Advertisement

Solving a Large SIP Model for Production Scheduling at a Gold Mine with Multiple Processing Streams and Uncertain Geology

  • M. de Freitas SilvaEmail author
Chapter
  • 991 Downloads

Abstract

One of the main steps during the decision-making process of long-term mine planning is the definition of the optimal sequence of extraction, which usually is synonymous of maximizing the discounted cash flow of the project subjected to several constraints arising from aspects of technical, physical, and economic limits. The Open-Pit Mine Production Scheduling (OPMPS) comprises several intricacies related to its size and uncertainty of input parameters. Due to its complexity and prohibitive size, traditional mine planning usually relies on heuristic or metaheuristic methodologies which are able to provide good solutions in a reasonable amount of time. However, most of the uncertainty that surrounds the mining complex is ignored leading to non-realistic results. In this paper, a new heuristic approach is explored in order to solve a stochastic version of the OPMPS problem accounting for geological uncertainty in terms of metal content, multiple processing streams, and stockpiling option. The methodology involves generating an initial solution by solving a series of sub-problems and this initial solution is improved using a network-flow based algorithm. The algorithm was applied to a relatively large gold deposit with more than 119 thousands blocks. Results have shown that the methodology is promising to deal with large-size mine instances in reasonable time.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work in this paper was funded from the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Collaborative R&D Grant CRDPJ 411270-10 with AngloGold Ashanti, Barrick Gold, BHP Billiton, De Beers, Newmont Mining, and Vale. A special thanks to McGill’s COSMO Stochastic Mine Planning Laboratory and Professor Roussos Dimitrakopoulos for all the support and guidance.

References

  1. Ahuja K, Ergun Ö, Orlin B, Punnen P (2002) A survey of very large-scale neighborhood search techniques. Discrete Appl Math 123(1):75–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albor F, Dimitrakopoulos R (2009) Stochastic mine design optimisation based on simulated annealing: pit limits, production schedules, multiple orebody scenarios and sensitivity analysis. Min Technol (Trans Inst Min Metall A) 118(2):A80–A91Google Scholar
  3. Benndorf J, Dimitrakopoulos R (2013) Stochastic long-term production scheduling of iron ore deposits: integrating joint multi-element geological uncertainty. J Min Sci 49(1):68–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boland N, Dumitrescu I, Froyland G (2008) A multistage stochastic programming approach to open pitmine production scheduling with uncertain geology. Optim Online. [online]. Available from: www.optimizationonline.org/DBHTML/2008/10/2123.html
  5. Caccetta L, Hill SP (2003) An application of branch and cut to open pit mine scheduling. J Global Optim 27(2–3):349–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dagdelen K, Johnson TB (1986) Optimum open pit mine production scheduling by lagrangian parameterization. In: Proceedings 19th APCOM symposium of the society of mining engineers, AIME, New York, pp 127–142Google Scholar
  7. David M (1988) Handbook of applied advanced geostatistical ore reserve estimation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 232Google Scholar
  8. Dimitrakopoulos R, Ramazan S (2008) Stochastic integer programming for optimizing long-term production schedules of open pit mines: methods, application and value of stochastic solutions. Min Technol (Trans Inst Min Metall A) 117(4):155–160Google Scholar
  9. Dimitrakopoulos R, Jewbali A (2013) Joint stochastic optimization of short- and long- term mine production planning: method and application in a large operating gold mine. Min Technol (Trans Inst Min Metall A) 122(2):110–123Google Scholar
  10. Dimitrakopoulos R, Farrelly CT, Godoy M (2002) Moving forward from traditional optimization: grade uncertainty and risk effects in open pit design. Min Technol (Trans Inst Min Metall A) 111(1):82–88Google Scholar
  11. Dowd P (1994) Risk assessment in reserve estimation and open pit planning. Min Technol (Trans Inst Min Metall A) 103:148–154Google Scholar
  12. Dowd P (1997) Risk in minerals projects: analysis, perception and management. Min Technol (Trans Inst Min Metall A) 106:9–18Google Scholar
  13. Gershon M (1983) Optimal mine production scheduling: evaluation of large scale mathematical programming approaches. Geotech Geol Eng 1(4):315–329Google Scholar
  14. Gershon M (1987) Heuristic approaches for mine planning and production scheduling. Int J Min Geol Eng 5(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Godoy M (2002) The effective management of geological risk in long-term production scheduling of open pit mines, Ph.D. thesis (unpublished), University of Queensland, Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  16. Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York, p 496Google Scholar
  17. Hustrulid WA, Kuchta M (2006) Open pit mine planning & design. Taylor and Francis, London, p 991Google Scholar
  18. ILOG (2008) ILOG CPLEX 11.2 user’s manual. IBM, ArmonkGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson T (1969) Optimum production scheduling. In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on computers and operations research, Salt Lake City, pp 539–562Google Scholar
  20. Lamghari A, Dimitrakopoulos R (2012) A diversified tabu search approach for the open-pit mine production scheduling problem with metal uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 222:642–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lamghari A, Dimitrakopoulos R (2013) A network-flow based algorithm for scheduling production in multi-processor open pit mines accounting for metal uncertainty. [online]. Available from: www.gerad.ca/fichiers/cahiers/G-2013-63.pdf [Accessed 1 April 2014]
  22. Lamghari A, Dimitrakopoulos R, Ferland J (2013) A variable neighborhood descent algorithm for the open-pit mine production scheduling problem with metal uncertainty. J Oper Res Soc. doi: 10.1057/jors.2013.81 Google Scholar
  23. Leite A (2008) Application of stochastic mine design and optimization methods, M Eng Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  24. Leite A, Dimitrakopoulos R (2007) Stochastic optimization model for open pit mine planning: application and risk analysis at a copper deposit. Min Technol (Trans Inst Min Metall A) 116(3):109–118Google Scholar
  25. Leite A, Dimitrakopoulos R (2014) Mine scheduling with stochastic programming in a copper deposit; Application and value of the stochastic solution. J Min Sci Technol 24(6):755–762Google Scholar
  26. Menabde M, Froyland G, Stone P, Yeates G (2018) Mining schedule optimisation for conditionally simulated orebodies, in this VolumeGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramazan S, Dimitrakopoulos R (2004) Traditional and new MIP models for production scheduling with in-situ grade variability. Int J Surf Min Reclam Environ 18(2):85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ramazan S, Dimitrakopoulos R (2013) Production scheduling with uncertain supply: a new solution to the open pit mining problem. Optim Eng 14(2):361–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ravenscroft P (1992) Risk analysis for mine scheduling by conditional simulation. Min Technol (Trans Inst Min Metall A) 101:104–108Google Scholar
  30. Sarker RA, Gunn EA (1997) A simple SLP algorithm for solving a class of nonlinear programs. Eur J Oper Res 101(1):140–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tolwinski B, Underwood R (1996) A scheduling algorithm for open pit mines. IMA J Math Appl Bus Ind 7:247–270Google Scholar
  32. Whittle J (1988) Beyond optimisation in open pit design. In: Fytas K (ed) Proceedings computer applications in the mineral industries, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 331–337Google Scholar
  33. Wolsey LA (1998) Integer programming. Wiley, New York, p 288Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vale SABelo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations