev de la Real Acad de Cienc Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Serie A Matemáticas 107:475–486
Markwell T (2001) Murrin Murrin Ni/Co resource estimation: MME resource modelling report. Anaconda
Mueller U, Tolosana-Delgado R, van den Boogaart KG (2014) Simulation of compositional data: a Nickel-Laterite case study. In: Dimitrakopoulos R (ed) Orebody modelling and strategic mine planning, symposium, Perth, WA, 24–26 Nov 2014. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, pp 61–72
Stein A, Corsten LCA (1991) Universal kriging and cokriging as a regression procedure. Biometrics 47(2), pp 575–587
Stien M, Kolbjørnsen O (2011) Facies modelling using a Markov mesh model specification. Math Geosci 43:611–624
Strebelle S (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math Geol 34:1–21
van den Boogaart KG, Tolosana-Delgado R (2008) “Compositions”: a unified R package to analyze compositional data. Comput Geosci 34(4):320–338
van den Boogaart KG, Konsulke S, Tolosana Delgado R (2013a) The challanges of adaptive processing to geostatistical prediction, 23rd world mining congress, 11. 15 Aug 2013, Montreal, Canada
van den Boogaart KG, Konsulke S, Tolosana-Delgado R (2013b) Nonlinear geostatistics for geometallurgical optimisation, GeoMet 2013. In: Proceedings of the second AusIMM international geometallurgy conference, 30 Sept–2 Oct
van den Boogaart KG, Egozcue JJ, Pawlowsky-Glahn V (2014) Bayes Hilbert spaces. Austr N Z J Stat 56:171–194
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van den Boogaart, K.G., Tolosana-Delgado, R., Lehmann, M., Mueller, U. (2018). On the Joint Multi Point Simulation of Discrete and Continuous Geometallurgical Parameters. In: Dimitrakopoulos, R. (eds) Advances in Applied Strategic Mine Planning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69320-0_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69320-0_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69319-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69320-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)
