The Actors of History: Narrative Network Analysis Reveals the Institutions of Power in British Society Between 1800-1950

  • Thomas Lansdall-Welfare
  • Saatviga Sudhahar
  • James Thompson
  • Nello Cristianini
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10584)


In this study we analyze a corpus of 35.9 million articles from local British newspapers published between 1800 and 1950, investigating the changing role played by key actors in public life. This involves the role of institutions (such as the Church or Parliament) and individual actors (such as the Monarch). The analysis is performed by transforming the corpus into a narrative network, whose nodes are actors, whose links are actions, and whose communities represent tightly interacting parts of society. We observe how the relative importance of these communities evolves over time, as well as the centrality of various actors. All this provides an automated way to analyze how different actors and institutions shaped public discourse over a time span of 150 years. We discover the role of the Church, Monarchy, Local Government, and the peculiarities of the separation of powers in the United Kingdom. The combination of AI algorithms with tools from the computational social sciences and data-science, is a promising way to address the many open questions of Digital Humanities.


Big data Network analysis Digital humanities Narrative analysis Natural language processing 



Thomas Lansdall-Welfare, Saatviga Sudhahar and Nello Cristianini are supported by the ERC Advanced Grant “ThinkBig” awarded to NC. The authors would like to thank FindMyPast for making the original corpus available for study, as well as Dr. Gaetano Dato for his helpful comments.


  1. 1.
    Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: SentiWordNet 3.0: an enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: LREC, vol. 10, pp. 2200–2204 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bagehot, W.: The English Constitution, vol. 3. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, London (1900)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M.: Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theor. Exp. 2008(10), P10008 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bontcheva, K., imitrov, M., Maynard, D., Tablan, V., Cunningham, H.: Shallow methods for named entity coreference resolution. In: Chaınes de références et résolveurs danaphores, Workshop TALN (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bradley, A.W., Ewing, K.D.: Constitutional and Administrative Law, vol. 1. Pearson Education, London (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, C.G.: The Death of Christian Britain: Understanding Secularisation, 1800-2000. Routledge, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cannadine, D.: The context, performance and meaning of ritual: the british monarchy and the invention of tradition, c. 1820-1977. In: The Invention of Tradition, pp. 101–164. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Craig, D.M.: The crowned republic? monarchy and anti-monarchy in britain, 1760-1901. Hist. J. 46(01), 167–185 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fairclough, N.: Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Routledge, London (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Franzosi, R.: Narrative as data: linguistic and statistical tools for the quantitative study of historical events. Int. Rev. Soc. Hist. 43(S6), 81–104 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Franzosi, R.: Quantitative Narrative Analysis, vol. 162. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freeman, L.C.: A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40, 35–41 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gooding, P.: Mass digitization and the garbage dump: the conflicting needs of quantitative and qualitative methods. Literary Linguist. Comput. 28(3), 425–431 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hand, D.J.: Intelligent data analysis: issues and opportunities. In: Liu, X., Cohen, P., Berthold, M. (eds.) IDA 1997. LNCS, vol. 1280, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). doi: 10.1007/BFb0052825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harris, J.: The Penguin Social History of Britain: Private Lives, Public Spirit: Britain 1870-1914. Penguin, UK (1994)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hobsbawm, E.: The invention of tradition edited by eric hobsbawm and terence ranger (1983)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lansdall-Welfare, T., Sudhahar, S., Thompson, J., Lewis, J., FindMyPast Newspaper Team, Cristianini, N.: Content analysis of 150 years of british periodicals. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, p. 201606380 (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y.K., Aiden, A.P., Veres, A., Gray, M.K., Pickett, J.P., Hoiberg, D., Clancy, D., Norvig, P., Orwant, J., et al.: Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014), 176–182 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moretti, F.: Distant Reading. Verso Books, London (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nicholson, B.: Counting culture; or, how to read victorian newspapers from a distance. J. Victorian Cult. 17(2), 238–246 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nivre, J., Hall, J., Nilsson, J.: MaltParser: a data-driven parser-generator for dependency parsing. In: Proceedings of LREC, vol. 6, pp. 2216–2219 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pechenick, E.A., Danforth, C.M., Dodds, P.S.: Characterizing the google books corpus: strong limits to inferences of socio-cultural and linguistic evolution. PLoS One 10(10), e0137041 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roth, S., Clark, C., Berkel, J.: The fashionable functions reloaded: an updated google Ngram view of trends in functional differentiation (1800-2000) (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Soon, W.M., Ng, H.T., Lim, D.C.Y.: A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. Comput. Linguist. 27(4), 521–544 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sudhahar, S.: Automated analysis of narrative text using network analysis in large corpora. Ph.D. thesis, University of Bristol (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sudhahar, S., De Fazio, G., Franzosi, R., Cristianini, N.: Network analysis of narrative content in large corpora. Nat. Lang. Eng. 21(01), 81–112 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Lansdall-Welfare
    • 1
  • Saatviga Sudhahar
    • 1
  • James Thompson
    • 2
  • Nello Cristianini
    • 1
  1. 1.Intelligent Systems LaboratoryUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Department of HistoryUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations