Advertisement

The Sustainable Management of Soils as a Common Concern of Humankind: How to Implement It?

  • Harald Ginzky
Chapter
Part of the International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy book series (IYSLP, volume 2017)

Abstract

The chapter analyzes whether the sustainable management of soils can be regarded as a common concern of humankind. It shows that there are strong arguments to support this assumption from a factual and scientific point of view. Furthermore, the chapter shows that decisions adopted at the international level underline that this is also politically acceptable. A legally binding agreement is, however, not yet in place. The chapter then asks what implementation tools and approaches could be suitable with regard to sustainable management of soils. This seems to be particularly complex because, first, at least eight different types of soil threats must be differentiated; second, the political and economic realities worldwide are different; and, third, the types of soils are almost uncountable. The chapter provides arguments that instruments applied within the bounds of the CBD could be transportable to the sustainable management of soils. Moreover, looking to the regime of the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) on Deep Seabed Mining in the Area, two different conceptual approaches on how to ensure implementation are identified. The chapter provides arguments that the approach to precisely determine the international obligations would be suitable for the sustainable management of soils provided that a certain degree of flexibility is applied.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Ralph Bodle, Beth Dooley, Ian Hannam, Irene Heuser, Till Markus and Pradeep Singh for very constructive comments. Errors and omissions are the sole responsibility of the author.

References

  1. Birnie P, Redgwell C, Boyle A (2009) International law and the environment, 3rd ednGoogle Scholar
  2. Boer B (2014) Land degradation as a common concern of humankind. In: Lenzerini F, Vrdoljak F (eds) International law for common goods, pp 289–307Google Scholar
  3. Boer B, Hannam I (2003) Legal aspects of the sustainable soils. Rev Eur Community Int Environ Law 12(2):149–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boer B, Ginzky H, Heuser I (2016) International soil protection law: history, concepts and latest developments. In: International yearbook of soil law and policy, pp 49–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowling C, Pierson E, Ratté S (2016) The common concern of humankind: a potential framework for a new international legally binding instrument on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in the high seas. White Paper, 1–15, under: http://www.un.org/depts/los/biodiversity/prepcom_files/BowlingPiersonandRatte_Common_Concern.pdf
  6. Cottier T, Aerni P, Karapinar B, Matteotti S, de SEphibus J, Shingai A (2014) The principle of common concern and climate change. Archiv des Völkerrechts 52:293–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehlers K (2016) Chances and challenges in using the sustainable development goals as a new instrument for global action against soil degradation. In: International yearbookof soil law and policy, pp 73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eikermann A (2014) Der Wald im internationalen Recht: Defizite, Regelungsoptionen und Mindestanforderungen. Rechtsgutachten im Auftrag des Bundesamtes für NaturschutzGoogle Scholar
  9. EU Commission (2006) Communication: Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection, COM(2006)231 finalGoogle Scholar
  10. EU Commission (2012) Report: The implementation of the Soil Thematic Strategy and ongoing activities, COM (2012) 46 finalGoogle Scholar
  11. Flasbarth J (2016) Soils need international governance: a European perspective for the first volume of the international yearbook of soil law and policy. In: International yearbook of soil law and policy, pp 15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ginzky H (2016) Bodenschutz weltweit – Konzeptionelle Überlegungen für ein internationales Regime. Handbuch Boden, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  13. Ginzky H, Damian H (2017) Bergbau am Tiefseeboden – Standards und Verfahren für einen effektiven Schutz der Umwelt. Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht, pp 323–331Google Scholar
  14. Hannam I, Boer B (2002) Legal and Institutional Frameworks for sustainable use of soils. IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 45.Google Scholar
  15. Jaeckel A (2015) An environmental management strategy for the international seabed authority? The legal basis. Int J Mar Coast Law 30:93–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Linz F, Lobos I (2016) Boden und Land in der internationalen Nachhaltigkeitspolitik – von der globalen Agenda zur lokalen Umsetzung. Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht, pp 195–199Google Scholar
  17. Markus T, Singh S (2016) Promoting consistency in the deep seabed: addressing regulatory dimensions in designing the international seabed authority’s exploitation code. Rev Eur Community Int Environ Law 25:347–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Minelli S, Erlewein A, Castillo V (2016) Land degradation neutrality and the UNCCD: from political vision to measurable targets. In: International yearbook of soil law and policy, pp 85–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morgera E, Tsioumani E (2010) Yesterday, today and tomorrow: looking afresh at the convention on biological diversity. Yearb Int Environ Law 21:3–40Google Scholar
  20. Sanchez Castillo-Winckels N (2017) Why “Common Concern of Humankind” should return to the work of the International Law Commission on the Atmosphere. Georgetown Environ Law Rev 29:131–151Google Scholar
  21. Shelton D (2009) Common concern of humanity. Environ Policy Law 39:83–96Google Scholar
  22. Streck C, Gay A (2016) The role of soils in international climate change policy. In: International yearbook of soil law and policy, pp 105–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tanaka Y (2015) Obligations and liability of sponsoring states concerning activities in the area: reflections on the ITLOS advisory opinion of 1 February 2011. Neth Int Law Rev 60:205–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. United Nations (2012) General Assembly, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 11 September 2012, 66/288, The Future We WantGoogle Scholar
  25. United Nations (2015) General Assembly, Seventieth Session, No. 11688, Agenda items 15 and 116, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, ‘Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development’, A/RES/70/1, p 1Google Scholar
  26. Wolff F, Kaphengst T (2016) The UN convention on biological diversity and soils: status and future options. In: International yearbook of soil law and policy, pp 129–148Google Scholar
  27. Wunder S, Kaphengst T, Freilih-Larsen A (2017)Implementing land degradation neutrality (SDG 15.3) at national level: general approach, indicator selection and experiences from Germany. International yearbook of soil law and policyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.German Environment AgencyDessauGermany

Personalised recommendations