Abstract
When the city of Ludwigsburg in Germany experimented with the transition management approach, it had already formulated ambitious sustainability strategies and programmes, institutionalised sustainability in a cross-sectional city department and established a variety of participatory processes to collect citizen input for strategic planning. In this chapter, we reflect on the transition management process in Ludwigsburg and its results against the backdrop of how ‘ideal-type’ transition management got mediated in a context with well-developed sustainability strategies and participatory planning processes. The case of transition management in Ludwigsburg reveals several issues that relate to a questioning of the distinctiveness of transition management as co-creation process, its ‘added value’ and its fit with existing policies and planning processes. The process outcomes might be an indication of challenges in that regard: the results were treated as ‘input’ to the city government’s plans, were not able to inspire ‘transformative’ thinking, did not result in concrete actions and, finally, roles and relationships of the city government vis-à-vis the citizens were largely re-confirmed. Nevertheless, the results do include new ideas about the future of Ludwigsburg, build on a systemic perspective and the experience with the new methodology triggered the involved policy officers to reflect on the city government’s current inflexible and narrow approaches to participation in city planning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Avelino F (2009) Empowerment and the challenge of applying transition management to ongoing projects. Policy Sci 42:369–390
Avelino F (2011) Power in transition. Empowering discourses on sustainability transitions. PhD thesis. Erasmus University of Rotterdam
City of Ludwigsburg (2006) City development concept. Shaping the future of our town together. Ludwigsburg
Faber J (2012) Ludwig und Ludwiga: Visionen und Wege. Wie schaffen die Energiewende in Ludwigsburg. Ein Besuch im Jahr 2050, presentation to the Lord Mayor, June 1, 2012, Ludwigsburg
Frantzeskaki N, Loorbach D, Meadowcroft J (2012) Governing societal transitions to sustainability. Int J Sustain Dev 15(1):19–36
Frantzeskaki N, Hölscher K, Bach M, Avelino F (2016) Introduction to sustainability transitions thinking. In: Frantzeskaki N, Hölscher K, Bach M, Avelino F (eds) Co-creating sustainable urban futures. A primer on applying transition management in cities. Springer, Tokyo
Hölscher K (2013) Seeds of change? Evaluating the transition arena for urban climate governance in Gent and Ludwigsburg. Master thesis. Utrecht University
Hölscher K, Avelino F, Wittmayer J (2016a) Empowering actors in transition management in and for cities. Understanding different roles in urban sustainability transitions. In: Frantzeskaki N, Hölscher K, Bach M, Avelino F (eds) Co-creating sustainable urban futures. A primer on applying transition management in cities. Springer, Tokyo
Hölscher K, Roorda C, Nevens F (2016b) Ghent: fostering a climate for transition. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer JM, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions. European and Asian experiences. Springer, Tokyo, pp 91–112
Hölscher K, Wittmayer J, Avelino F (2017) Opening up the transition arena: an analysis of (dis)empowerment of civil society actors in transition management in cities. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. Corrected Proof. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.004
IER, Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung (2011) Integriertes Klimaschutz- und Energiekonzept für Ludwigsburg. Ludwigsburg
Krauz A (2016) Transition management in Montreuil: towards perspectives of hybridisation between ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ transitions. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer J, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions. European and Asian experiences. Springer, Tokyo, pp 133–152
Loorbach D (2010) Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23(1):161–183
Loorbach D, Frantzeskaki N, Thissen WH (2011) A transition research perspective on governance for sustainability. In: Jaeger CC, Tàbara JD, Jäger J (eds) European research on sustainable development, volume 1: transformative science approaches for sustainability. Springer, Berlin, pp 73–90
Nevens F, Roorda C (2013) A climate of change: a transition approach for climate neutrality in the city of Ghent (Belgium). Sustain Cities Soc 10:112–121
Randolph WA (2000) Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: toward a theory for community psychology. Am J Community Psychol 15(2):121–148
Roorda C, Wittmayer J (2014) Transition management in five European cities – an evaluation, DRIFT, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam
Roorda C, Wittmayer J, Henneman P, Van Steenbergen F, Frantzeskaki N, Loorbach D (2014) Transition management in the urban context. Guidance manual. Drift, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam
Wittmayer JM (2016) Insights and lessons for the governance of urban sustainability transitions. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer J, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions. European and Asian experiences. Springer, Tokyo, pp 157–173
Wittmayer JM (2016) Transition management, action research and actor roles: understanding local sustainability transitions. PhD thesis. Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Wittmayer JM, Loorbach D (2016) Governing transitions in cities: fostering alternative ideas, practices, and social relations through transition management. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer J, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions. European and Asian experiences. Springer, Tokyo, pp 13–32
Wittmayer JM, Schäpke N (2014) Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. Sustain Sci 9(4):483–496
Wittmayer J, Frantzeskaki N, van Steenbergen F, Roorda C, Henneman P (2012) Introducing a profile for urban change agents: experiences from five European cities, Drift Working Paper. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Creative Commons, Rotterdam
Wittmayer J, Roorda C, Van Steenbergen F (eds) (2014) Governing urban sustainability transitions – inspiring examples. DRIFT, Rotterdam. 10.13140/RG.2.1.2367.7606
Wittmayer JM, van Steenbergen F, Rok A, Roorda C (2015) Governing sustainability: a dialogue between local agenda 21 and transition management. Local Environ: Int J Justice Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2015.1050658
Wittmayer J, van Steenbergen F, Frantzeskaki N, Bach M (2016) Transition management in urban context. In: Frantzeskaki N, Hölscher K, Bach M, Avelino F (eds) Co-creating sustainable urban futures. A primer on applying transition management in cities. Springer, Tokyo
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J.M. (2018). A German Experience: The Challenges of Mediating ‘Ideal-Type’ Transition Management in Ludwigsburg. In: Frantzeskaki, N., Hölscher, K., Bach, M., Avelino, F. (eds) Co-creating Sustainable Urban Futures. Future City, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69273-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69273-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69271-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69273-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)