The Role of Navigation Around Tumor Board Participation
A general multidisciplinary cancer conference or tumor board is one of the five foundations for the basic structure of an accredited cancer program by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) program accreditation. The navigator is an extended member of this team and often a core responsibility within a nurse navigator’s job description calls for the role of patient advocacy in tumor conference participation. A literature review to explore exactly what a navigator contributed to a cancer conference or tumor board revealed sparse comments in limited publications on the subject. The Academy of Oncology Nurse & Patient Navigators (AONN+) has conducted sessions on this topic at their annual conferences and website videos on navigators’ participation around tumor boards. To further clarify the role of a navigator around tumor board activities, AONN+ asked its members to reply to a survey titled Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Questionnaire in the spring of 2017. The results of this survey are shared in three phases of tumor board participation—case preparation, activities during the actual tumor board, and follow-up after the discussion. A discussion on CME activities, legal implications, navigator participation within their professional role boundaries, and metrics are also discussed. The navigator can proactively recognize the need for a tumor board consult, champion the unique needs of each patient during the discussion, promote adherence to planned treatment, and support patients during transitions of care regarding future issues related to treatment goals.
KeywordsNavigation Tumor board Multidisciplinary cancer conference Tumor conference Patient navigation
The author would like to acknowledge the work of AONN+ staff on creating, dispatching, and collecting the responses of the survey titled Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Questionnaire in the spring of 2017.
- 1.National Cancer Institute Dictionaries. Multidisciplinary. 2017. www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms?cdrid=335079.
- 2.Horvath L, Yordan E, Malhotra D, Leyva I, Bortel K, Schalk D, et al. Multidisciplinary care in the oncology setting: historical perspective and data from lung and gynecology multidisciplinary clinics. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6(6):e21–6. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2010.000073.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 3.Pradesa J, Remueb E, van Hoofc E, Borrasa J. Is it worth reorganising cancer services on the basis of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs)? A systematic review of the objectives and organisation of MDTs and their impact on patient outcomes. Health Policy. 2015;119(4):464–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Lamb B, Green J, Benn J, Brown K, Vincent C, Sevdalis N. Improving decision making in multidisciplinary tumor boards: prospective longitudinal evaluation of a multicomponent intervention for 1,421 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(3):412–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.035.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Pillay B, Wootten A, Crowe H, Corcoran N, Tran B, Bowden P, Crowe J, Costello A. The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015;42:56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Charara R, Kreidieh F, Farhat R, Al-Feghali K, Khoury K, Haydar A, Nassar L, Berjawi G, Shamseddine A, Saghir N. Practice and impact of multidisciplinary tumor boards on patient management: A prospective study. J Global Oncol. 2016;3(3):242–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.2016.004960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Brauer D, Strand M, Sanford D, Kushnir V, Lim K, Mullady D, Tan B, Wang-Gillam A, Morton A, Ruzinova M, Parikh P, Narra V, Fowler K, Doyle M, Chapman W, Strasberg S, Hawkins W, Fields R. Utility of a multidisciplinary tumor board in the management of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal diseases: an observational study. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(2):133–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kuroki L, Stuckey A, Hirway P, Raker C, Bandera C, DiSilvestro P, Granai C, Lagare R, Sakr B, Dizon D. Addressing clinical trials: can the multidisciplinary tumor board improve participation? A study from an academic women’s cancer program. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116:295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.12.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. Cancer conference policy. 2016. www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/coc/standards
- 17.National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers. Interdisciplinary breast cancer conference. 2014. www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/napbc/2014%20napbc%20standards%20manual.ashx
- 18.Swanson J, Strusowski P, Mack N, Degroot J. Growing a navigation program using the NCCCP Navigation Assessment Tool. 2012. http://www.accc-cancer.org/oncology_issues/.../JA12-Growing-a-Navigation-Program.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Malone P, Bruno L, Hayden B, Carlson J. Development and evolution of an oncology nurse navigation program: from formation to fruitation. J Oncol Navig Surviv. 2014;5(5):19–24.Google Scholar
- 21.Academy of Oncology Nurse & Patient Navigators. Core competencies for oncology nurse navigator–certified generalists. 2017. www.aonnonline.org/certification/nurse-navigator-certification
- 22.Oncology Nursing Society. 2017 Oncology nurse navigator core competencies. 2017. www.ons.org/sites/default/files/2017ONNcompetencies.pdf
- 23.Advisory Board Company. Six opportunities to get the most out of your patient navigation program. 2016. www.advisory.com/research/oncology-roundtable/resources/2016/patient-navigation.
- 24.Messier N. The navigator’s role in coordinating multidisciplinary clinics and tumor boards. J Oncol Navig Surviv. 2010;1(6):21.Google Scholar
- 25.Burton E, Mathis L. The nurse navigator’s participation in tumor boards: a valuable communication vehicle presentation at the Academy of Oncology Nurse Navigators 4th Annual Navigation & Survivorship Conference November 14–17, 2013 in Memphis, TN; 2013.Google Scholar
- 26.Fala L. Highlights form the fourth annual navigation and survivorship conference. J Oncol Navig Surviv. 2014;5(2):4–15.Google Scholar
- 27.Shockney L. Why navigators should attend tumor boards. 2017. www.aonnonline.org/education/video-library/178-why-navigators-should-attend-tumor-boards.
- 28.Delarama F. Role of the oncology nurse navigator in tumor boards and multidisciplinary settings. 2014. www.aonnonline.org/education/video-library/512-role-of-the-oncology-nurse-navigator-in-tumor-boards-and-multidisciplinary-settings.
- 29.Skinner N. Role of the oncology nurse navigator in tumor boards and multidisciplinary settings. 2014. www.aonnonline.org/education/video-library/518-nancy-skinner-role-of-the-oncology-nurse-navigator-in-tumor-boards-and-multidisciplinary-settings.
- 30.Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education. Resources for planning and monitoring regularly scheduled series (RSS). 2017. www.accme.org/education-and-support/video/tutorials/resources-planning-and-monitoring-regularly-scheduled-series.
- 33.Gentry S, Sellers J. Navigation considerations when working with patients. In: Blaseg K, Daugherty P, Gamblin K, editors. Oncolgy nurse navigation delivering patient-centered care across the continuum. Pittsburgh, PA: Oncology Nursing Society; 2014. p. 71–120.Google Scholar
- 36.Schafer J, Swisher J. Cancer care coordination with nurse navigators. 2006. www.sg2.com/wp.../05/Cancer-Care-Coordination-with-Nurse-Navigators.pdf.
- 38.Bellomo C. Nurse navigation certification learning guide—care coordination. J Oncol Navig Surviv. 2016;7(5):30–2.Google Scholar
- 41.Academy of Oncology Nurse Navigators. Standardized metrics source document. 2017. https://www.aonnonline.org/metrics-source-document. Accessed 17 Jun 2017.
- 42.Strusowski P, Stapp J. Patient navigation metrics. Oncol Issues. January–February:62–9.Google Scholar