Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education pp 281–300Cite as

Infusing Literacy into an Inquiry Instructional Model to Support Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Disciplinary literacy is increasingly emphasised as an important enabler for students to learn science inquiry. However, the nature of literacy instruction and how it supports inquiry-based science in practice still remains unclear. This chapter reports on the design and enactment of an integrated literacy-inquiry instructional model aimed to support students’ development of disciplinary literacy in science. With the goal of understanding how literacy instruction supports inquiry-based science in practice, the study reported in this chapter utilised a design research to develop, enact, and test the literacy-inquiry model in four secondary school science (physics and chemistry) classrooms in Singapore. Analytical cases are shown to illustrate the nature of the literacy activities involved in the classrooms, and how they supported science inquiry in terms of: (a) framing driving question, (b) conducting experiments and collecting evidence, (c) constructing explanations and (d) communicating and evaluating explanations. The cases also illustrate how the participating teachers utilised and integrated literacy activities to support inquiry in their classrooms in order to enable the students to construct and communicate scientific explanations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95, 639–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., et al. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs: BSCS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervetti, G., Pearson, P. D., Bravo, M. A., & Barber, J. (2006). Reading and writing in the service of inquiry-based science. In R. Douglas, M. Klentschy, & K. Worth (Eds.), Linking science and literacy in the K-8 classroom (pp. 221–244). Arlington: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z., & Wei, Y. (2010). Improving middle school students’ science literacy through reading infusion. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(4), 262–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. J. (2015). Educational implications of choosing “practice” to describe science in the next generation science standards. Science Education, 99(6), 1041–1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, B., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B. J., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., et al. (2003). Message from the “Island group”: What is literacy in science literacy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 607–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, E. V., Lim, M., & Campos, J. (2009). Journeys into inquiry-based elementary science: Literacy practices, questioning, and empirical study. Science Education, 93(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, C. Y., Wong, D., Chew, C., & Ong, K. S. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook for teaching secondary physics. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moje, E. B. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education, 31, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2014). Literacy for science: Exploring the intersection of the next generation science standards and common core for ELA standards. A workshop summary. Washington: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ødegaard, M., Haug, B., Mork, S. M., & Sørvik, G. O. (2014). Challenges and support when teaching science through an integrated inquiry and literacy approach. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 2997–3020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.942719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. F., & Patterson, A. (2011). Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? Science Education, 95, 627–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328(5977), 459–463. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon, C. L., Lee, Y. J., Tan, A. L., & Lim, S. S. L. (2012). Knowing inquiry as practice and theory: Developing a pedagogical framework with elementary science teachers. Research in Science Education, 42(2), 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putra, G. B. S., & Tang, K.-S. (2016). Disciplinary literacy instructions on writing scientific explanations: A case study from a chemistry classroom in an all-girls school. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(3), 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00022c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Tsai, S.-P., & Schneider, J. (2010). Testing one premise of scientific inquiry in science classrooms: Examining students’ scientific explanations and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 583–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20356

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settlage, J. (2007). Moving past a belief in inquiry as a pedagogy: Implications for teacher knowledge. In E. Abrams, S. A. Southerland, & P. Silva (Eds.), Inquiry in the classroom: Realities and opportunities (pp. 204–215). Charlotte: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of Expert Readers in Three Disciplines. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 393–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11424071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A. L., Talaue, F., & Kim, M. (2014). From transmission to inquiry: Influence of curriculum demands on in-service teachers’ perception of science as inquiry. In A. L. Tan, C. L. Poon, & S. S. L. Lim (Eds.), Inquiry into the Singapore science classrooms. Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, K. S. (2015). The PRO instructional strategy in the construction of scientific explanations. Teaching Science, 61(4), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, K. S. (2016a). Constructing scientific explanations through premise – reasoning – outcome (PRO): An exploratory study to scaffold students in structuring written explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), 1415–1440. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1192309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, K. S. (2016b). How is disciplinary literacy addressed in the science classrooms? A Singaporean case study. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 39(3), 220–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, K. S., Ho, C., & Putra, G. B. S. (2016). Developing multimodal communication competencies: A case of disciplinary literacy focus in Singapore. In M. Mcdermott & B. Hand (Eds.), Using multimodal representations to support learning in the science classroom (pp. 135–158). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, K. S., Tighe, S. C., & Moje, E. B. (2014). Literacy in the science classroom. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Teaching dilemmas and solutions in content-area literacy (pp. 57–80). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P., & Waldrip, B. (2013). Constructing representations to learn in science. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, L. (1998). “Sound” explanations in school science: A functional linguistic perspective on effective apprenticing texts. Linguistics and Education, 9(2), 199–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, L. (2001). Evaluating the language of different types of explanations in junior high school science texts. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6), 585–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veel, R. (1997). Learning how to mean - scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In C. Frances & J. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 161–195). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

    Kok-Sing Tang

  2. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    Gde Buana Sandila Putra

Authors
  1. Kok-Sing Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gde Buana Sandila Putra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kok-Sing Tang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Curtin University, Perth, Western Autralia, Australia

    Kok-Sing Tang

  2. Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden

    Kristina Danielsson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tang, KS., Putra, G. (2018). Infusing Literacy into an Inquiry Instructional Model to Support Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations. In: Tang, KS., Danielsson, K. (eds) Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69196-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69197-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation