Advertisement

A Business English Course in the Digital Era: Design and Analysis

  • Lidia Taillefer
Chapter
Part of the English Language Education book series (ELED, volume 10)

Abstract

This research reconsiders the design of a business English course in the digital era, taking into account previous experience both of classroom-based and online learning. After experiencing traditional educational limitations, new technological advantages and student and teacher surveys, we showed that we should follow an integrated approach, as it is more enriching and effective. The objective was to develop a course adapted to the needs and preferences of current learners. A blended methodology is the best option, based on our analyses of all the fundamental aspects for ESP curriculum development: students’ needs, specialised discourse, methodology, course content, resources and activities. As the hardest areas to tackle are oral skills, we used online resources, activities and tools (such as Moodle, Skype and podcasts) that were made possible by a plan for technology implementation in our university. Finally, we analysed not only the benefits in the design of a blended course, but also the technological problems associated with the resources, providing digital recommendations to help make them more productive.

Keywords

Business English Classroom learning Online learning Integrated approach Needs analysis Blended methodology ESP curriculum Online resources Skype Podcasts 

References

  1. Alcaraz Varó, E. (2000). El inglés profesional y académico. Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
  2. Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific courses. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belcher, D. D. (2004). Trends in teaching English for specific purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blake, R. (2008). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cotton, D., Falvey, D., & Kent, S. (2011). Market leader. Essex: Pearson.Google Scholar
  6. Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Department for Education and Training. (2003). Blended learning. New South Wales: DET.Google Scholar
  8. Dörnyei, Z. (2001). New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Facer, B., Abdous, M., & Camarena, M. (2009). The impact of podcasting on students’ learning outcomes. In R. Marriott & P. Torres (Eds.), Handbook of research on e-learning methodologies for language acquisition (pp. 339–351). Hershey: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fortanet-Gómez, I., & Räisänen, C. A. (2008). ESP in European higher education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. García-Mayo, M. P. (2000). English for specific purposes: Discourse analysis and course design. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco.Google Scholar
  13. Heinze, A. and Procter, C. (2004). Reflections on the use of blended learning. Proceedings of Conference on Education in a Changing Environment. Salford: University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, L. (2008). Listening comprehension technology: Building the bridge from analog to digital. CALICO, 25(3), 400–419.Google Scholar
  16. Kitkauskiené, L. (2006). General English and English for specific purposes. Santalka Filología Edukologica, 14(2), 88–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, M. J. W., & Chan, A. (2007). Pervasive, lifestyle-integrated mobile learning for distance learners: An analysis and unexpected results from a podcasting study. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 22(3), 201–218.Google Scholar
  19. Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 769–782. doi: 0026-7902/09/769-782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Little, P. (1990). Communication in business. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  21. Lopez-Ozieblo, R. (2013). Reflections on the use of nonverbal communication in teaching Spanish to Sino-speakers. Revista de lenguas para fines específicos, 19, 321–340.Google Scholar
  22. Mascull, B. (2002). Business vocabulary in use. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Miranda, H. (2002). La cortesía verbal y su implicancia en la enseñanza del inglés como lengua extranjera. In J. M. Ruiz, P. Sheering, & C. Estébanez (Coords.), Metodología de la lengua inglesa (Vol. 2, pp. 155–164). Universidad de Valladolid.Google Scholar
  24. Montero, B. (1988). Características de un curso de Inglés para Fines Específicos en contraste con el de Inglés General. Atlantis, X(2), 123–130.Google Scholar
  25. Morrison, T., & Conaway, W. (2006). Kiss, bow, or shake hands (2nd ed.). Avon: Adams Media.Google Scholar
  26. Mullen, T., Appel, C., & Shanklin, T. (2009). Skype-based tandem language learning and web 2.0. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 101–118). Information Science Reference: Hershey.  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-190-2.ch006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pasquali, A. (1990). Comprender la comunicación. Caracas: Monte Ávila Latinoamericana.Google Scholar
  28. Procter, C. (2003). Blended learning in practice. Proceedings of Conference on Education in a Changing Environment. Salford: University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rao, P. (2007). Skype as a language-learning tool: the GW Hatchet. http://www.gwhatchet.com/2007/01/29/skype-as-a-language-learning-tool. Accessed 28 Dec 2016.
  30. Remacha, S., & Marco, E. (2007). Professional English in use. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Rusling, M. (2007). Learn a foreign language—Over the Web. The Christian Science Monitor. http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0816/p13s02-legn.html. Accessed 27 Aug 2016.
  32. Santhanam, L., Mitchell, A., & Rosenstiel, T. (2012). Audio—how far will digital go? Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism: the state of the news media, an annual report on American journalism. http://stateofthemedia.org/2012/audio-how-far-will-digital-go. Accessed 26 Aug 2013.
  33. Strevens, P. (1988). ESP after 20 years: A re-appraisal. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), ESP state of the art (pp. 1–20). Singapore: Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization Regional Language Centre (SEAMEO RELC).Google Scholar
  34. Taillefer, L., & Muñoz-Luna, R. (2011). Online glossary of English applied linguistics. In S. Maruenda-Bataller & B. Clavel-Arroitia (Eds.), Multiple voices in academic and professional discourse: Current issues in specialised language research, teaching and new technologies. New Castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Taillefer, L., & Muñoz-Luna, R. (2013). Technology implementation in language teaching: Analysis of ICTs in teaching English as a foreign language. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies: A Section of The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 7(1), 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taillefer, L., & Muñoz-Luna, R. (2014). Developing oral skills through skype: A language project analysis. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences (4th World Conference on Learning, teaching and educational leadership), 141, 260–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.045.Google Scholar
  37. Trudgill, P. (Ed.). (1984). Applied sociolinguistics. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Viswanathan, R. (2009). Using mobile technology and podcasts to teach soft skills. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 223–236). Hershey: Information Science Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson, B. G. (Ed.). (1996). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of English, French and GermanUniversity of MalagaMalagaSpain

Personalised recommendations