Skip to main content

Metadata

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modern Data Strategy

Abstract

“Organizations that don’t know what information they have, or need, are unable to leverage information as an asset.” Metadata ensures data is visible, trusted, and usable. Metadata also facilitates data sharing. One might ask: Is data “shared” if it’s exchanged or published without the necessary metadata to understand it? Data should be shared. This is a recognized data management principle. After all, the value of data is limited when it remains in isolated pockets built to meet local needs. Shared, integrated data results in consistent and improved decisions and customer service. There is general agreement that data is only “shared” if the metadata necessary to understand and use it effectively is also provided. This has implications for the importance of metadata management programs and also for data governance and for “open” datasets published by the government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    De Simoni, G., “The Growth of the Metadata Management Tool Market is a Reality,” Gartner, March 24, 2016.

  2. 2.

    Burbank, R., “Emerging Trends in Metadata Management: A Dataversity® 2016 Report on the Top Business & Technical Drivers for Metadata,” Dataversity Education, LLC, 2016.

  3. 3.

    Beyer, T., Lapkin, G., & De Simoni, G., “Gartner Clarifies the Definition of Metadata,” Gartner, August 13, 2014.

  4. 4.

    CMMI Institute, “Data Management Maturity (DMM) Model,” Chapter on “Metadata Management,” Ver. 1.0, August 2014.

  5. 5.

    Beyer, T., Lapkin, G., & De Simoni, G., “Gartner Clarifies the Definition of Metadata,” Gartner, August 13, 2014.

  6. 6.

    Leganza, G., ‘Information Strategies Move Center Stage,” Forrester Research, Inc., May 20, 2013.

  7. 7.

    De Simoni, G., “How Metadata Improves Business Opportunities and Threats,” Gartner, August 13, 2014.

  8. 8.

    De Simoni, G., “How Metadata Improves Business Opportunities and Threats,” Gartner, August 13, 2014.

  9. 9.

    Burbank, R., “Emerging Trends in Metadata Management: A Dataversity®2016 Report on the Top Business & Technical Drivers for Metadata,” Dataversity Education, LLC, 2016.

  10. 10.

    Beyer, T., Lapkin, G., & De Simoni, G., “Gartner Clarifies the Definition of Metadata,” Gartner, August 13 2014.

  11. 11.

    De Simoni, G., “How Metadata Improves Business Opportunities and Threats,” Gartner, August 13, 2014.

  12. 12.

    De Simoni, G., “How Metadata Improves Business Opportunities and Threats,” Gartner, August 13, 2014.

  13. 13.

    The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, or “DCMI,” is an open organization supporting innovation in metadata design and best practices across the metadata ecology. For more information, see http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/.

  14. 14.

    The W3C Web Ontology Language (OWL) is a Semantic Web language designed to represent rich and complex knowledge about things, groups of things, and relations between things. For more information, see https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/OWL.

  15. 15.

    Stewart, D., “Automatic Classification and Tagging Make Metadata Manageable for ECM and Search,” Gartner, August 5, 2015.

  16. 16.

    De Simoni, G., “Metadata Is the Fish Finder in Data Lakes,” Gartner, October 5, 2015.

  17. 17.

    De Simoni, G., “Overcoming the Challenges to Implementing Enterprise Metadata Management Across the Organization,” Gartner, Refreshed August 27, 2014. Published August 14, 2012.

  18. 18.

    De Simoni, G., “The Growth of the Metadata Management Tool Market is a Reality,” Gartner, March 24, 2016.

  19. 19.

    Burbank, R., & Row, C., “Emerging Trends in Metadata Management,” Dataversity Education, LLC, 2016.

  20. 20.

    For more information on the phases of eDiscovery and the Electronic Discovery Reference Model, see, www.edrm.net.

  21. 21.

    Duncan, L., & De Simoni, G., “How Chief Data Officers Can Use an Information Catalog to Maximize Business Value from Information Assets,” Gartner, May 6, 2016.

  22. 22.

    Stewart, D., “Automatic Classification and Tagging Make Metadata Manageable for ECM and Search,” Gartner, August 5, 2015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fleckenstein, M., Fellows, L. (2018). Metadata. In: Modern Data Strategy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68993-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68993-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68992-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68993-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics