Abstract
Succession has always been a central issue in ecological theory. Ever since first historical formulations, mosaics of vegetation-types taken to be the result of successional processes were envisaged as the pieces composing the Plant Landscape. Following the seminal ideas of F.E. Clements and A. Tansley, first European vegetation scientists, namely G.E. Du Rietz and R. Tüxen, laid the foundations of a system of describing successional vegetation mosaics as a higher complexity level of the Plant Landscape. Such repetitive mosaic units would correspond to ‘elementary’ successional sequences. These included both metastable seral stages and an ecologically mature stable state: the climax stage. Such a successional unit could then be used, as a reference, to systematize Plant Landscape. Early views on succession, expressed by a linear chronological sequence leading to a single territorial stable climatic climax, have been nowadays greatly challenged. Models encompassing sets of non-equilibrium alternative vegetation states, as a function of environmental disturbance, have been developed throughout. Moreover, phytocoenotical diversity also arises from zonation processes, i.e the spatial differentiation of vegetation mosaics following spatial environmental gradients. We do not consider that subject in this paper. In spite of criticism, continental Europe’s phytosociology schools have been elaborating on contemporary concepts of ‘elementary successional units’ or vegetation series as relevant to Vegetation Science. A widely-followed contemporary formulation of vegetation series is that of S. Rivas-Martínez (An Inst Bot Cavanilles 33:179–188, 1976): for a given biogeographical context, in spatially contiguous units possessing uniform environmental conditions, a single successional sequence develops and includes a sole ecologically mature vegetation type—the climax stage (our paraphrase). The real-world existence of coherent vegetation mosaics as the result of succession in homogeneous habitats, possessing a single ‘climax’ stage, is still challenged by several authors. On the contrary, by testing this very hypothesis by means of a case-study on vegetation mosaics from several types of managed oak forests in central-southern Portugal, we found a verification of S. Rivas-Martínez model. Also, accounting for bibliographic sources of evidence supporting verification of the vegetation series hypothesis, we found that putative falsifications issued mostly from distinct semantic or methodological settings. Thus, we find that the concept is, in spite of this, scientifically sound as a basis for a typological system of Plant Landscape which is relevant for Vegetation Science and useful for Nature Management and Vegetation Mapping.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson MJ et al (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x
Béguin C, Hegg O (1975) Quelques associations d’associations (sigmassociations) sur les anticlinaux jurassiens recouvertes d’une vegetation naturelle potentielle (essai de l’analyse scientifique du paysage). Doc Phytosoc 9–14:9–18
Béguin C, Hegg O (1976) Une sigmassociation remarquable au pied du premier anticlinal jurassin. Doc Phytosoc 15–18:15–24
Biondi E, Casavecchia S, Pesaresi S (2011) Phytosociological synrelevés and vegetation plant mapping: from theory to practice. Plant Biosys 145(2):261–273
Bioret F (2010) Un siècle de phytosociologie sigmatiste en France: du temps des pionniers aux applications moderns. Braun-Blanquetia 46:27–40
Blasi C, Caporti F, R. (2005) Defining and mapping typological models at the landscape scale. Plant Biosyst 139(2):155–163
Bolòs O (1963) Botánica y geografía. Mem Real Acad Cienc Artes Barc 34:443–480
Bolòs O (1984) Plant landscape (phytotopography). In: Kuhbier H, Alcover JA, Guerau T (eds) Biogeography and ecology of the Pityusic Islands. Dr. W. Junk Publisher, The Hague, pp 185–221
Braun-Blanquet J (1951) Pflanzensoziologie, 2nd edn. Springer, Wien, p 631
Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie, 3rd edn. Springer, Wien, p 865
Braun-Blanquet J, Furrer E (1913) Remarques sur l’étude des groupements de plantes. Bull Soc Languedocienne de géographie 1913:20–41
Braun-Blanquet J, Pavillard J (1922) Vocabulaire de sociologie végétale, 1st edn. Roumégous & Déhan, Montpelier, p 16
Campbell B (1978) Similarity coefficients for classifying relevés. Vegetatio 37:101–109
Capelo J (2007) Nemorum Transtaganae Descriptio. Syntaxonomia numérica das comunidades florestais e pré-florestais do Baixo Alentejo. PhD Thesis, Technical University of Lisbon, 529 pp
Carrión JS, Fernández S (2009) The survival of the ‘Natural Potential Vegetation’ concept (or the power of tradition). J Biogeogr 36:2202–2203
Chiaruccii A et al (2010) The concept of potential natural vegetation: an epitaph? J Veg Sci 21:1178–1128
Chytrý M, Tichý L, Holt J, Botta-Dukát Z (2002) Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures. J Veg Science 13:79–90
Clements FE (1916) Plant sucession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institution, Washington DC
Costa JC et al (2012) Vascular plant communities in Portugal (continental, Azores and Madeira). Glob Geobot 2:1–180
Delbosc P, Bioret F, Panaïotis C (2015) Les séries de végétation de la vallée D’Asco (typologie et cartographie au 1 :25.000). Ecol Mediter 41(1):5–87
Dovčak M, Frelich LE, Reich PB (2005) Pathways in old-field sucession to white-pine: seed rain, shade and climate effects. Ecol Monogr 75(3):363–378
Du Rietz GE (1936) Classification and nomenclature of vegetation units 1930–1935. Sven Bot Tidskr 30:580–589
Feoli E, Orlóci L (1979) Analysis of concentration and detection of underlying factors in structured tables. Vegetatio 40:49–54
Géhu J-M (1974) Sur l’emploi de la méthode phytosociologique sigmatiste dans l’analyse, la définition et cartographie des paysages. CR Acad Sci Paris 379:1167–1170
Géhu J-M (1976) Sur les paysages végétaux ou sigmassociations des pariries salées du Nord-Ouest de la France. Doc Phytosociol 15–18:57–62
Géhu J-M (1977) Le concept de sigmassociation et son application a l’étude du paysage vegetal des falaises atlantiques françaises. Vegetatio 34:117–125
Géhu J-M (1979) Pour une approche nouvelle des paysages végétaux: la symphytosociologie. Bull Soc Bot France 126:213–223
Géhu J-M (1986) Des complexes des groupements végétaux à la phytosociologie paysagère contenporaine. Inf Bot Ital 18:53–83
Géhu J-M, Rivas-Martínez S (1980) Notions fondamentales de phytosociologie. Ber Int Symp Int Vereinigung Vegetationsk 1980:5–33
Habeck JR, Much RW (1973) Fire dependent forests in the northern Rocky Mountains. Quat Res 3(3):408–424
Hill MO, Gauch HG (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47–58
Humboldt A (1814–1825) Personal narrative of a journey to the equinoctial regions of the new continent [Trad. Jason Wilson 1995. Penguin Classics], 310 p
Ichter J, Evans D, Richard D (2014) Terrestrial habitat mapping in Europe: an overview. European Environment Comission, 154 p
Jongman RHG, Ter Braak CFJ, Van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 299
Loidi J, Fernández-González F (2012) Potential natural vegetation: reburying or reboring? J Veg Sci 23(3):596–604
Loidi J et al (2010) Understanding properly the ‘potential natural vegetation’ concept. J Biogeogr 37(11):2209–2211
Mucina L et al (2016) Vegetation of Europe: hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities. Appl Veg Sci 19(S1):3–264
Pedrotti F (2013) Plant and vegetation mapping. Springer, Berlin, p 294
Peterson WD, Reich PP (2001) Prescribed fire in oak savanna: fire effects on stand structure and dynamics. Ecol Appl 11(3):913–917
Rivas-Martínez S (1976) Sinfitosociología, una nueva metodología para el estudio del paisage vegetal. An Inst Bot Cavanilles 33:179–188
Rivas-Martínez S (1997) Syntaxonomical synopsis of the potential natural plant communities of North America, I. Itinera Geobot 10:5–148
Rivas-Martínez S (2005) Notions on dynamic-catenal phytosociology as a basis of landscape science. Plant Biosyst 139(2):135–114
Rivas-Martínez S (2014) Biogeography of Spain and Portugal. Preliminary typological synopsis. Int J Geobot Res 4:1–64
Rivas-Martínez S, Sánchez-Mata D, Costa M (1999) North american boreal and western temperate forest vegetation (syntaxonomical synopsis of the potential natural plant communities of North America II). Itinera Geobot 12:5–316
Rivas-Martínez S, Rivas Sáenz S, Penas Merino A (2011) World bioclimatic classification system. Global Geobotany 1:1–634. + 4 maps
Schithüsen J (1968) Allgemeine Vegetationsgeographie. Lerbuch der Allgemeinen Geographie 4, Berlin
Schwabe A (1997) Sigmachorology as a subject of phytosociological research: a review. Phytocoenologia 27(4):463–507
Sequeira M et al. (2011) Checklist da Flora de Portugal (continental, Açores e Madeira). ALFA, The Portuguese Association of Phytosociology, 74 p. https://bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt/bitstream/10198/6971/4/2011%20Checklist%20da%20Flora%20de%20Portugal.pdf. Accessed 23 Jun 2016
Sivim (2016) Sistema de Información de la Vegetación Ibérica y Macaronésica [database]. http://www.sivim.info/sivi/. Accessed 23 Jun 2016
Theurillat JP (1992) L’analyse du paisage végétale en symphytocoenologie: ses niveaux et leurs domaines spatiaux. Bull Ecol 23:83–92
Tichy L, Holt J (2006) JUICE Program for management, analysis and classification of ecological data. Masaryk University, Brno Czech Republic, p 103
Troll C (1968) Landschaftsökologie. Ber Int Symp Int Vereinigung Vegetationsk 1963:1–21
Tüxen R (1973) Vorschlag zur Aufnahme von Gesellschaftkomplexen in potentiell natürlichen Vegetationsgebieten. Acta Bot Acad Sci Hung 19:379–384
Tüxen R, Preising E (1942) Grundbegriffe und Methoden zum studium der Wasser und Sumpfpflanzen-Gesellschaften. Dtsch Wasserw 37:10–69
Vigo J (1998) Some reflections on geobotany and vegetaion mapping. Acta Bot Barc 45:535–556
Weber HE, Moravec J, Theurillat JP (2000) International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature 3rd ed. J Veg Sci 11(5):739–768
Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30:279–338
Wildi O (1989) New numerical solution to traditional phytosociological tabular classification. Vegetatio 81:95–106
Wildi O, Orlóci L (1990) Numerical exploration of community patterns. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, p 124
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
1 Electronic Supplementary Material
Table S1
(XLSX 74 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Capelo, J. (2018). Evidence of a Unique Association Between Single Forest Vegetation-Types and Seral Sequences: Praise for the Concept of ‘Vegetation Series’. In: Greller, A., Fujiwara, K., Pedrotti, F. (eds) Geographical Changes in Vegetation and Plant Functional Types. Geobotany Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68738-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68738-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68737-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68738-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)