An FE\(^2\)-Scheme for Magneto-Electro-Mechanically Coupled Boundary Value Problems

  • Matthias Labusch
  • Jörg Schröder
  • Marc-André Keip
Chapter
Part of the CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 581)

Abstract

The magneto-electric coupling in materials can find several applications in future technologies and could furthermore improve devices, for instance in data storage media. Since all natural single-phase magneto-electric (ME) multiferroics and most of the synthetic single-phase ME materials show a magneto-electric coupling far below room temperature, composite materials are manufactured which consist of a ferroelectric and a magnetostrictive phase. Both phases interact with each other in consequence of transferred deformations, such that these composites produce strain-induced ME properties at room temperature. In order to predict a realistic material behavior, it is necessary to implement appropriate numerical models to reflect the natural behavior of the single phases. This chapter will focus on the numerical implementation of different numerical models for the description of ferroic materials into the two-scale finite element homogenization approach (FE\(^2\)-method) for the simulation of magneto-electro-mechanically coupled boundary value problems. In detail, we investigate the magneto-electric response in consideration of piezoelectric, electrostrictive and ferroelectric models in combination with a piezomagnetic phase. Reliable results for the ME coefficient are obtained by using a ferroelectric model which takes into account the microscopic properties over single tetragonal unit cells, which are allocated in the three dimensional space based on an orientation distribution function. As a result of switching-events of microscopic polarization vectors, we obtain the macroscopic dielectric and butterfly hysteresis curves of the ferroelectric phase. Thereby, the model for the computations of the ME coefficient is physically motivated.

References

  1. Al’shin, B. I., & Astrov, D. N. (1963). Magnetoelectric effect in titanium oxide Ti\(_2\)O\(_3\). Soviet Physics JETP, 17, 809–811.Google Scholar
  2. Ascher, E., Rieder, H., Schmid, H., & Stössel, H. (1966). Some properties of ferromagnetoelectric nickel-iodine boracite, Ni\(_3\)B\(_7\)O\(_{13}\)I. Journal of Applied Physics, 37, 1404–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Astrov, D. N. (1960). The magnetoelectric effect in antiferromagnetics. Soviet Physics JETP, 38, 984–985.Google Scholar
  4. Astrov, D. N. (1961). Magnetoelectric effect in chromium oxide. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 40, 1035–1041.Google Scholar
  5. Bibes, M., & Barthélémy, A. (2008). Multiferroics: Towards a magnetoelectric memory. Nature Materials, 7(6), 425–426. ISSN 1476-1122.Google Scholar
  6. Bichurin, M. I., Petrov, V. M., & Srinivasan, G. (2003). Theory of low-frequency magnetoelectric coupling in magnetostrictive-piezoelectric bilayers. Physical Review B, 68, 054402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bichurin, M. I., Petrov, V. M., Averkin, S. V., & Liverts, E. (2010). Present status of theoretical modeling the magnetoelectric effect in magnetostrictive-piezoelectric nanostructures. Part I: Low frequency and electromechanical resonance ranges. Journal of Applied Physics, 107(5), 053904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheong, S.-W., & Mostovoy, M. (2007). Multiferroics: A magnetic twist for ferroelectricity. Nature Materials, 6(1), 13–20. ISSN 1476-1122.Google Scholar
  9. Crottaz, O., Rivera, J.-P., Revaz, B., & Schmid, H. (1997). Magnetoelectric effect of Mn\(_3\)B\(_7\)O\(_{13}\)I boracite. Ferroelectrics, 204, 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Debye, P. (1926). Bemerkung zu einigen neuen versuchen über einen magneto-elektrischen richteffekt. Zeitschrift für Physik, 36, 300–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dzyaloshinskii, I. E. (1959). On the magneto-electrical effect in antiferromagnets. Soviet Physics Jetp-Ussr, 37, 881–882.Google Scholar
  12. Eerenstein, W., Mathur, N. D., & Scott, J. F. (2006). Multiferroic and magnetoelectric materials. Nature, 442(7104), 759–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eerenstein, W., Wiora, M., Prieto, J. L., Scott, J. F., & Mathur, N. D. (2007). Giant sharp and persistent converse magnetoelectric effects in multiferroic epitaxial heterostructures. Nature Materials, 6(5), 348–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Etier, M., Shvartsman, V. V., Gao, Y., Landers, J., Wende, H., & Lupascu, D. C. (2013). Magnetoelectric effect in (0–3) CoFe2O4-BaTiO3 (20/80) composite ceramics prepared by the organosol route. Ferroelectrics, 448, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feyel, F., & Chaboche, J.-L. (2000). FE\(^2\) multiscale approach for modelling the elastoviscoplastic behavior of long fibre SiC/Ti composite materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 183, 309–330.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Fiebig, M. (2005). Revival of the magnetoelectric effect. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 38, R123–R152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Folen, V. J., Rado, G. T., & Stalder, E. W. (1961). Anisotropy of the magnetoelectric effect in Cr\(_2\)O\(_3\). Physical Review Letters, 6, 607–608.Google Scholar
  18. Fuller, R. B. (1965). Geodesic Structures.Google Scholar
  19. Harshé, G., Dougherty, J. P., & Newnham, R. E. (1993a). Theoretical modeling of multilayer magnetoelectric composites. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics in Materials, 4, 145–159.Google Scholar
  20. Harshé, G., Dougherty, J. P., & Newnham, R. E. (1993b). Theoretical modeling of 3–0/0-3 magnetoelectric composites. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics in Materials, 4, 161–171.Google Scholar
  21. Hill, N. A. (2000). Why are there so few magnetic ferroelectrics? Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 104, 6694–6709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hill, R. (1963). Elastic properties of reinforced solids - some theoretical principles. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 11, 357–372.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Howes, B., Pelizzone, M., Fischer, P., Tabares-Munoz, C., Rivera, J.-P., & Schmid, H. (1984). Characterization of some magnetic and magnetoelectric properties of ferroelectric Pb(Fe\(_{0.5}\)Nb\(_{0.5}\))O\(_3\). Ferroelectrics, 54, 317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang, J. H., & Kuo, W.-S. (1997). The analysis of piezoelectric/piezomagnetic composite materials containing ellipsoidal inclusions. Journal of Applied Physics, 81, 1378–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hwang, S. C., Lynch, C. S., & McMeeking, R. M. (1995). Ferroelectric/ferroelastic interaction and a polarization switching model. Acta Metallurgica et Materialia, 43, 2073–2084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Javili, A., Chatzigeorgiou, G., & Steinmann, P. (2013). Computational homogenization in magneto-mechanics. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 50, 4197–4216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jayachandran, K. P., Guedes, J. M., & Rodrigues, H. C. (2013). A generic homogenization model for magnetoelectric multiferroics. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures.Google Scholar
  28. Jin, K., & Aboudi, J. (2015). Macroscopic behavior prediction of multiferroic composites. International Journal of Engineering Science, 94, 226–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keip, M.-A. (2012). Modeling of electro-mechanically coupled materials on multiple scales. Ph.D. thesis, University of Duisburg-Essen.Google Scholar
  30. Keip, M.-A., & Rambausek, M. (2016). A multiscale approach to the computational characterization of magnetotheological elastomers. International Journal For Numerical Methods In Engineering, 107, 338–360.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Keip, M.-A., & Rambausek, M. (2017). Computational and analytical investigation of shape effects in the experimental characterization of magnetorheological elastomers. International Journal of Solids and Structures.Google Scholar
  32. Keip, M.-A., Steinmann, P.,& Schröder, J. (2014). Two-scale computational homogenization of electro-elasticity at finite strains. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 278, 62–79. ISSN 0045-7825.Google Scholar
  33. Khomskii, D. (2009). Classifying multiferroics: Mechanisms and effects. Physics, 2, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kouznetsova, V., Brekelmans, W. A. M., & Baaijens, F. P. T. (2001). An approach to micro-macro modeling of heterogeneous materials. Computational Mechanics, 27, 37–48.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Kouznetsova, V., Geers, M. G. D., & Brekelmans, W. A. M. (2002). Multi-scale constitutive modelling of heterogeneous materials with a gradient-enhanced computational homogenization scheme. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 54(8), 1235–1260.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Kuo, H.-Y., & Wang, Y.-L. (2012). Optimization of magnetoelectricity in multiferroic fibrous composites. Mechanics of Materials, 50, 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kurzhöfer, I., Schröder, J., & Romanowski, H. (2005). Simulation of polycrystalline ferroelectrics based on discrete orientation distribution functions. Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 5, 307–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Labusch, M., Etier, M., Lupascu, D. C., Schröder, J., & Keip, M.-A. (2014). Product properties of a two-phase magneto-electric composite: Synthesis and numerical modeling. Computational Mechanics, 54, 71–83.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Landau, L. D., & Lifshitz, E. M. (1960). Electrodynamics of continuous media. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lee, J. S., Boyd, J. G., & Lagoudas, D. C. (2005). Effective properties of three-phase electro-magneto-elastic composites. International Journal Of Engineering Science, 43(10), 790–825.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Mandel, J., & Dantu, P. (1963). Conribution à l’étude théorique et expérimentale du coefficient d’élasticité d’un milieu hétérogène mais statistiquement homogène. Annales des Ponts et Chaussées.Google Scholar
  42. Martin, L. W., Chu, Y.-H.,& Ramesh, R. (2010). Advances in the growth and characterization of magnetic, ferroelectric, and multiferroic oxide thin films. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 68(46), 89–133. ISSN 0927-796X.Google Scholar
  43. Maugin, G. A., Pouget, J., Drouot, R., & Collet, B. (1992). Nonlinear electromechanical couplings. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Miehe, C. (2003). Computational micro-to-macro transitions for discretized micro-structures of heterogeneous materials at finite strains based on the minimization of averaged incremental energy. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 192, 559–591.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. Miehe, C., & Bayreuther, C. G. (2007). On mutiscale FE analyses of heterogeneous structures: from homogenization to multigrid solvers. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 71, 1135–1180.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. Miehe, C., & Koch, A. (2002). Computational micro-to-macro transitions of discretized microstructures undergoing small strains. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 72, 300–317.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Miehe, C., Schotte, J., & Schröder, J. (1999a). Computational micro-macro transitions and overall moduli in the analysis of polycrystals at large strains. Computational Materials Science, 16(1–4), 372–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miehe, C., Schröder, J., & Schotte, J. (1999b). Computational homogenization analysis in finite plasticity. Simulation of texture development in polycrystalline materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 171, 387–418.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. Miehe, C., Rosato, D., & Kiefer, B. (2011). Variational principles in dissipative electro-magneto-mechanics: A framework for the macro-modeling of functional materials. International Journal For Numerical Methods In Engineering, 86, 1225–1276.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. Nan, C.-W. (1994). Magnetoelectric effect in composites of piezoelectric and piezomagnetic phases. Physical Review B, 50, 6082–6088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nan, C.-W., Liu, G., Lin, Y.,& Chen, H. (2005). Magnetic-field-induced electric polarization in multiferroic nanostructures. Physical Review Letters, 94(19), 197203. 1–4 May 2005.Google Scholar
  52. Nan, C.-W., Bichurin, M. I., Dong, S., Viehland, D., & Srinivasan, G. (2008). Multiferroic magnetoelectric composites: Historical perspective, status, and future directions. Journal of Applied Physics, 103(3), 031101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. O’Dell, T. H. (1967). An induced magneto-electric effect in yttrium iron garnet. Philosophical Magazine, 16, 487–494.Google Scholar
  54. Özdemir, I., Brekelmans, W. A. M., & Geers, M. G. D. (2008). Computational homogenization for heat conduction in heterogeneous solids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 73, 185–204.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. Perić, D., de Souza Neto, E. A., Feijóo, R. A., Partovi, M., & Carneiro Molina, A. J. (2011). On micro-to-macro transitions for multi-scale analysis of non-linear heterogeneous materials. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 87, 149–170.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. Priya, S., Islam, R., Dong, S. X., & Viehland, D. (2007). Recent advancements in magnetoelectric particulate and laminate composites. Journal of Electroceramics, 19(1), 147–164.Google Scholar
  57. Rado, G. T. (1964). Observation and possible mechanisms of magnetoelectric effects in a ferromagnet. Physical Review Letters, 13, 335–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rado, G. T., & Folen, V. J. (1961). Observation of the magentically induced magnetoelectric effect and evidence for antiferromagnetic domains. Physical Review Letters, 7, 310–311.Google Scholar
  59. Rado, G. T., Ferrari, J. M., & Maisch, W. G. (1984). Magnetoelectric susceptibility and magnetic symmetry of magnetoelectrically annealed TbPO\(_4\). Physical Review B, 29, 4041–4048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ramesh, R., & Spaldin, N. A. (2007). Multiferroics: Progress and prospects in thin films. Nature Materials, 6(1), 21–29. ISSN 1476-1122.Google Scholar
  61. Rivera, J.-P. (1994a). On definitions, units, measurements, tensor forms of the linear magnetoelectric effect and on a new dynamic method applied to Cr-Cl boracite. Ferroelectrics, 161, 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rivera, J.-P. (1994b). The linear magnetoelectric effect in LiCoPO\(_4\) revisited. Ferroelectrics, 161, 147–164.Google Scholar
  63. Rivera, J.-P., & Schmid, H. (1997). On the birefringence of magnetoelectric BiFeO\(_3\). Ferroelectrics, 204, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Röntgen, W. C. (1888). Ueber die durch bewegung eines im homogenen electrischen felde befindlichen dielectricums hervorgerufene electrodynamische kraft. Annalen der Physik, 271, 264–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ryu, J., Priya, S., Uchino, K., & Kim, H. E. (2002). Magnetoelectric effect in composites of magnetostrictive and piezoelectric materials. Journal of Electroceramics, 8, 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schmid, H. (1994). Multi-ferroic magnetoelectrics. Ferroelectrics, 162, 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schröder, J. (2009). Derivation of the localization and homogenization conditions for electro-mechanically coupled problems. Computational Materials Science, 46(3), 595–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schröder, J. (2014). A numerical two-scale homogenization scheme: The FE\(^2\)–method. In J. Schröder, & K. Hackl (Eds.), Plasticity and Beyond (Vol. 550, pp. 1–64). CISM Courses and Lectures. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  69. Schröder, J., & Gross, D. (2004). Invariant formulation of the electromechanical enthalpy function of transversely isotropic piezoelectric materials. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 73, 533–552.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  70. Schröder, J., & Keip, M.-A. (2012). Two-scale homogenization of electromechanically coupled boundary value problems. Computational Mechanics, 50, 229–244.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  71. Schröder, J., Labusch, M., & Keip, M.-A. (2016). Algorithmic two-scale transition for magneto-electro-mechanically coupled problems - FE\(^2\)-scheme: Localization and homogenization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 302, 253–280.Google Scholar
  72. Shi, Y., & Gao, Y. (2014). A nonlinear magnetoelectric model for magnetoelectric layered composite with coupling stress. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 360, 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shtrikman, S., & Treves, D. (1963). Observation of the magnetoelectric effect in Cr\(_2\)O\(_3\) powders. Physical Review, 130, 986–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shvartsman, V. V., Alawneh, F., Borisov, P., Kozodaev, D., & Lupascu, D. C. (2011). Converse magnetoelectric effect in CoFe\(_2\)O\(_4\)-BaTiO\(_3\) composites with a core-shell structure. Smart Materials and Structures, 20.Google Scholar
  75. Smit, R. J. M., Brekelmans, W. A. M., & Meijer, H. E. H. (1998). Prediction of the mechanical behavior of nonlinear heterogeneous systems by multi-level finite element modeling. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 155, 181–192.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  76. Spaldin, N. A., & Fiebig, M. (2005). The renaissance of magnetoelectric multiferroics. Science, 309, 391–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Srinivas, S., Li, J. Y., Zhou, Y. C., & Soh, A. K. (2006). The effective magnetoelectroelastic moduli of matrix-based multiferroic composites. Journal of Applied Physics, 99(4), 043905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Srinivasan, G. (2010). Magnetoelectric composites. Annual Review of Materials Research, 40, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sundar, V., & Newnham, R. E. (1992). Electrostriction and polarization. Ferroelectrics, 135, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Temizer, I., & Wriggers, P. (2008). On the computation of the macroscopic tangent for multiscale volumetric homogenization problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 198, 495–510.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  81. Terada, K., Hori, M., Kyoya, T., & Kikuchi, N. (2000). Simulation of the multi-scale convergence in computational homogenization approach. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 37, 2285–2311.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  82. Terada, K., Saiki, I., Matsui, K., & Yamakawa, Y. (2003). Two-scale kinematics and linearization for simultaneous two-scale analysis of periodic heterogeneous solids at finite strain. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 192(31–32), 3531–3563.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  83. van der Sluis, O., Schreurs, P. J. G., Brekelmans, W. A. M., & Meijer, H. E. H. (2000). Overall behavior of heterogeneous elastoviscoplastic materials: effect of microstructural modelling. Mechanics of Materials, 32, 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. van Suchtelen, J. (1972). Product properties: A new application of composite materials. Philips Research Reports, 27, 28–37.Google Scholar
  85. Vaz, C. A. F., Hoffman, J., Ahn, C. H., & Ramesh, R. (2010). Magnetoelectric coupling effects in multiferroic complex oxide composite structures. Advanced Materials, 22, 2900–2918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wang, Y., Hu, J., Lin, Y., & Nan, C.-W. (2010). Multiferroic magnetoelectric composite nanostructures. NPG asia materials, 2(2), 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Watanabe, T., & Kohn, K. (1989). Magnetoelectric effect and low temperature transition of PbFe\(_{0.5}\)Nb\(_{0.5}\)O\(_3\) single crystal. Phase Transitions, 15, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wilson, H. A. (1905). On the electric effect of rotating a dielectric in a magnetic field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 204, 121–137.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  89. Ye, Z.-G., Rivera, J.-P., Schmid, H., Haida, M., & Kohn, K. (1994). Magnetoelectric effect and magnetic torque of chromium chlorine boracite Cr\(_3\)B\(_7\)O\(_{13}\)Cl. Ferroelectrics, 161, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zgonik, M., Bernasconi, P., Duelli, M., Schlesser, R., & Günter, P. (1994). Dielectric, elastic, piezoelectric, electro-optic, and elasto-optic tensors of BaTiO\(_3\) crystals. Physical Review B, 50(9), 5941–5949.Google Scholar
  91. Zohdi, T. (2012). Electromagnetic properties of multiphase dielectrics - a primer on modeling, theory and computation. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  92. Zohdi, T. I. (2010). Simulation of coupled microscale multiphysical-fields in particulate-doped dielectrics with staggered adaptive fdtd. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199, 3250–3269.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Labusch
    • 1
  • Jörg Schröder
    • 1
  • Marc-André Keip
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of MechanicsUniversity of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Applied Mechanics (CE), Chair IUniversity of StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations