Import Regulations and Certification as a Means to Enforce Sustainable Agriculture Abroad

Chapter
Part of the International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy book series (IYSLP, volume 2017)

Abstract

Bioenergy, used for the mitigation of climate change, has in recent years increased the pressure on land and thereby on agriculture, natural and near natural habitats. The European Union Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/EU establishes for the first time environmental limitations that not only impact the drafting of climate change policy but also are specifically aimed at regulating its impact. Biofuels and bioliquids can only be supported by the States if they comply with certain limitations on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and requirements on the protection of biodiversity. Although several issues are not sufficiently addressed, such as socio-economic issues or indirect land-use changes, the mechanism can nonetheless serve as a blueprint for regulation in other sectors. This is particularly true for the recognition mechanism, which benchmarks voluntary certification standards against the sustainability criteria. Valuable experiences may be drawn both for the design of certification systems and for the requirements on meta-standards.

References

  1. Aguirre GJ (2009) Why cutting down trees is part of the problem, but planting trees isn’t always part of the solution – how concepualizing forests as sinks can work against Kyoto. Or Rev Int Law 11:205–224Google Scholar
  2. Bowyer (2011) Anticipated indirect land use change associated with expanded use of biofuels and bioliquids in the EU – an analysis of the National Renewable Energy Action Plans. Institute for European Environmental Policy, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bright RM, Cherubini F, Strømman AH (2012) Climate impacts of bioenergy: inclusion of carbon cycle and albedo dynamics in life cycle impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 36:2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cashore B et al (2005) Private or self-regulation? A comparative study of forest certification choices in Canada, the United States and Germany. Forest Policy Econ 7:53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deaton BJ (2004) A theoretical framework for examining the role of third-party certifiers. Food Control 15:615–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deininger K et al (2011) Rising global interest in farmland: can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits? World Bank, Washington. 13 foll., 163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. European Commission, Renewable Energy Progress Report 2017, COM (2017), 57Google Scholar
  8. European Commission Energy Road Map 2050 COM 2011 885 finalGoogle Scholar
  9. European Court of Auditors, The EU system for the certification of sustainable biofuels, special report no. 18, 2016Google Scholar
  10. Fonseca MB et al (2010) Impacts of the EU biofuel target on agricultural markets and land use. JRC, SevilleGoogle Scholar
  11. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) (2008) Soaring food prices: facts, perspectives, impacts and actions required. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. German L, Schoneveld GC (2011) Social sustainability of EU-approved certification schemes for biofuels. CIFOR, BogorGoogle Scholar
  13. German L, Schoneveld GC, Pacheco P (2011) Local social and environmental impacts of biofuels: global comparative assessment and implications for governance. Ecol Soc 16:Art. 29: 4 follGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldemberg J, Coelho ST, Guardabassi P (2008) The sustainability of ethanol production from sugarcane. Energy Policy 36:2086–2097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guénéau S, Tozzi P (2008) Towards the privatisation of global forest governance? Int Forestry Rev 10:550–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007 – mitigation of climate change – Working Group III contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report Cambridge. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Jumbe CBL, Msiska FBM, Madjera M (2009) Biofuels development in sub-Saharan Africa: are the policies conducive? Energy Policy 37(11):4980–4986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lamers P et al (2011) International bioenergy trade – a review of past developments in the liquid biofuel market. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:2655–2676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matus K (2010) Assessing challenges for implementation of biofuels sustainability criteria – workshop report. UNEP, Inter-American Development Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. McDermott CL, Noah E, Cashore B (2007) Differences that ‘matter’? A framework for comparing environmental certification standards and government policies. J Environ Policy Plan 10:47–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. OECD – Round Table on Sustainable Development (2007) Biofules: is the cure worse than the disease? OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  22. Oxfam UK (2007) Bio-fuelling poverty – why the EU renewable-fuel target may be disastrous for poor people. LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosillo-Calle F (2007) Overview of bioenergy. Introduction. In: Rosillo-Calle F et al (eds) The biomass assessment handbook: bioenergy for a sustainable environment. Earthscan, London, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  24. Selznick P (1985) Focussing organizational research on regulation Chap. 11. In: Noll RG (ed) Regulatory policy and the social sciences. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 363–364Google Scholar
  25. van Dam J, Junginger M, Faaij APC (2010) From the global efforts on certification of bioenergy towards an integrated approach based on sustainable land use planning. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:2445–2472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. van Stappen F, Brose I, Schenkel Y (2011) Direct and indirect land use changes issues in European sustainability initiatives: state-of-the-art, open issues and future developments. Biomass Bioenerg 35(12):4824–4834: 4829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Worldwatch Institute (2007) Biofuels for transport – global potential and implications for sustainable energy and agriculture. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang Z (2008) Asian energy and environmental policy: promoting growth while preserving the environment. Energy Policy 36(10):3905–3924CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arnecke SibethBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations