Skip to main content

Intellectual Soup: On the Reformulation and Repatriation of Indigenous Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shared Knowledge, Shared Power

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Archaeology ((BRIEFSARCHAE))

Abstract

This paper presents a new conceptual framework for the ownership of cultural and intellectual property that is developed by researchers and Indigenous peoples. We argue that ethnographic research produces a new form of knowledge, the creation of an ‘intellectual soup’ that arises from a reformulation of two intellectual traditions and bodies of knowledge. We conclude that all of the people who played a major role in contributing ingredients, tweaking the recipe or providing facilities or equipment have some rights in that intellectual soup. This paper contributes to discussions by archaeologists, Indigenous communities and other stakeholders who are seeking to develop more equitable and successful resolutions and policies regarding the cultural and intellectual property issues. The conceptual framework should help others to constructively negotiate cultural and intellectual property issues, foster positive relationships and head off adversarial or exploitative situations. Though the case study is that of an Australian Aboriginal group, the issues we raise have international applicability.

Thou art rude, and dost not know the Spanish composition... What is the Recipe? Name the ingredients.

Ben Jonson New Inne iv. ii. sig. E7v, Oxford English Dictionary

The original version of this chapter was revised. An erratum to this chapter can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68652-3_11

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use the term ‘Aboriginal’ to refer to Ngadjuri people, or Australian Aboriginal people, as this is the term they use to describe themselves. We use the term ‘Indigenous’ to refer to Indigenous people worldwide, including Australian Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Islanders.

References

  • Adenle, A. (2012). Failure to achieve 2010 biodiversity’s target in developing countries: How can conservation help? Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(10), 2435–2442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., & Christen, K. (2013). ‘Chuck a copyright on it’: Dilemmas of digital return and the possibilities for traditional knowledge licenses and labels. Museum Anthropology Review, 7(1–2), 105–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, T. & Zoe, J. (1997). The Idaa trail: Archaeology and the Dogrib cultural landscape, Northwest Territories, Canada. In G. Nicholas & T. D. Andrews (Eds.), At a crossroads: Archaeology and first peoples in Canada (pp. 160–177). Burnaby: Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asian Human Rights Commission. (2012). Phillipines: Massive displacement of indigenous villagers in Agusan del Norte due to military operation. Available at: http://www.humanrights.asia/news/urgent-appeals/AHRC-UAC-072-2012

  • Atalay, S. (2012). SHARE(ing) the benefits of anthropological research. American Anthropologist, 114(1), 144–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auhl, I. (1986). The story of the ‘Monster Mine’: The Burra Burra mine and its township 1845–1877. Hawthorndene: Investigator Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J., Christen, K., & Turin, M. (2013). Introduction: After the return. Museum Anthropology Review, 7(1–2), 1–21. Special Issue: After the return: Digital repatriation and the circulation of indigenous knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, R. M., & Berndt, C. H. (1988). The world of the first Australians: Aboriginal traditional life, past and present. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibeau, P., Denton, D., & Burroughs, A. (2015). Ce Que La Rivière nous Procurait: Archéologie et historie du reservoir de l’Easmain-1. Mercury Collection Archaeology No. 175. Ottawa: Canadian Museum of History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birt, P., & Copley, V. (2005). Coming back to country. In C. Smith & H. M. Wobst (Eds.), Indigenous archaeologies (pp. 262–279). Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenstein, F., & Pagani, C. (2014). Decolonising national museums of ethnography in Europe: Exposing and reshaping colonial heritage (2000–2012). In I. Chamber, A. de Angelis, C. Ianniciello, M. Orabona, & M. Quadraro (Eds.), The postcolonial museum: The arts of memory and the pressures of history (pp. 39–49). Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D., & Nugent, M. (2004). Mapping attachment. A spatial approach to Aboriginal post-contact heritage. Sydney: Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW).

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, C., & Ferguson, T. J. (2014). The snow-capped mountain and the uranium mine. Zuni heritage and landscape scale in cultural resource management. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 2(4), 234–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copley, W. (1898). Old time memories: When we were boys. In I. Auhl (Ed.), 1983 Burra Burra. Reminiscences of the Burra Mine and Township (pp. 11–32). Adelaide: Investigator Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C., & Galloway, K. (2008). The story of seventeen Tasmanians: The Tasmanian Aboriginal centre and repatriation from the Natural History Museum. Newcastle Law Review, 11(1), 143–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1997). Indigenous people and intellectual property rights. Research paper no 20 1996–97, submitted to Australian Parliament. Available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/RP9697/97rp20

  • Denton, D. (2001). A visit in time: Ancient places, archaeology and stories from the elders of Wemindji. Nemaska. Quebec: Cree Regional Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domañska, L., Grøn, O., & Hardy, K. (2006). Archaeological invisibility and forgotten knowledge. Ethnoarchaeology. Hunter-gatherers. Ephemeral Cultural Aspects. Conference rationale. Available at: www.worldarchaeologicalcongress.org

  • Ferguson, T. J., Dongoske, K., Jenkins, L., Yeatts, M., & Polingyouma, E. (1993). Working together, the roles of archeology and ethnohistory in Hopi Cultural Preservation. CRM 16:27–37. Available at: http://npshistory.com/newsletters/crm/crm-v16-special.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2017.

  • Ferguson, T. J., Koyiyumptewa, S. B., & Hopkins, M. P. (2015). Co-creation of knowledge by the Hopi tribe and archaeologists. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 3(3), 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fforde, C., Hubert, J., & Turnbull, P. (Eds.). (2002). The dead and their possessions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, M., Roberts, A. L., Graham, F., Sansbury, L., & Sansbury, C. (2015). Seeing Narungga (Aboriginal) land from the sea: A case study from Point Pearce/Burgiyana, South Australia. Bulletin of the Australasian Institute for Maritime. Archaeology, 39, 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, S., Bonacchi, C., Moshenka, G. & Richardson, L.-J. (2015). OK computer? Digital community archaeologies in practice. Internet Archaeology 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.11141/ia.40.7. Accessed 12 Apr 2017.

  • Hamilakis, Y. (2007). Archaeology and capitalism: From ethics to politics. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, K. (2010). Archaeological invisibility and forgotten knowledge, BAR. Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. (2004). Shared landscapes. Archaeologies of attachment and the pastoral industry in New South Wales. Sydney: University of NSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedquist, S. L., Koyiyumptewa, S. B., Bernardini, W., Ferguson, T. J., Whiteley, P. M., & Kuwanwisiwma, L. J. (2014). Recording toponyms to document the endangered Hopi language. American Anthropologist, 116(2), 324–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedquist, S. L., Koyiyumptewa, S. B., Whiteley, P. M., Kuwanwisiwma, L. J., Hill, K. C., & Ferguson, T. J. (2015). Mapping Hopi landscape for cultural preservation. International Journal of Applied Geospatial Research, 6(1), 40–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, K., Lyons, N., Loring, S., Arnold, C., Joe, M., Elias, A., & Pokiak, J. (2013). The Inuvialuit living history project: Digital return as the forging of relationships between institutions, people, and data. Museum Anthropology Review, 7(1–2), 44–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerig, K. A., Welch, J. R., Ferguson, T. J., & Soto, G. (2015). Expanding toolkits for heritage perpetuation: The Western Apache ethnography and geographic information science research experience for undergraduates. International Journal of Applied Geospatial Research, 6(1), 60–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtorf, C. (2009). A European perspective on indigenous and immigrant communities. World Archaeology, 41(4), 672–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, D. (1994). Encyclopedia of Aboriginal Australia. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacson, K., & Ford, S. (2005). Looking forward—looking back. Shaping a shared future. In C. Smith & H. M. Wobst (Eds.), Indigenous archaeologies: Decolonising theory and practice (pp. 352–366). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G., & Smith, C. (2005). Living and learning on aboriginal lands: Decolonising archaeology in practice. In C. Smith & H. M. Wobst (Eds.), Indigenous archaeologies: Decolonising theory and practice (pp. 326–349). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janke, T. (1999). Our culture. Our future. Proposals for the recognition of Indigenous cultural and intellectual property. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janke, T. (2009). Guidelines for indigenous ecological knowledge management. Social Science Research Network. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1630080. Accessed 12 Apr 2017.

  • Jenkinson, A., & Loring, S. (2008). “The country is the best museum”: The practice and curation of Innu archaeology and artifacts in Nitassinan (interior northern Quebec-Labrador). Presentation at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco, California, 21 November 2008. Available at: https://si.academia.edu/StephenLoring. Accessed 12 Apr 2017.

  • Kehoe, A. B. (1989). Contextualizing archaeology. In A. Christenson (Ed.), Tracing archaeology’s past (pp. 97–106). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuper, A. (2003). The return of the native. Current Anthropology, 44(3), 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loring, S. (2008). The wind blows everything off the ground: New provisions and new directions in archaeological research in the North. In T. Killion (Ed.), Opening archaeology: Repatriation’s impact on contemporary research and practice (pp. 181–194). Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loring, S., & Ashini, D. (2000). Past and future pathways: Innu cultural heritage in the 21st century. In C. Smith & G. Ward (Eds.), Indigenous cultures in an interconnected world (pp. 167–200). Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loring, S., McCaffrey, M. T., Armitage, P., & Ashini, D. (2003). The archaeology and ethnohistory of a drowned land: Innu nation research along the former Michikamats lake shore in Nitassinan (interior Labrador). Archaeology of Eastern North America, 31, 45–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, J. (2009). Fantastic dreaming: The archaeology of an Aboriginal mission. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, N. (2013). Where the wind blows us, practicing critical community archaeology in the Canadian North. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahama, A. (2012). Enforcing copyright in the book publishing industry in Ghana. Publishing Research Quarterly, 28, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, S. (2009). Collecting cultures: Myth, politics, and collaboration in the 1948 Arnhem land expedition. Walnut Creek: Alta Mira.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, S., Gumurdul, D., & Manakgu, J. (2005). “You write it down and bring it back, that’s what we want” – revisiting the 1948 removal of human remains from Gunbalanya (Oenpelli), Australia. In C. Smith & H. M. Wobst (Eds.), Indigenous archaeologies. Decolonising theory and practice (pp. 110–130). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBryde, I. (Ed.). (1985). Who owns the past? New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClellan, D., & Tanner, K. (2011). Knowledge discovery empowering Australian indigenous communities. Information Technologies & International Development, 7(2), 31. (16).

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, D., Morrison, M., & Schill, C. (2016). ‘My country is like my mother…’: Respect, care, interaction and closeness as principles for undertaking cultural heritage assessments. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22(6), 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNiven, I., & Russell, L. (2005). Appropriated pasts. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, L. M., & Pels, P. (Eds.). (2005). Embedding ethics: Shifting the boundaries of the anthropological profession. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M., & Shepard, E. (2013). The archaeology of culturally modified trees: Indigenous economic diversification within colonial intercultural settings in Cape York Peninsula, Northeastern Australia. Journal of Field Archaeology, 38(2), 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M., Shepard, E., McNaughton, D., & Allen, K. (2012). New approaches to the archaeological investigation of culturally modified trees: A case study from western Cape York Peninsula. Journal of the Anthropological Society of South Australia, 35, 17–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukurtu. (2012). MOOK-oo-too: The free, mobile and open source platform for managing and sharing digital cultural heritage, built for indigenous communities, archives, libraries and museums www.mukurtu.org/.

  • Nakata, M., & David, B. (2010). Archaeological practice at the cultural interface. In J. Lydon & U. Rizvi (Eds.), Handbook of postcolonial archaeology (pp. 429–444). California: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, G., & Bannister, K. (2004). Copyrighting the past? Emerging intellectual property rights issues in archaeology. Current Anthropology, 45(3), 327–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, G., & Hollowell, J. (2004). Intellectual property rights in archaeology? Anthropology Newsletter, 45(4), 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, G., & Markey, N. (2015). Traditional knowledge, archaeological evidence, and other ways of knowing. In R. Chapman & A. Wylie (Eds.), Material culture as evidence: Best practices and exemplary cases in archaeology (pp. 287–307). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijrain, D. M. (2012). Mapping and auditing indigenous knowledge and its management environment: A comparative study of Kenya and South Africa. Doctoral thesis submitted to University of Zululand, South Africa. Available at: http://uzspace.uzulu.ac.za/handle/10530/1062. Accessed 12 Apr 2017.

  • O’Neal, J. (2015). The right to know: Decolonizing native American archives. Journal of Western Archives 6(1): Article 2. Special Issue Native American Archives. Available at: http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/westernarchives/vol6/iss1/2. Accessed 12 Apr 2017. Oxford English Dictionary 2016. http://www.oed.com/

  • Palmer, A. (2010). Displacement of Indigenous peoples. Available at: http://bellacolombia.wordpress.com/2010/07/19/111/. Accessed 29 Jan 2016.

  • Rimmer, M. (Ed.). (2015). Indigenous intellectual property: A handbook of contemporary research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. L., & Campbell, I. (2012). The Ngaut Ngaut interpretive project: Collaboration and mutually beneficial outcomes. The SAA Archaeological Record, 12(4), 29–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. L., Campbell, I., Franklin, N., & Mannum Aboriginal Community Association. (2014). The use of natural features in the rock art of Ngaut Ngaut (Devon downs), South Australia. Rock Art Research, 32(2), 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. L., Mollenmans, A., Agius, Q., Graham, F., Newchurch, J., Rigney, L.-I., Sansbury, F., Sansbury, L., Turner, P., Wanganeen, G., & Wanganeen, K. (2015). ‘They planned their calendar…they set up ready for what they wanted to feed the tribe’: A first stage analysis of Narungga fish traps on Yorke Peninsula, South Australia. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2015.1096869.

  • Rowan, Y., & Baram, U. (Eds.). (2004). Marketing heritage. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, M., & Börner, K. (2004). Mapping knowledge domains. PNAS, 1(Supp. 1), 5183–5185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silliman, S. W. (2005). Culture Contact or Colonialism? American Antiquity, 70(1), 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2004a). On intellectual property rights and archaeology. Comment on Nicholas and Bannister’s copyrighting the past?: Emerging intellectual property rights issues in archaeology. Current Anthropology, 45(3), 527–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2004b). Country, kin and culture: Survival of an Australian Aboriginal community. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies (2nd ed.). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., & Wobst, H. M. (Eds.). (2005). Indigenous archaeologies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., & Jackson, G. (2008). The ethics of collaboration. Whose culture? Whose intellectual property? Who benefits? In C. Colwell-Chanthaphonh & T. J. Ferguson (Eds.), Collaboration in archaeological practice: Engaging descendent communities (pp. 171–191). Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. R., & Morphy, F. (2007). The social effects of native title: Recognition, translation, coexistence, Research Monograph (Vol. 27). Canberra: Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Willika, L., Manabaru, P., & Jackson, G. (1995). Looking after the land: The Barunga rock art management programme. In I. Davidson, C. Lovell-Jones, & R. Bancroft (Eds.), Archaeologists and Aborigines (pp. 36–37). Armidale: University of New England Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soderland, H., & Lilley, I. (2015). The fusion of law and ethics in cultural heritage management: the 21st century confronts archaeology. Journal of Field Archaeology, Advance Article.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, U. (2010). Anthropology, ethnography and prehistory – A hidden thread in the history of German archaeology. In K. Hardy (Ed.), Archaeological invisibility and forgotten knowledge (pp. 6–22. BAR Int. 2183). Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. (2017). The underlying matrices that frame divergent views in the debate on intellectual property and indigenous knowledge protection. Trans-Humanities Journal, 10(1), 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. (2009). Implications and challenges of repatriating and reburying Ngarrindjeri Old People from the ‘Edinburgh Collection’. Museum International, 61(1–2), 37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Intellectual Property Organisation. (2004). Handbook. http://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/iprm/. Accessed 29 Jan 2016.

  • World Intellectual Property Organisation. (2008). Managing intellectual property in the book publishing business. Creative industries – Booklet No. 1. Available at: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/copyright/868/wipo_pub_868.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2016.

  • Wright, D., May, S., & Tacon, P. (2014). A scientific study of a new cupule site in Jabiluka, Western Arnhem land. Rock Art Research, 31(1), 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The ideas presented in this paper were initially discussed in a forum presentation at the ‘Cultural Heritage and Indigenous Intellectual Property Rights’ symposium, held on Ngadjuri lands in Burra, South Australia, in December, 2006. Since then we have discussed these ideas with numerous people. We thank them for helping us to refine our argument. Claire Smith and Gary Jackson express their thanks to all of the Ngadjuri people they have worked with since 1998, particularly Vincent Branson, Vincent Copley junior, Quentin Aegius and Fred Warrior senior. We are grateful to T.J. Ferguson, Amy Roberts and George Nicholas for commenting on various drafts of this article. Figures 2.1 and 2.3 were drawn by Antoinette Hennessey. We thank Veysel Apaydin for encouraging us to write this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Smith, C., Copley, V., Jackson, G. (2018). Intellectual Soup: On the Reformulation and Repatriation of Indigenous Knowledge. In: Apaydin, V. (eds) Shared Knowledge, Shared Power. SpringerBriefs in Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68652-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68652-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68651-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68652-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics