The Joy of Slash

  • Lucy Neville


This chapter examines in more detail what the 84 per cent of respondents who participate in slash fandoms enjoy about sexually explicit slash fiction. It looks at the sense of community and security provided by these spaces, and the opportunity they provide women to explore issues around gender and sexuality.


  1. Akinsha, M. K. (2009). A story of man’s great love for his fellow man: Slash fan fiction, a literary genre. MA dissertation, Central European University. Retrieved from
  2. Allington, D. (2007). ‘How come most people don’t see it?’: Slashing The Lord of the Rings. Social Semiotics, 17(1), 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacon-Smith, C. (1992). ‘Enterprising women’: Television fandom and the creation of popular myth. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bader, M. J. (2003). Arousal: The secret logic of sexual fantasies. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Barker, M. (1993). Seeing how far you can see: On being a ‘fan’ of 2000AD. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Reading audiences: Young people and the media (pp. 159–183). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barker, M. (2002, October 19–20). Slashing the Slayer: A thematic analysis of homo-erotic Buffy fan fiction. In: Blood, text and fears. Norwich: University of East Anglia. Retrieved from
  7. Barthes, R. (1970). S/Z: An essay. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  8. Beasley, C. (2011). Libidinous politics: Heterosex, ‘transgression’, and social change. Australian Feminist Studies, 26(67), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berg, H. (2014). Labouring porn studies. Porn Studies, 1(1–2), 75–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berg, H. (2015). Sex, work, queerly: Identity, authenticity, and laboured performance. In M. Laing, K. Pilcher, & N. Smith (Eds.), Queer sex work (pp. 23–31). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Booth, P. (2014). Slash and porn: Media subversion, hyper-articulation, and parody. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 28(3), 396–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyd, K. S. (2001). ‘One finger on the mouse scroll bar and the other on my clit’: Slash writers views on pornography, censorship, feminism and risk. PhD dissertation, Simon Fraser University. Retrieved from
  13. Brennan, J. (2014). Not ‘from my hot little ovaries’: How slash manips pierce reductive assumptions. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 28(2), 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Busse, K. (2005). ‘Digital get down’: Postmodern boy band slash and the queer female space. In C. Malcolm & J. Nyman (Eds.), Eroticism in American culture (pp. 103–125). Gdansk: Gdansk University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Cancian, F. M. (1990). Love in America: Gender and self-development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cooper, D. (2015, November 17). Zayn Malik’s next direction. The Fader. Retrieved from
  18. Cumberland, S. (1999). Private uses of cyberspace: Women, desire and fan culture. Paper presented at the Media in Transition Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, October 8. Retrieved from
  19. de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. F. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. de Montaigne, M. (1580/2005). On friendship. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. DeVoss, D. (2002). Women’s porn sites—Spaces of fissure and eruption or ‘I’m a little bit of everything’. Sexuality & Culture, 6(3), 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dhaenens, F., Vam Bauwel, S., & Biltereyst, D. (2008). Slashing the fiction of Queer Theory: Slash fiction, Queer reading, and transgressing the boundaries of screen studies, representations, and audiences. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 32(4), 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Doty, A. (1993). Making things perfectly queer: Interpreting mass culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  24. Doty, A. (2000). Flaming classics: Queering the film canon. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Dyer, R. (1995). The matter of images: Essays on representations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Falzone, P. J. (2005). The final frontier is queer: Aberrancy, archetype and audience generated folklore in K/S slashfiction. Western Folklore, 64(3/4), 243–261.Google Scholar
  27. Fazekas, A. (2014). Queer and unusual space: White supremacy in slash fanfiction. MA Dissertation, Queen’s University, Canada. Retrieved from
  28. Fiedler, L. A. (1960). Love and death in the American novel. New York: Scarborough Books.Google Scholar
  29. Fiske, J. (1987). British cultural studies and television. In R. C. Allen (Ed.), Channels of discourse: Television and contemporary criticism (pp. 254–289). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  30. Fiske, J. (1989). Understanding popular culture. Winchester: Unwin Hyman Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. (1986). Of other spaces. Diacritics, 16(1), 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Greven, D. (2009). Gender and sexuality in Star Trek: Allegories of desire in the television series and films. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
  33. Gwenllian Jones, S. (2002). The sex lives of cult television characters. Screen, 43, 77–90.Google Scholar
  34. Hansen, B. (2010). The darker side of slash fanfiction on the internet. In Y. Aris & H. I. R. Daniel (Eds.), New media and the politics of online communities (pp. 51–58). Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press.Google Scholar
  35. Haskell, M. (1974). From reverence to rape: The treatment of women in the movies. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  36. Hayward, S. (2000). Cinema studies: The key concepts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Hisatake, K. (2011). ‘Nothing says I despise you like a blowjob’: Opening queer moments for queer spaces in Harry Potter slash fan fiction. MA dissertation: University of Hawaii at Mānoa. Retrieved from
  38. hooks, b. (1992). Black looks: Race and representation. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  39. Irigaray, L. (1985). This sex which is not one (Catherine Porter with Carolyn Burke, Trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  40. James, J. (2017). The best enemies-to-lovers romances. Bookish Blog. Retrieved from
  41. Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Jones, R. (2017, July 26). Why Chris and Kem were the true star couple of Love Island 2017. The Telegraph. Retrieved from
  44. Keft-Kennedy, V. (2008). Fantasising masculinity in Buffyverse slash fiction: Sexuality, violence, and the vampire. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 7(1), 49–80.Google Scholar
  45. Kent, S. (1985). The erotic male nude. In S. Kent & J. Morreau (Eds.), Women’s images of men (pp. 75–105). London: Pandora.Google Scholar
  46. Kitson, N. (2009, March 2). Day six: Slashing the ties that bind. Burn Index. Retrieved from
  47. Lackner, E., Lucas, B. L., & Reid, R. A. (2006). Cunning linguists: The bisexual erotics of words/silence/flesh. In K. Hellekson & K. Busse (Eds.), Fan fiction and fan communities in the age of the internet (pp. 189–206). London: McFarland.Google Scholar
  48. Lang, R. (2002). Masculine interests: Homoerotics in hollywood film. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lee, K. (2003). Confronting enterprise slash fan fiction. Extrapolation, 44, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Levin Russo, J. (2002). ‘NEW VOY ‘cyborg sex’ J/7 [NC-17]’: New methodologies, new fantasies. The Slash Reader. August. Retrieved from
  51. Levin Russo, J. (2007). ‘The real thing’: Reframing queer pornography for virtual spaces. In K. Jacobs, M. Hanssen, & M. Pasquinelli (Eds.), C’lick me: A netporn studies reader (pp. 239–252). Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.Google Scholar
  52. Lindgren, S. (2010). Widening the glory hole: The discourse of online porn fandom. In F. Attwood (Ed.), (pp. 171–185). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  53. Lulu. (2013). AO3 census data analysis. Retrieved from
  54. Macleod, P. A. (forthcoming). Dirty diaries: A grounded ethnographic inquiry into experiences of queer feminist porn. PhD dissertation, Middlesex University, London.Google Scholar
  55. McGee, J. (2005). ‘In the end, it’s all made up’: The ethics of fanfiction and real person fiction. In P. M. Japp, M. Meister, & D. K. Japp (Eds.), Communication ethics, media & popular culture (Vol. 9, pp. 161–181). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  56. Meyer, U. (2010). Hidden in straight sight: Trans*gressing gender and sexuality via BL. In A. Levi, M. McHarry, & D. Pagliasotti (Eds.), Boys’ love manga (pp. 232–257). Jefferson: McFarland and Company.Google Scholar
  57. Miller, D. A. (1991). Anal rope. In D. Fuss (Ed.), Inside/out. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Mondin, A. (2014). Fair-trade porn+ niche markets+ feminist audience. Porn Studies, 1(1–2), 189–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Montemurro, B., Bloom, C., & Madell, K. (2003). Ladies night out: A typology of women patrons of a male strip club. Deviant Behaviour, 24(4), 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Neville, L. (2018). ‘The tent’s big enough for everyone’: Online slash fiction as a site for activism and change. Gender, Place and Culture. Online first
  61. Parrish, J. J. (2013). Metaphors we read by: People, process, and fan fiction. Transformative Works and Cultures, 14. Retrieved from
  62. Penley, C. (1991). Brownian motion: Women, tactics, and technology. In C. Penley & A. Ross (Eds.), Technoculture (pp. 135–161). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  63. Piper, M. (2015). Real body, fake person: Recontextualising celebrity bodies in fandom and film. Transformative Works and Culture, 20. Retrieved from
  64. Pugh, S. (2005). The democratic genre: Fan fiction in a literary context. Bridgend, Wales: Seren.Google Scholar
  65. Rambukkana, N. (2007). Is slash an alternative medium? ‘Queer’ heterotopias and the role of autonomous media spaces in radical world building. Affinities: A Journal of Radical Theory, Culture, and Action, 1(1), 69–85.Google Scholar
  66. Reid, R. A. (2009). Thrusts in the dark: Slashers’ queer practices. Extrapolation, 50(3), 463–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Roach, C. (2010). Getting a good man to love: Popular romance fiction and the problem of patriarchy. Journal of Popular Romance Studies, 1(1). Retrieved from
  68. Romano, A. (2012). The shipping news. The Backlot. Retrieved from
  69. Rosenberg, D. (2007). Confessions of a lesbian feminist slasher. Off Our Backs: The Feminist Newsjournal, 37, 51–52.Google Scholar
  70. Ross, S. (2002). Super(natural) women: Female heroes, their friends, and their fans. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  71. Rowling, J. K. (2003). Harry Potter and the order of the Phoenix. New York: Scholastic Press.Google Scholar
  72. Russ, J. (1985). Magic mommas, trembling sisters, puritans and perverts: Feminist essays. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing.Google Scholar
  73. Salmon, C., & Symons, D. (2001). Warrior lovers: Erotic fiction, evolution, and female sexuality. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  74. Saxey, E. (2002). Staking a claim: The series and its slash fiction. In R. Kaveney (Ed.), Reading The Vampire Slayer: An unofficial critical companion to Buffy and Angel (pp. 187–210). New York: Tauris Parke Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  75. Schauer, T. (2005). Women’s porno: The heterosexual female gaze in porn sites ‘for women’. Sexuality & Culture, 9(2), 42–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Scodari, C. (2003). Resistance re-examined: Gender, fan practices, and science fiction television. Popular Communication, 1(2), 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sedgwick, E. K. (1985). Between men: English literature and male homosocial desire. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Segal, L. (1994). Straight sex: The politics of pleasure. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
  79. Smith, N. (2015). Queer in/and sexual economies. In M. Laing, K. Pilcher, & N. Smith (Eds.), Queer sex work (pp. 13–22). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. Smol, A. (2004). ‘Oh … Oh … Frodo !’: Readings of male intimacy in ‘The Lord of the Rings’. Modern Fiction Studies, 50(4), 949–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Somogyi, V. (2002). Complexity of desire: Janeway/Chakotay Fan Fiction. Journal of American and Contemporary Cultures, 25, 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Staiger, J. (2005). Media reception studies. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Stanis, K., & Butler, S. (1995). Stranger than fiction. First Time, 43, 4–33.Google Scholar
  84. Straw, A. (2009). Squeeing, flailing, and the ‘post-Jared-and-Jensen glow’: An ethnography of Creation Entertainment’s March 2009 ‘Salute to Supernatural’ conventions. BA dissertation: Penn State University. Retrieved from
  85. Sutherland, J. (2006, February 14). Slashing through the undercult. The Telegraph. Retrieved from
  86. Thomas, B. (2014). Fans behaving badly? Real person fic and the blurring of the boundaries between the public and the private. In B. Thomas & J. Round (Eds.), Real lives, celebrity stories: Narratives of ordinary and extraordinary people across media (pp. 171–185). New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  87. Thrupkaew, N. (2003). Fan/tastic voyage: A journey into the wild, wild world of slash fiction. Bitch Magazine. Retrieved from
  88. Tosenberger, C. (2008). Homosexuality at the online Hogwarts: Harry Potter slash fanfiction. Children’s Literature, 36, 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Viegener, M. (1993). Kinky escapades, bedroom techniques, unbridled passion, and secret sex codes. In D. Bergman (Ed.), Camp grounds: Style and homosexuality (pp. 234–256). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  90. Woledge, E. (2005a). From slash to the mainstream: Female writers and gender blending men. Extrapolation, 46(1), 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Woledge, E. (2005b). Decoding desire: From Kirk and Spock to K/S1. Social Semiotics, 15(2), 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wolf, S. E. (2008). ‘Defying gravity’: Queer conventions in the musical wicked. Theatre Journal, 60(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucy Neville
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations