Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to suggest the use of cellular automaton as a basis for risk and vulnerability assessment (RVA). A cellular automaton (CA) is a collection of ‘colored’ cells on a grid of specified shape that evolves through a number of discrete time steps according to a set of rules based on the states of neighboring cells. The rules are then applied iteratively for as many time steps as desired. von Neumann was one of the first people to consider such a model, and incorporated a cellular model into his ‘universal constructor.’ In present research, a model elaborating on CA application in assessing risk and vulnerability with an emphasis on forest, fire, and smoke is provided. Specifically, this research posits a model treating dispersion cloud as collection of ‘nanomachines’ (model’s ‘air blobs’, or ‘particles’), all advected with the wind, and each moving in the advected mass of air according to a simple rule expressing one dominant component of the Navier–Stokes equation for momentum conservation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The topic of cellular automaton and more toward that application in assessing vulnerability is visited in Chap. 15.
- 2.
A 1024 × 768 display resolution served as a working reference for the DSS code’s current version.
References
Allgöwer, B., & Schöning, R. (2006). Forest fire modeling with GIS in the Swiss National Park. Santa Fe, CA: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/conf/SANTA_FE_CDOM/sf_papers/allgower_britta/allgower.html.
Civil Defense Office. (2006). VBS desktop assistant. Bern, Switzerland: Department of Defense.
Gheorghe, A. V. (Ed.). (2005). Integrated risk and vulnerability management assisted by decision support systems: Relevance and impact on governance (Vol. 8). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Gheorghe, A. V., & Vamanu, D. V. (2008). Forest fire essentials: A cellular automaton-wise, percolation-oriented model. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 4(4), 430–444.
Gutowitz, H. (Ed.). (1991). Cellular automata: Theory and experiment (1st ed.). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
Hargrove, W. W., Gardner, R. H., Turner, M. G., Romme, W. H., & Despain, D. G. (2000). Simulating fire patterns in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecological Modelling, 135(2–3), 243–263. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00368-9.
Ilachinski, A. (2001). Cellular automata: A discrete universe (Reprint ed.). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.
Margenstern, M. (2007). Cellular automata in hyperbolic spaces: Theory (Vol. 1). Paris: Gordon Breach.
Richardson, D. (1972). Tessellations with local transformations. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 6(5), 373–388. doi:10.1016/S0022-0000(72)80009-6.
Wolfram, S. (1983). Statistical mechanics of cellular automata. Reviews of Modern Physics, 55(3), 601–644.
Wolfram, S. (2002). A new kind of science. Champaign, IL: Wolfram Media.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gheorghe, A.V., Vamanu, D.V., Katina, P.F., Pulfer, R. (2018). Use of Cellular Automata in Assessment of Risk and Vulnerability. In: Critical Infrastructures, Key Resources, Key Assets. Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69224-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69224-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69223-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69224-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)