Skip to main content

Economics and Ethics after the 1950s

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 914 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we will provide a survey of approaches to methodological relationships between economics and ethics suggested by various economists and philosophers in the second half of the twentieth century. We will start with neoclassical divorce from ethics, then we will consider several authors who provided their variants of reconsidering this divorce and discuss methodologically strong and weak points in their suggestions. In the end we will summarize and provide several generalizations and ideas on collaboration of economics and ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the 1970, Amartya Sen published a paper, “The impossibility of Paretian Liberal” (Sen 1970), which explained a paradox—liberal choice led to Pareto-inefficient outcome. However, there was no paradox if we remember Coase’s theorem. It was just a limited understanding of liberal choice not assuming possibility contracts and compensation. The resolution of Sen’s paradox on the basis Coase’s theorem was shown few years later by A. Gibbard in his paper “A Pareto-consistent libertarian claim” (Gibbard 1974). If people can freely alienate their rights or negotiate compensations , the Pareto equilibrium may be achieved.

References

  • Arrow, K.J. 1969. The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Nonmarket Allocation. In The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PPB System, vol. 1, 47–64. Washington, DC: Joint Economic Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Anthony B. 2009. Economics as a Moral Science. Economica 76 (s1): 791–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Geoffrey. 2008. Lessons for Ethics from Economics? Philosophical Issues 18 (1): 249–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Geoffrey, and Giuseppe Eusepi, eds. 2009. The Economics of Ethics and the Ethics of Economics: Values, Markets and the State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome, John. 1999. Ethics Out of Economics. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome, John. 2009. Why Economics Needs Ethical Theory. In Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen. Volume I: Ethics, Welfare, and Measurement, ed. Ravi Kanbur and Kaushik Basu, 7–14. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, Luigino, and Robert Sugden. 2013. Reclaiming Virtue Ethics for Economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 27 (4): 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Allen E. 1985. Ethics, Efficiency, and the Market. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M., and Gordon Tullock. 1962. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, Ernst, and Simon Gächter. 2000. Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (3): 159–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, Allan. 1974. A Pareto-consistent Libertarian Claim. Journal of Economic Theory 7 (4): 388–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, John C. 1975. Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s theory. American Political Science Review 69 (2): 594–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Daniel M., and Michael S. McPherson. 1993. Taking Ethics Seriously: Economics and Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Journal of Economic Literature 31 (2): 671–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Daniel, and Michael McPherson. 2006. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Daniel, Michael McPherson, and Debra Satz. 2016. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, Edward P. 2000. Economic Imperialism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (1): 99–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letwin, William. 1963. The Origins of Scientific Economics: English Economic Thought; 1660–1776. Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, Michael S. 1988. Reuniting Economics and Philosophy. In The Boundaries of Economics, ed. G.C. Winston and R.F. Teichgraeber, 71–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. 5th ed. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary. 1993. Objectivity and the Science-ethics Distinction. In The Quality of Life, ed. Martha Nussbaum and Amartya Sen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, Alvin E., and Francoise Schoumaker. 1983. Expectations and Reputations in Bargaining: An Experimental Study. The American Economic Review 73 (3): 362–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1970. The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal. Journal of Political Economy 78 (1): 152–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiv, Baba, George Loewenstein, Antoine Bechara, Hanna Damasio, and Antonio R. Damasio. 2005. Investment Behavior and the Negative Side of Emotion. Psychological Science 16 (6): 435–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sraffa, Piero. 1960. Production of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George J. 1971. The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics II: 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Staveren, Irene. 2007. Beyond Utilitarianism and Deontology: Ethics in Economics. Review of Political Economy 19 (1): 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Communitarianism and the Market: A Paradox. Review of Social Economy 67 (1): 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, Douglas. 1997. Economics and Ethics: An Introduction to Theory, Institutions, and Policy. Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, V.C. 1987. Philosophy and Economics. In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, ed. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, vol. 3, 861–869. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Vivian. 2000. Smith after Sen. Review of Political Economy 12 (1): 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Sen after Putnam. Review of Political Economy 15 (3): 315–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Frederick E., Jr. 1992. The Changing Role of Marketing in the Corporation. The Journal of Marketing 56: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Storchevoy, M. (2018). Economics and Ethics after the 1950s. In: Business Ethics as a Science. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68861-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics