Advertisement

Governing Platforms in the Internet of Things

  • Maximilian Schreieck
  • Christoph Hakes
  • Manuel Wiesche
  • Helmut Krcmar
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 304)

Abstract

The ambivalent paradigm Internet of Things (IoT) is gaining importance in today’s industries. To manage the various devices built on different technologies and to apply complex event-triggered business rules to the data streams, platforms are necessary tools for almost all use cases. In the recent years, hundreds of vendors entered the intransparent IoT platform market, from small startups focusing on niches, to large enterprise vendors offering professional solutions. These platforms need tools to orchestrate the interactions between the different sides involved, so-called platform governance mechanisms. The purpose of this multiple case study analysis is to explore the platform governance mechanisms applied in IoT platforms. To achieve this goal, we explored the governance concepts of eight selected platforms in a multiple case study analysis, resulting in a description of the important aspects and differences regarding platform governance. Moreover, the four main trade-offs that platform vendors must be aware of are subsequently discussed. In a last step, an evaluation and discussion of the contribution to theory and practice is provided.

Keywords

Platform Software ecosystems Platform governance Internet of things IoT platform Openness Control Boundary resources 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We thank the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy for funding this research as part of the project 01MD15001D (ExCELL).

References

  1. 1.
    Scully, P., Holbrook, K., Glynn, P.: The Rise of IoT Platforms. IoT Analytics (2016) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smedlund, A., Faghankhani, H.: Platform orchestration for efficiency, development, and innovation. In: Forty Eighth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, pp. 1380–1388 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., van Alstyne, M.: Platform Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(10) (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boudreau, K.: Open platform strategies and innovation: granting access vs. devolving control. Manag. Sci. 56, 1849–1872 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tiwana, A.: Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sorensen, C., Yoo, Y.: Distributed tuning of boundary resources: the case of Apple’s iOS service system. MIS Q. 39, 217–243 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Manner, J., Nienaber, D., Schermann, M., Krcmar, H.: Six principles for governing mobile platforms. In: 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik Proceedings, Leipzig (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kazan, E., Damsgaard, J.: An investigation of digital payment platform designs: a comparative study of four european solutions. In: Twenty Second European Conference on Information Systems, Tel Aviv (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ondrus, J., Gannamaneni, A., Lyytinen, K.: The impact of openness on the market potential of multi-sided platforms: a case study of mobile payment platforms. J. Inf. Technol. 30, 260–275 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A.: Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 31, 417–433 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Teece, D.J.: Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 28, 1319–1350 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Toivanen, T., Mazhelis, O., Luoma, E.: Network analysis of platform ecosystems: the case of internet of things ecosystem. In: Fernandes, João M., Machado, R.J., Wnuk, K. (eds.) ICSOB 2015. LNBIP, vol. 210, pp. 30–44. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19593-3_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baldwin, C.Y., Woodard, C.J.: The architecture of platforms: a unified view. In: Gawer, A. (ed.) Platforms, Markets and Innovation. Cheltenham, UK (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Krcmar, H.: Multiple-case analysis on governance mechanism of multi-sided platforms. In: Nissen, V., Stelzer, D., Straßburger, S., Fischer, D. (eds.) Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 1613–1624. Universitätsverlag Ilmenau, Ilmenau (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sun, R., Gregor, S., Keating, B.: Information technology platforms: conceptualisation and a review of emerging research in the IS discipline. In: Twenty-Sixth Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Adelaide (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Krcmar, H.: Design and governance of platform ecosystems: key concepts and issues for future research. In: Twenty-Fourth European Conference on Information Systems, Istanbul (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Hein, A., Krcmar, H.: Governance of nonprofit platforms – Onboarding mechanisms for a refugee information platform. In: SIG GlobDev Ninth Annual Workshop, Dublin (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bakos, Y., Katsamakas, E.: Design and ownership of two-sided networks: implications for internet platforms. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 25, 171–202 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Armstrong, M.: Competition in two-sided markets. Rand J. Econ. 37, 668–691 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Evans, D.S.: Economics of vertical restraints for multi-sided platforms. SSRN Electron. J. (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bianco, V.D., Myllarniemi, V., Komssi, M., Raatikainen, M.: The role of platform boundary resources in software ecosystems: a case study. In: IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, Sydney (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Evans, D.S.: Governing bad behavior by users of multi-sided platforms. Berkeley Technol. Law J. 27, 1202–1249 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O.: Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Inf. Syst. J. 23, 173–192 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Visnjic, I., Cennamo, C.: The gang of four: acquaintances, friends or foes? Towards an integrated perspective on platform competition. SSRN Electron. J. (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brandenburger, A.M., Nalebuff, B.J.: Co-opetition: 1. A revolutionary mindset that combines competition and co-operation; 2. The game theory strategy that’s changing the game of business. Doubleday, New York, NY (1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mantena, R., Saha, R.L.: Co-opetition between differentiated platforms in two-sided markets. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 29, 109–140 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hurni, T., Huber, T.: The interplay of power and trust in platform ecosystems of the enterprise application software industry. In: Twenty Second European Conference on Information Systems, Tel Aviv (2014)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nambisan, S.: Information technology and product/service innovation: a brief assessment and some suggestions for future research. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. (JAIS) 14, 215–226 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nakhuva, B., Champaneria, T.: Study of various internet of things platforms. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. Surv. 6, 61–74 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schlautmann, A., Levy, D., Keeping, S., Pankert, G.: Wanted: Smart market-makers for the “Internet of Things”. Prism (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yin, R.K.: Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks, California (2013)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Flash Reproductions, Toronto (2010)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Huberman, A.M., Miles, M.B.: Data management and analysis methods. In: Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1994)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hagiu, A., Wright, J.: Multi-sided platforms. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 43, 162–174 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., Bush, A.A.: Platform evolution: coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inf. Syst. Res. 21, 675–687 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
  39. 39.
    Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., Wu, D.J.: Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem: the case of enterprise software. MIS Q. 36, 263–290 (2012)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gulati, R., Puranam, P., Tushman, M.: Meta-organization design: rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strateg. Manag. J. 33, 571–586 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maximilian Schreieck
    • 1
  • Christoph Hakes
    • 1
  • Manuel Wiesche
    • 1
  • Helmut Krcmar
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair for Information SystemsTechnical University of MunichGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations