Skip to main content

The Emergence of the European Defence Research Programme

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Emergence of EU Defense Research Policy

Part of the book series: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management ((ITKM))

Abstract

This chapter examines the emergence of the European Commission’s defense research initiative. It traces the development of a particular narrative on security, innovation, research and economic growth from Servan-Schreiber’s 1960s fears about the transatlantic security technology gap and argues that this narrative became deeply embedded in successive research programs most notably ESPRIT from the 1980s and the security research agenda that began in the 7th Framework Programme, which in turn have shaped the defense research program. The chapter then looks at the claims made by the proponents of defense research funding finding there are three interlocked claims: a technology gap or strategic autonomy claim, an economic and technological benefits claim and a security imperative argument. The chapter goes on to argue that not all these factors can be satisfied in this defense research program and that difficult trade-offs will need to be made. It concludes by asserting that these decisions have to be made with a realistic assessment of the state of the EDTIB, otherwise, the chapter will argue that this risks creating perverse incentives for member states in defense industrial policy and thus may not aid the development of the CSDP in the way it is intended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It should be pointed out that the statistics given in the European Commission quotation are from the main industry lobby group ASD rather than independent data.

  2. 2.

    A good example of this problem was the decision to procure the Eurofighter, which was designed to counter Soviet MiG fighter jets in a presumed Cold War European battlefield in the 1980s but which came into operational service in 2003.

  3. 3.

    It is also important to point out that the claims made for the USA by the various EU reports are considered unproven by some American economists, who point out that no counterfactual model exists to prove whether defense research was uniquely technologically important or if the USA had chosen to fund another sector’s R&D so generously whether it might have had the same effects (Mowery 2012).

Bibliography

  • Bailes A (2008) The EU and a ‘Better World’: what Role for the European Security and Defence Policy? Int Aff 84(1):115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besch S (2017) #AskCER: Is the new European defence fund a game-changer for EU defence? Centre for European Reform, 7 June 2017. http://www.cer.org.uk/askcer-new-european-defence-fund-game-changer-eu-defence

  • Bigo D, Jeandesboz J. (2010) The EU and the European security industry questioning the ‘public-private dialogue’. INEX Policy Brief no. 5, February 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Citi M (2014) Revisiting creeping competences in the EU: the case of security R&D policy. J Eur Integr 36(2):135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creasey P (1988) The options and prospects for defence procurement collaboration. In: Creasey P, May S (eds) The European armaments market and procurement cooperation. Macmillan Press, Basingstoke, pp 165–192

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Edler J, James A (2015) Understanding the emergence of new science and technology policies: policy entrepreneurship, agenda setting and the development of the European framework programme. Res Policy 44(6):1252–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edquist C (1997) Introduction. In: Edquist C (ed) Systems of Innovation: technologies, Institutions and Organizations. Pinter, London, pp 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • EUISS (2016) Report of the Group of Personalities on the Preparatory Action for CSDP Related Research – European Defence Research; The Case for an EU-Funded Defence R&T Programme. http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/GoP_report.pdf

  • European Commission (2016) Defence Action Plan. COM(2016) 950 final, Brussels, 30 November 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2017) Launching the Defence Fund. COM(2017) 295 final, Brussels, 7 June 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • European Network Against the Arms Trade (2016) Why the EU should not subsidy military research. ENAAT Position Paper on the proposal of Preparatory action on Defence research, August 2016, Brussels. http://www.enaat.org/news/PPResearch.pdf

  • Fiott D, Bellais R (2016) A ‘Game Changer’? The EU’s Preparatory Action on Defence Research. ARES Group Policy Paper. http://www.iris-france.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ARES-Group-Policy-Paper-Fiott-and-Bellais-04-16-OK.pdf

  • Hayes B (2010) Full spectrum dominance’ as European Union security policy: on the trail of the ‘NeoConOpticon’. In: Haggerty K, Samaras M (eds) Surveillance and democracy. Routledge, London, pp 148–170

    Google Scholar 

  • James A (2006) The transatlantic defence R&D gap: causes, consequences and controversies. Def Peace Econ 17(3):223–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen T (2002) Technology and market orientation in company participation in the EU framework programme. Res Policy 31(3):437–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manners I (2006) Normative power Europe reconsidered: beyond the crossroads. J Eur Publ Policy 13(2):182–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews R (1992) European armaments collaboration: policy, problems and prospects. Harwood Academic Press, Chur

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro F, Thoma K (2016) The Future of EU Defence Research. European Parliament Report. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/535003/EXPO_STU(2016)535003_EN.pdf

  • Mawdsley J (2004) The Commission moves into Defence Research. Eur Secur Rev 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley J (2011) Towards a merger of the European defence and security markets? In: Bailes A, dePauw S (eds) The EU defence market: balancing effectiveness with responsibility. Flemish Peace Institute, Brussels, pp 11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley J (2013) A European agenda for security technology: from innovation policy to export controls. Brussels, Flemish Peace Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery D (2009) National security and national innovation systems. J Technol Transfer 34(5):455–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery D (2012) Defense-related R&D as a model for “Grand Challenges” technology policies. Res Policy 41(10):1703–1715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson R (ed) (1993) National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Oikonomou I (2015) Brothers in arms? The European arms industry and the making of the EDA. In: Oikonomou I, Karampekios N (eds) The European Defence Agency: arming Europe. Routledge, London, pp 43–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt K (1998) The inevitable limits of EU R&D funding. Res Policy 27(6):559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli C (2000) Policy transfer in the European Union: institutional isomorphism as a source of legitimacy. Governance 13(1):25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon J-J (1977) Science policy studies and the development of science policy. In: Spiegel-Rosing I, de Solla Price D (eds) Science, Technology and Society. Sage, London, pp 43–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Santangelo G (1997) The IT revolution and Europe: The European lag and reaction. An analysis of ESPRIT. Jean Monnet working Paper, No. 09/97, University of Catania, July 1997. http://aei.pitt.edu/390/1/jmwp09.htm

  • Servan-Schreiber J-J (1967) Le défi américain. Denoël, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Solana J, Blockmans S (2016) EU defence plan is ‘no game-changer’. EU-Observer, 16 December 2016. https://euobserver.com/opinion/136315

  • Teffer P (2017) EU environment and science money moved to military fund. EUObserver, 9 June 2017. https://euobserver.com/institutional/138174

  • Zandee D (2016) New kid on the block: The European Commission and European Defence. Clingendael Policy Brief, December 2016 https://www.clingendael.nl/sites/default/files/PB_New%20kid%20on%20the%20block.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jocelyn Mawdsley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mawdsley, J. (2018). The Emergence of the European Defence Research Programme. In: Karampekios, N., Oikonomou, I., Carayannis, E. (eds) The Emergence of EU Defense Research Policy. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68807-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics