Triple-Agile: A Paradigm for Cloud Based SME Process Support

  • Ligita Businska
  • Maris Dargis
  • Marite KirikovaEmail author
  • Edgars Salna
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 303)


Considering cloud based solutions in business and IT alignment, an ecosystem perspective is here taken. If small and medium enterprises are willing to act agilely and developers of cloud IT solutions are willing to support these enterprises, then it is necessary to ensure rapid and flexible delivery/acquisition/migration regarding new IT solutions and new features thereof. When looking at enterprises and cloud solution providers as constituents of a business ecosystem, a Triple-Agile paradigm emerges, that considers agility from the following three perspectives: the perspective of SME processes, the perspective of adopting of and/or migrating to cloud solutions, and the perspective of cloud service development and management. While there is considerable theoretical and practical experience in each of the perspectives of agility mentioned, their Triple-Agile combination has not yet been properly researched. This paper investigates the possibility of the application of the Triple-Agile paradigm in the context of SMEs and cloud services.


Agile enterprise Cloud services Agile information systems SaaS PaaS SME 



The research has been supported in part by the funding from the research project “Competence Centre of Information and Communication Technologies” of EU Structural funds, contract No. signed between IT Competence Centre and Central Finance and Contracting Agency, project No. 1.13.


  1. 1.
    Manifesto for Agile Software Development.
  2. 2.
    Martenson, A.: Produsing and consuming agility. In: Desouza, K.C. (ed) Agile Information Systems, pp. 41–51 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoda, R., Salleh, N., Grundy, J., Tee, H.M.: Systematic literature reviews in agile software development: a tertiary study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 85, 60–70 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nurdiani, I., Börstler, J., Fricker, S.A.: The impacts of agile and lean practices on project constraints: a tertiary study. J. Syst. Softw. 119, 162–183 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alahyari, H., Berntsson Svensson, R., Gorschek, T.: A study of value in agile software development organizations. J. Syst. Softw. 125, 271–288 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Behutiye, W.N., Rodríguez, P., Oivo, M., Tosun, A.: Analyzing the concept of technical debt in the context of agile software development: a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 82, 139–158 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Walraven, S., Van Landuyt, D., Truyen, E., Handekyn, K., Joosen, W.: Efficient customization of multi-tenant Software-as-a-Service applications with service lines. J. Syst. Softw. 91, 48–62 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kratzke, N., Quint, P.-C.: Understanding cloud-native applications after 10 years of cloud computing - a systematic mapping study. J. Syst. Softw. 126, 1–16 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vakili, A., Navimipour, N.J.: Comprehensive and systematic review of the service composition mechanisms in the cloud environments. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 81, 24–36 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, R.R., Ravichandar, R., Proctor, D.: Managing the transition to the new agile business and product development model: lessons from cisco systems. Business Horizons. 59, 635–644 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kirikova, M., Salna, E.: Triple-Agile: cloud solutions for SMEs. In: Johansson, B., Møller, C., Chaudhuri, A., Sudzina, F. (eds.) BIR 2017. LNBIP, vol. 295, pp. 260–267. Springer, Cham (2017). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-64930-6_19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    The European Cloud Initiative|Digital Single Market.
  15. 15.
    Salleh, S.M., Teoh, S.Y., Chan, C.: Cloud enterprise systems: a review of literature and its adoption. In: PACIS 2012 Proceedings (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eurostat: Cloud computing services used by one out of every five enterprises in the EU28.
  17. 17.
    Yeboah-Boateng, E.O., Essandoh, K.A.: Cloud computing: the level of awareness amongst small & medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in developing economies. J. Emerg. Trends Comput. Inf. Sci. 4, 832–839 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vasiljeva, T., Shaikhulina, S., Kreslins, K.: Cloud computing: business perspectives, benefits and challenges for small and medium enterprises (case of Latvia). Procedia Eng. 178, 443–451 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Technology Institute: Building Enterprise Agility.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Process Classification Framework|APQC.
  22. 22.
    Rostami, A.: Tools and techniques in risk identification: a research within SMEs in the UK construction industry. Univ. J. Manag. 4, 203–210 (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ekwere, N.: Framework of effective risk management in small and medium enterprises (SMESs): a literature review. Bina Ekonomi. 20, 23–44 (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Verbano, C., Venturini, K.: Managing risks in SMEs: a literature review and research agenda. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 8, 186–197 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boubala, H.G.O.: Risk management of SMMEs (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    5 free tools for governance, risk management and compliance.
  27. 27.
    Top 20 Risk Management Software 2017 - Compare Reviews.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ligita Businska
    • 1
  • Maris Dargis
    • 1
  • Marite Kirikova
    • 1
    Email author
  • Edgars Salna
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Artifical Intelligence and Systems EngineeringRiga Technical UniversityRigaLatvia
  2. 2.Datorzinibu centrs, SIARigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations