Skip to main content

Biophysical Analysis of Agri-Food Systems: Scales, Energy Efficiency, Power and Metabolism of Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Socio-Metabolic Perspectives on the Sustainability of Local Food Systems

Part of the book series: Human-Environment Interactions ((HUEN,volume 7))

Abstract

In this chapter, I discuss some important theoretical issues that should be addressed when attempting a sustainability assessment of the biophysical performance of agri-food systems . Assessing the sustainability of an agri-food system is a complex matter due to the multi-functional nature of agriculture and the multi-scale nature of the relations between agroecosystems and socio-economic systems . The complexification of the agri-food system makes it difficult to clearly establish what is local , and what can be described as a short food chain, and we might be confronted with cases where, according to certain environmental criteria, products imported from a long distance can perform better than locally produced ones. I argue that a fund/flow analysis is a very useful approach when assessing the pressure on biophysical systems and monitoring their health (stock/flow, and flow/flow may also be useful approaches). Energy is the cornerstone of any living system, including societies. I discuss how energy efficiency and energy flow (power) need to be understood as mutually dependent factors, and how they play a key role in interfacing with the performance of the agri-food and socio-economic systems. If we address societies as living systems, we adopt the concept of metabolism as a useful approach to study the functioning of the biophysical characteristics of agri-food systems and societies alike. In this chapter, I review the history of the concept of metabolism in this context and the approaches taken by the two main schools of thought on the topic. As many definitions are found in literature on the subject, I try to suggest two possible definitions, taking into account the specific approaches. The Vienna school , led by Marina Fischer-Kowalski, embraces a stock/flow and flow/flow approach, considering society as a black box. I would suggest naming this approach “steady-state social metabolism”, or, for short, “social metabolism”. The Barcelona school, led by Mario Giampietro, addresses the relation between fund/flow patterns taking place in a society (its internal organisation), and the fund/flow patterns taking place in its environment as a co-evolutionary, self-organising process. I would suggest naming this approach “co-evolutionary societal-ecological metabolism”, or, for short, “societal metabolism”. Finally, I stress that a biophysical analysis has to be carried out in parallel with an analysis of the socio-economic dimension of a society, as the two dimensions are strictly correlated. I point out that in order to develop a more sustainable agri-food system, we have to intervene in the very functioning of society, and that the complex nature of society’s metabolism has to be carefully addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Of course, efficiency also concerns the socio-economic side of productive activity, for example labour, capital.

  2. 2.

    Post-harvest cold storage in a controlled atmosphere is widely used for many kinds of fruits and vegetables (The Guardian 2003; Gile 2013).

  3. 3.

    Germany may not be food self-sufficient even if all the agricultural land were to grow wheat and pea in rotation and no animals were reared (Gomiero 2017).

  4. 4.

    See Sect. 3.5.1 for definitions of the terms viability, feasibility and desirability.

  5. 5.

    There are still small societies (i.e., isolated communities of hunter and gatherers and horticulturists) where the complexity of the communities is very limited compared to industrialised countries.

  6. 6.

    According to Altieri (2002, p. 8) “Agroecosystems are communities of plants and animals interacting with their physical and chemical environments that have been modified by people to produce food, fibre, fuel and other products for human consumption and processing”.

  7. 7.

    Actually, fossil fuels are renewable but over geological times, that is to say tens/hundreds of millions of years, a timespan that is not compatible to the life time of human societies or the human species.

  8. 8.

    Phosphorus has no substitute in food production. Phosphorus security is emerging as one of the twenty-first century’s greatest global sustainability challenges (Cordell and White 2014).

  9. 9.

    Fossil water, also known as paleowater, is water that has been contained in some undisturbed space, usually groundwater in an aquifer, for thousands of years. Fossil water aquifers are either poorly replenished or not replenished at all, making groundwater in those aquifers a non-renewable resource (Steward et al. 2013).

  10. 10.

    An important indicator of energy efficiency is the Energy Return On Investment indicator (EROI, or EROEI, the Energy Return on Energy Invested). EROI refers to how much energy is returned from one unit of energy invested in an energy-producing activity (Hall et al. 1992, 2011; Giampietro and Mayumi 2009; Pelletier et al. 2011). See Hall et al. (2011, 2014), for a review of the different approaches to the calculation and Tello et al. (2016) for a further development of the concept in the case of agriculture.

  11. 11.

    Nevertheless, while the use of more and better technology may help increase labour productivity, it requires a lot of energy too. Computerised tractors, satellites, and other technologies do not come cheap in energy terms, Genetic Modified Organisms are a risky enterprise, and seem to lead to more problems (e.g., pest resistance, increased use of agrochemicals, soil degradation, a worrisome monopoly on seeds, health issues). Technology is also costly in economic terms, and its adoption tends to follow a process of fast-decreasing marginal returns (increasingly large investments compared to prices, leading to reduced net earnings). Large estates can cope with the problem because of their economies of scale. Smaller farmers face bankruptcy instead, and have to quit their jobs, their farms bought by large estates, which get even larger (Mazoyer and Roudart 2006).

  12. 12.

    For a technical discussion concerning power and its relation to the development of a society, I refer the reader to Odum (1971), Smil (1994, 2003, 2008), Giampietro and Mayumi (2009), Giampietro et al. (2013); Giampietro and Diaz-Maurin (2014).

  13. 13.

    The impact of technology on highly populated countries of the Global South has been a concern since the 1960s. The issue was addressed by renowned scholar Ernst Schumacher, who, in the 1970s, popularised the concept of “intermediate technology”, a technology that is appropriate in order to increase productivity in countries of the Global South, but only to a certain extent—to prevent the spread of massive unemployment (Schumacher 1973).

References

  • Altieri, M. (1987). Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A. (2002). Agroecology: The science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 93(1–3), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R. U. (1994). Industrial metabolism: Theory & policy. In R. U. Ayres & E. S. Udo (Eds.), Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustainable Development, Chapter 1: 3–20, Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R. U., & Ayres, L. W. (1996). Industrial ecology: Closing the materials cycle. Aldershott, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, J., Borchers, A., & Jones, C. A. (2013). Agriculture’s supply and demand for energy and energy products, EIB-112, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, May 2013. http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/1104145/eib112.pdf.

  • Beets, W. C. (1990). Raising and sustaining productivity of smallholder farming system in the tropics. Alkmaar, The Netherlands: AgBe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, T. (1989). Marxism and natural limits: An ecological critique and reconstruction. New Left Review, 178, 51–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bot, A., & Benites, J. (2005). The importance of soil organic matter. Key to drought-resistant soil and sustained food production. FAO, Rome, http://www.fao.org/docrep/009/a0100e/a0100e00.htm#Contents.

  • Bray, F. (1994). The rice economies: Technology and development in Asian societies. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunori, G. (Ed.). (2016). Special issue: Sustainability performance of conventional and alternative food chains. Sustainability, http://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability/special_issues/conventional-and-alternative-food-chains.

  • Brunori, G., Galli, F., Barjolle, D., Van Broekhuizen, R., Colombo, L., Giampietro, M., et al. (2016). Are local food chains more sustainable than global food chains? Considerations for assessment. Sustainability, 8(5), 27. doi:10.3390/su8050449.

  • Camargo, G. G. T., Ryan, M. R., & Richard, T. (2013). Energy use and greenhouse gas emission from crop production using the farm energy analysis toll. BioScience, 63, 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canning, P., Charles, C. A., Huang, S., Polenske, K. R., Waters, A. (2010). Energy use in the U.S. food system; Economic Research Report No. 94; United States Department of Agriculture: Washington DC, USA. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economic-research-report/err94.aspx.

  • Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts?: Putting the first last. London, UK: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CIA (Central Intelligence Agency, USA). (2016). Labor force—by occupation. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2048.html.

  • Cochrane, W. W. (1993). The development of American agriculture: A historical analysis (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN, USA: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordell, D., & White, S. (2014). Life’s Bottleneck: Sustaining the world’s phosphorus for a food secure future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 161–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSM (Civil Society Mechanism). (2016). Connecting smallholders to markets: An analytical guide. Committee on World Food Security. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/cfs/Docs1516/cfs43/CSM_Connecting_Smallholder_to_Markets_EN.pdf.

  • Diamond, J. (1998). Guns, germs and steel: A short history of everybody for the last 13,000 years. New York, USA: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekanem, E., Mafuyai, M., & Clardy, A. (2016). Economic importance of local food markets: Evidence from the literature. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 47, 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Hage Scialabba, N., & Müller-Lindenlauf, M. (2010). Organic agriculture and climate change. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 25, 158–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, R. (1982). Environment, subsistence and system. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ericksen, P. J. (2008). Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change, 18, 234–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2001). Farming systems and poverty: Improving farmers’ livelihoods in a changing world. FAO, Rome, Italy, Available online ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/003/y1860e/y1860e.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2013). Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems (SAFA). FAO, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/nr/sustainability_pathways/docs/SAFA_Indicators_final_19122013.pdf.

  • FAO (The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2016). Energy, agriculture and climate change: Towards energy-smart agriculture. FAO, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6382e.pdf.

  • FAO (The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2017). Analysis of farming systems. http://www.fao.org/farmingsystems/description_en.htm.

  • FAO and ITPS. (2015). Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR). Main Report, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/c6814873-efc3-41db-b7d3-2081a10ede50/.

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1997). Society’s metabolism: On the childhood and adolescence of a rising conceptual star. In M. Redclift & G. Woodgate (Eds.), The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology (pp. 119–37). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1998a). Society’s metabolism. The intellectual history of materials flow analysis, Part I, 1860–1970. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2, 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1998b). Society’s Metabolism. The intellectual history of materials flow analysis, Part II, 1970–1998. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2, 107–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Haberl, H. (2007). Conceptualizing, observing and comparing socioecological transitions. In M. Fischer-Kowalski & H. Haberl (Eds.), Socioecological transitions and global change: Trajectories of social metabolism and land use (pp. 1–30). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Haberl, H. (2015). Social metabolism: A metrics for biophysical growth and degrowth. In J.Martinez-Alier & R.Muradian (Eds.), Handbook of Ecological Economics (pp. 100–138). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J. (2016). Local food is great, but can it go too far? https://the-macroscope.org/local-food-is-great-but-can-it-go-too-far-ba686abe2ab7#.lasuswvds.

  • Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., et al. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478, 337–342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gamboa, G., Kovacic, Z., Di Masso, M., Mingorría, S., Gomiero, T., Rivera-Ferré, M., et al. (2016). The complexity of food systems: Defining relevant attributes and indicators for the evaluation of food supply chains in Spain. Sustainability, 8, 515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M. (1997). Socioeconomic constraints to farming with biodiversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 62(2,3), 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M. (2004). Multi-scale integrated analysis of agroecosystems. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M. (2014). The scientific basis of the narrative of societal and ecosystem metabolism. In M. Giampietro, R. J. Aspinall, J. Ramos-Martin, & S. G. F. Bukkens (Eds.), Resource accounting for sustainability assessment: The nexus between energy, food, water and land use. New York, USA: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M., Aspinall, R. J., Ramos-Martin, J., & Bukkens, S. G. F. (Eds.). (2014). Resource accounting for sustainability assessment: The nexus between energy, food, water and land use. New York, USA: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampierto, M., & Diaz-Maurin, F. (2014). Energy grammar. In M. Giampietro, R. J. Aspinall, J. Ramos-Martin, & S. G. F. Bukkens (Eds.), Resource accounting for sustainability assessment: The nexus between energy, food, water and land use (pp. 90–115). Routledge: New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro. M., & Lomas, P. (2014). Interface of societal and ecosystem metabolism. In M. Giampietro, R. J. Aspinall, J. Ramos-Martin, & S. G. F. Bukkens (Eds.), Resource accounting for sustainability assessment: The nexus between energy, food, water and land use (pp. 33–48). Routledge: New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2000). Introduction to the special issues on societal metabolism: Blending new insights from complex system thinking with old insights from biophysical analyses of the economic process. Population and Environment, 22, 97–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M., & Mayumi, K. (2009). The biofuel delusion: The fallacy of large scale agro-biofuels production (p. 318). Earthscan: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., & Sorman, A. H. (2012). The metabolic pattern of societies: Where economists fall short. Taylor & Francis Group: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., & Sorman, A. H. (2013). Energy analysis for a sustainable future. Routledge, London, UK: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M., & Pastore, G. (1999). Multidimensional reading of the dynamics of rural intensification in China: The Amoeba approach. Critical Review in Plant Sciences, 18(3), 299–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gile, A. (2013). The science of cold apple storage. Modern farmer. http://modernfarmer.com/2013/08/the-science-of-cold-apple-storage/.

  • Gomiero, T. (2013). Alternative land management strategies and their impact on soil conservation. Agriculture, 3, 464–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomiero, T. (2015). Are biofuels an effective and viable energy strategy for industrialized societies? A reasoned overview of potentials and limits. Sustainability, 7, 8491–8521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomiero, T. (2016). Soil degradation, land scarcity and food security: Reviewing a complex challenge. Sustainability, 8, 281; doi:10.3390/su8030281.

  • Gomiero, T. (2017). Agriculture and degrowth: State of the art and assessment of organic and biotech-based agriculture from a degrowth perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.237. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomiero, T., & Giampietro, M. (2001). Multiple-scale integrated analysis of farming systems: The Thuong Lo commune (Vietnamese uplands) case study. Population and Environment, 22(3), 315–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomiero, T., Giampietro, M., Bukkens, S. M., & Paoletti, G. M. (1997). Biodiversity use and technical performance of freshwater fish culture in different socio-economic context: China and Italy. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 62(2,3), 169–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomiero, T., Giampietro, M., & Mayumi, K. (2006). Facing complexity on agroecosystems: A new approach to farming system analysis. International Journal Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 5, 116–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomiero, T., Pimentel, D., & Paoletti, M. G. (2011a). Is there a need for a more sustainable agriculture? Critical Reviews in Plant Science, 30, 6–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomiero, T., Pimentel, D., & Paoletti, M. G. (2011b). Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: Conventional versus organic agriculture. Critical Reviews in Plant Science, 30, 95–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • González de Molina, M., & Toledo, V. M. (2014). The social metabolism. A socio-ecological theory of historical change. Germany: Springer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg, D. (1992). The transformation of the agriculture in the west. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. A. S., Cleveland, C. J., & Kaufmann, R. (1992). Energy and resource quality. Niwot, Colorado, USA: University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. A. S., Dale, B. E., & Pimentel, D. (2011). Seeking to understand the reasons for different energy Return on investment (EROI) estimates for biofuels. Sustainability, 3, 2413–2432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. A. S., Lambert, J. G., & Balogh, S. B. (2014). EROI of different fuels and the implications for society. Energy Policy, 64, 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, M. W. (2015). Feeding cities—with Indoor vertical farms? http://www.fcrn.org.uk/fcrn-blogs/michaelwhamm/feeding-cities-indoor-vertical-farms.

  • Harris, M. (1998). Good to eat: Riddles of food and culture. Long Grove, Illinois, USA: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillel, D. (1991). Out of the Earth: Civilization and the life of the soil. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R., Alison, R., & Cowan, T. (2013). The role of local food systems in U.S. Farm Policy. Congressional Research Service, Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress, R42155. https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42155.pdf.

  • JRC (Joint Research Centre). (2010). The State of soil in Europe. A contribution of the JRC to the EEA Environment State and Outlook Report—SOER 2010. Joint Research Centre, EC, Ispra (VA), Italy. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC68418/lbna25186enn.pdf.

  • Kelemen, E., Nguyen, G., Gomiero, T., Kovács, E., Choisis, J.-P., Choisis, N., et al. (2013). Farmers’ perceptions on biodiversity: Lessons learnt from a discourse-based qualitative valuation study. Land Use Policy, 35, 318–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneafsey, M., Venn, L., Schmutz, U., Balázs, B., Trenchard, L., Eyden-Wood, T., et al. (2013). Short food supply chains and local food systems in the EU. A state of play of their socio-economic characteristics. European Commission, EUR 25911—Joint Research Centre—Institute for Prospective Technological StudiesLuxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=6279.

  • Krausmann, F., Erb, K. -H., Gingrich, S., Lauk, C., & Haberl, H. (2008). Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: A comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints. Ecological Economics, 65, 471–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T., Barling, D., & Caraher, M. (2009). Food policy: Integrating health, environment and society. London, UK: Earthscan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Madrid, C., Cabello, V., & Giampietro, M. (2013). Water-use sustainability in socioecological systems: A multiscale integrated approach. BioScience, 63, 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, S., Hand, M., Da Pra, M., Pollack, S., Ralston, K., Smith, T., et al. (2010). Local food systems: Concepts, impacts, and Issues. ERR 97, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, May 2010. http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/122868/err97_1_.pdf.

  • Martinez-Alier, J. (1990). Ecological economics, energy, environment and society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazoyer, M., & Roudart, L. (2006). The history of world agriculture: From the Neolithic age to the present crisis (p. 2006). Earthscan: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, D. J., & Dillon, J. L. (1997). Farm management for Asia: A system approach. FAO, Rome, p. 355. http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/0358a77f-37f0-5297-8b84-503398b45f21/.

  • Mintz, S. W., & Du Bois, C. M. (2002). The anthropology of food and eating. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. R. (2007). Dirt: The erosion of civilization. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. T. (1971). Environment, power, and society. New York, USA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/FAO. (2016). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2016–2025, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/agr_outlook-2016-en.

  • Payen, S., Basset-Mens, C., & Perret, S. (2015). LCA of local and imported tomato: An energy and water trade-off. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 39–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauliuk, S., & Hertwich, E.G. (2015). Socioeconomic metabolism as paradigm for studying the biophysical basis of human societies. Ecological Economics, 119, 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, N., Audsley, E., Brodt, S., Garnett, T., Henriksson, P., Kendall, A., et al. (2011). Energy intensity of agriculture and food systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36, 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilcher, J. (Ed.). (2012). The oxford handbook of food history. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, G., & Giampietro, M. (1994). Food, land, population and the U.S. economy. Carrying Capacity Network 2000 P Street, N.W., Suite 240 Washington DC. http://www.dieoff.com/page55.htm#TABLE_6.

  • Pimentel, D., & Hall, C. W. (Eds.). (1984). Food and natural resources. San Diego, USA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., & Pimentel, M. (1979). Food, energy, and society. New York, USA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., & Pimentel, M. (2008). Food, Energy, and Society (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, F. L. (2005). Economic system of foraging, agricultural and industrial societies. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reganold, J. P., & Wachter, J. M. (2016). Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century. Nature Plants, 1, 15221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G., & Schmallegger, D. (Eds). (2015). The globalisation of agriculture. Edward Elgar Handbook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusco, E., Jones, R., & Bidoglio, G. (2001). Organic matter in the soils of Europe: Present status and future trends. European Soil Bureau Soil and Waste Unit Institute for Environment and Sustainability JRC Ispra, Italy. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC24739/EUR%2020556%20EN.pdf.

  • Saunders, C., Barber, A., & Taylor, G. (2006). Food Miles—Comparative Energy/Emissions Performance of New Zealand’s Agriculture Industry. Research Report No. 285 Agribusiness & Economics Research Unit, Lincoln University, New Zealand. http://www.jborganics.co.nz/saundersreport.pdf. Accessed October 20, 2016.

  • Scharber, H., & Dancs, A. (2016). Do locavores have a dilemma? Economic discourse and the local food critique. Agriculture and Human Values, 33, 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful. New York, USA: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano-Tovar, T., & Giampietro, M. (2014). Multi-scale integrated analysis of rural Laos: Studying metabolic patterns of land uses across different levels and scales. Land Use Policy, 36, 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smil, V. (1991). General energetics. New York, USA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil, V. (1994). Energy in the world history. USA: Westview Press, Boulder, Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil, V. (2000). Feeding the World: A challenge for the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil, V. (2003). Energy at the crossroads. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil, V. (2008). Energy in nature and society: General energetics of complex systems. Cambridge, USA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil, V. Power Density Primer. (2010). Available online http://www.vaclavsmil.com/wpcontent/uploads/docs/smil-article-power-density-primer.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2015.

  • Smil, V., Nachman, P., & Long II, T. V. (1982). Energy analysis and agriculture: An application to U.S. Corn Production. Westview Press, Boulder, CO., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper, R. (2016). Local is not fair: Indigenous peasant farmer preference for export markets. Agriculture and Human Values, 33, 537. doi:10.1007/s10460-015-9620-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorman, A. H., & Giampietro, M. (2013). The energetic metabolism of societies and the degrowth paradigm: Analyzing biophysical constraints and realities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 38, 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steward, D. R., Bruss, P. J., Yang, X., Staggenborg, S. A., Welch, S. M., & Apley, M. D. (2013). Tapping unsustainable groundwater stores for agricultural production in the High Plains Aquifer of Kansas, projections to 2110. PNAS, 110, E3477–E3486.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stout, B. A. (1984). Energy use and management in agriculture. MA, USA: Breton Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Timmer, C.P. (2009). A World without Agriculture: The Structural Transformation in Historical Perspective. Washington, DC, USA: The AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansey, G., & Rajotte, T. (2008). The future control of food. London, UK: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansey, G., & Worsley, T. (1995). The food system: A guide. London, UK: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tello, E., Galán, E., Sacristán, V., Cunfer, G., Guzmán, G. I., González de Molina, M., et al. (2016). Opening the black box of energy throughputs in farm systems: A decomposition analysis between the energy returns to external inputs, internal biomass reuses and total inputs consumed (the Vallès County, Catalonia, c.1860 and 1999). Ecological Economics, 121, 160–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian. (2003). Just how old are the ‘fresh’ fruit & vegetables we eat? https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2003/jul/13/foodanddrink.features18.

  • Tscharntke, T., Tylianakis, J. M., Rand, T. A., Didham, R. K., Fahrig, L., Batáry, P., et al. (2012). Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes—Eight hypotheses. Biological Reviews, 87, 661–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L. I. I., & Brush, S. B. (1987). Comparing farming systems. New York, USA: The Guilford press.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. (2016). Fertilizer Use & markets. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-practices-management/chemical-inputs/fertilizer-use-markets/.

  • USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). (2014). Census of agriculture—2012 Census Publications. https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_US/usv1.pdf.

  • Wall, D. H., Bardgett, R. D., Behan-Pelletier, V., Herrick, J. E., Jones, T. H., Ritz, K., et al. (Eds.). (2012). Soil ecology and ecosystem services. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, C. (2001). Total energy indicators of agricultural sustainability: Dairy farming case study. Final report. Prepared for Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry by University of Otago, Dunedin. http://www.maf.govt.nz/mafnet/publications/techpapers/techpaper0103-dairy-farming-case-study.pdf. Accessed October 20, 2016.

  • Williams, A. (2007). Comparative study of cut roses for the British market produced in Kenya and the Netherlands. http://www.fcrn.org.uk/sites/default/files/Cut_roses_for_the_British_market.pdf. Accessed October 20, 2016.

  • Wilson, P. (1992). The inputs to agriculture. In C. R. W. Spedding (Ed.), Fream’s principles of food and agriculture (pp. 204–227). Cambridge, MA, USA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. (1998). Land resources: Now and for the future. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiziano Gomiero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gomiero, T. (2017). Biophysical Analysis of Agri-Food Systems: Scales, Energy Efficiency, Power and Metabolism of Society. In: Fraňková, E., Haas, W., Singh, S. (eds) Socio-Metabolic Perspectives on the Sustainability of Local Food Systems. Human-Environment Interactions, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69236-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics