Skip to main content

High-Frequency Stimulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1879 Accesses

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has become an integral treatment option for many patients suffering from chronic, intractable neuropathic pain in the trunk and limbs. New iterations of SCS have been introduced, but the efficacy of such developments so far has been focused on providing more effective paresthesia coverage in the area of pain for appropriate patients. The advent of a new high-frequency SCS system, commercially available as HF10™ therapy, has created a new realm in neuromodulation where paresthesia coverage is no longer relevant. Moreover, HF10 therapy has been shown to be superior to traditional, paresthesia-based, low-frequency SCS in a large, level I randomized controlled study (The SENZA-RCT) [1]. In May of 2015, the evidence from the first of its kind RCT study in neuromodulation, along with strong evidence from the European and Australian experience, led to the approval of the SENZA® system, capable of HF10 SCS therapy, in the United States. HF10 therapy has since become increasingly popular among neuromodulators for the treatment of chronic low back and leg pain, among other indications commonly treated with SCS. The remarkable efficacy of HF10 therapy has helped this technology in finding itself among one of the most popular technologies in SCS in the United States and around the world. This chapter outlines some of the evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of SCS and HF10 therapy and provides a detailed, step-by-step guide for safe and efficient implementation of HF10 therapy SCS for appropriate patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, Gliner BE, Vallejo R, Sitzman BT, et al. Novel 10-kHz high-frequency therapy (HF10 therapy) is superior to traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: the SENZA-RCT randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2015;123:851–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mekhail NA, Mathews M, Nageeb F, Guirguis M, Mekhail MN, Cheng J. Retrospective review of 707 cases of spinal cord stimulation: indications and complications. Pain Pract. 2011;11:148–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sears NC, Machado AG, Nagel SJ, Deogaonkar M, Stanton-Hicks M, Rezai AR, Henderson JM. Long-term outcomes of spinal cord stimulation with paddle leads in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome and failed back surgery syndrome. Neuromodulation. 2011;14:312–8. discussion 318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shimoji K, Higashi H, Kano T, Asai S, Morioka T. Electrical management of intractable pain. Masui. 1971;20:444–7. Japanese

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. North RB, Kidd DH, Olin JC, Sieracki JM. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous and laminectomy electrodes-part I: technical outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:381–9. discussion 389–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hornberger J, Kumar K, Verhulst E, Clark MA, Hernandez J. Rechargeable spinal cord stimulation versus non-rechargeable system for patients with failed back surgery syndrome: a cost-consequences analysis. Clin J Pain. 2008;24:244–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mironer YE, Brown C, Satterthwaite JR, Cohen M, Tonder LM, Grumman S. A new technique of “midline anchoring” in spinal cord stimulation dramatically reduces lead migration. Neuromodulation. 2004;7:32–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holsheimer J, Nuttin B, King GW, Wesselink WA, Gybels JM, de Sutter P. Clinical evaluation of paresthesia steering with a new system for spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery. 1998;42:541–547.; discussion 547–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Kaisy A, Van Buyten J-P, Smet I, Palmisani S, Pang D, Smith T. Sustained effectiveness of 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for patients with chronic, low back pain: 24-month results of a prospective multicenter study. Pain Med. 2014;15:347–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Buyten JP, Al-Kaisy A, Smet I, Palmisani S, Smith T. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back pain patients: results of a prospective multicenter European clinical study. Neuromodulation 2013;16:59–65.; discussion 65–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tiede J, Brown L, Gekht G, Vallejo R, Yearwood T, Morgan D. Novel spinal cord stimulation parameters in patients with predominant back pain. Neuromodulation. 2013;16:370–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nevro Corporation. Patient manual revision B, 11052. Redwood City, CA: Nevro Corporation; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell CM, Jamison RN, Edwards RR. Psychological screening/phenotyping as predictors for spinal cord stimulation. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013;17:307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Shah KJ, Verghese A, Reddy MP, Sarfraz BK, Doddayya H. A study on prescribing pattern of antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis in a tertiary care teaching hospital. World J Pharmacy Pharmaceut Sci. 2016;5:1749–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kasra Amirdelfan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Amirdelfan, K., Silva, J. (2018). High-Frequency Stimulation. In: Diwan, S., Deer, T. (eds) Advanced Procedures for Pain Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68841-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68841-1_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68839-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68841-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics