Estimating Sequence Similarity from Contig Sets

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10584)

Abstract

A key task in computational biology is to determine mutual similarity of two genomic sequences. Current bio-technologies are usually not able to determine the full sequential content of a genome from biological material, and rather produce a set of large substrings (contigs) whose order and relative mutual positions within the genome are unknown. Here we design a function estimating the sequential similarity (in terms of the inverse Levenshtein distance) of two genomes, given their respective contig-sets. Our approach consists of two steps, based respectively on an adaptation of the tractable Smith-Waterman local alignment algorithm, and a problem reduction to the weighted interval scheduling problem soluble efficiently with dynamic programming. In hierarchical-clustering experiments with Influenza and Hepatitis genomes, our approach outperforms the standard baseline where only the longest contigs are compared. For high-coverage settings, it also outperforms estimates produced by the recent method [8] that avoids contig construction completely.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Technical University in Prague, grant No. SGS17/189/OHK3/3T/13. Access to computing and storage facilities owned by parties and projects contributing to the National Grid Infrastructure MetaCentrum, provided under the programme “Projects of Large Research, Development, and Innovations Infrastructures” (CESNET LM2015042), is greatly appreciated.

References

  1. 1.
    Fowlkes, E.B., Mallows, C.L.: A method for comparing two hierarchical clusterings. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 78(383), 553–569 (1983)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hernandez, D., et al.: De novo bacterial genome sequencing: millions of very short reads assembled on a desktop computer. Genome Res. 18(5), 802–809 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang, W., Li, L., Myers, J.R., Marth, G.T.: ART: a next-generation sequencing read simulator. Bioinformatics 28(4), 593–594 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kleinberg, J., Tardos, E.: Algorithm Design. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levenshtein, V.I.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 10(8) (1966)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marzal, A., Vidal, E.: Computation of normalized edit distance and applications. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 15(9), 926–932 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nurk, S., Bankevich, A., Antipov, D., Gurevich, A., Korobeynikov, A., Lapidus, A., Prjibelsky, A., Pyshkin, A., Sirotkin, A., Sirotkin, Y., Stepanauskas, R., McLean, J., Lasken, R., Clingenpeel, S.R., Woyke, T., Tesler, G., Alekseyev, M.A., Pevzner, P.A.: Assembling genomes and mini-metagenomes from highly chimeric reads. In: Deng, M., Jiang, R., Sun, F., Zhang, X. (eds.) RECOMB 2013. LNCS, vol. 7821, pp. 158–170. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37195-0_13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ryšavý, P., Železný, F.: Estimating sequence similarity from read sets for clustering sequencing data. In: Boström, H., Knobbe, A., Soares, C., Papapetrou, P. (eds.) IDA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9897, pp. 204–214. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46349-0_18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ryšavý, P., Železný, F.: Estimating Sequence Similarity from Read Sets for Clustering Next-Generation Sequencing Data (preprint, 2017), http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.06125
  10. 10.
    Saitou, N., Nei, M.: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4(4), 406–425 (1987)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simpson, J.T., et al.: ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res. 9(6), 1117–1123 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith, T.F., Waterman, M.S.: Identification of common molecular subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 147(1), 195–197 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Warren, R.L., et al.: Assembling millions of short DNA sequences using SSAKE. Bioinformatics 23(4), 500–501 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zerbino, D.R., Birney, E.: Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18(5), 821–829 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Electrical EngineeringCzech Technical University in PraguePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations