Advertisement

Asking Questions in Supervision

  • Inger UllebergEmail author
  • Per Jensen
Chapter
Part of the Focused Issues in Family Therapy book series (FIFT)

Abstract

A central element in supervision is asking the supervisee questions. Questions can be asked both by the supervisor and the other participants in the group. Questions used to be considered a tool to collect relevant information, while in newer years questions are also understood as powerful interventions or as invitations. In this chapter, we take a closer look at different questions a supervisor can ask.

First, we will take a look at meta-questions, which invite to a conversation about conversation. Then we will take a closer look at four different kinds of questions which are asked about the issue, the situation or the story being told, and will keep a particular focus on with which motives the questions are asked, and place the questions in four overarching categories: to map out the situation, to influence the supervisee’s understanding, to complicate the supervisee’s understanding, to explore what works and to find solutions.

The sources we get the questions from are firstly from the Canadian family therapist Karl Tomm, the second source is the Norwegian professor Tom Andersen, who developed the reflective ream. The third source is questions developed within a solution-focused approach, where we in particular use Norwegian and Swedish authors, and the fourth source we draw questions from is the narrative tradition in general, and a Danish book about consultancy work in particular.

Keywords

Questions Context Intersubjectivity Linear questions Circular questions Solution-focused questions Strategic questions Reflexive questions Stories Externalizing 

References

  1. Andersen, T. (2005). Reflekterende processer-Samtaler og samtaler om samtalerne (3rd ed.). København: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. A. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process, 27(4), 371–393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1992). The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy. In S. McNamee & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 25–39). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bible, H. (2000). King James version. Richmond, TX: National Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. Braten, S. (1998). Infant learning by altercentric participation: The reverse of egocentric observation in autism. Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny, 105–124.Google Scholar
  7. Caplan, G. (2013). An approach to community mental health (Vol. 3). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Cronen, V. E., Chen, V., & Pearce, W. B. (1988). Coordinated management of meaning: A critical theory. Theories in Intercultural Communication, 66–98.Google Scholar
  9. De Shazer, S. (1988). Clues: Investigating solutions in brief therapy. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  10. Egan, G. (2013). The skilled helper: A problem-management and opportunity-development approach to helping. Brooks/Cole: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  11. Geertz, C. (1994). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, 213–231.Google Scholar
  12. Hornstrup, C., Tomm, K., & Johansen, T. (2008). Interventive interviewing revisited and expanded. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  13. Hornstrup, C., Tomm, K., & Johansen, T. (2009). Kunsten at stille de mest effektfulde spørgsmål i rette tid. s: MacMann Berg, Erhvervspsykologi.Google Scholar
  14. Korman, H. (2002a). Mirakelfrågan och mirakelskalan. Retrieved from http://www.sikt.nu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Mirakelfragan-och-Mirakelskalan.pdf
  15. Korman, J. (2002b). Lösningsfokuserad handledning. In M. Søderquist (Ed.), Möjligheter: Handledning och konsultation i systemteoretiskt perspektiv. Stockholm: Studentlitteratur AB.Google Scholar
  16. Krogh, T. (2009). Hermeneutikk. Om å forstå og fortolke. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.Google Scholar
  17. Langslet, G. J. (1999a). LØFT: løsningsfokusert tilnærming til organisasjonsutvikling, ledelsesutvikling og konfliktløsning. Oslo: Ad notam Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  18. Langslet, G. J. (1999b). LØFT: løsningsfokusert tilnærming til organisasjonsutvikling, ledelsesutvikling og konfliktløsning. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.Google Scholar
  19. Lauritzen, P. (2015). Spørgsmål. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  20. Matusov, E. (2009). Journey into dialogic pedagogy. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. McGee, D., Vento, A. D., & Bavelas, J. B. (2005). An interactional model of questions as therapeutic interventions 1. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(4), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01577.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mehan, H. (1979). “What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory Into Practice, 18(4), 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moen, T. (2016). Positive lærer-elev-relasjoner: En fortelling fra klasserommet. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.Google Scholar
  24. Ongstad, S. (2004). Språk, kommunikasjon og didaktikk: Norsk som flerfaglig og fagdidaktisk resurs. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  25. Pearce, W. B. (1994). Interpersonal communication: Making social worlds. New York: Harper Collins College.Google Scholar
  26. Schibbye, A.-L. L. (2009). Relasjoner: Et dialektisk perspektiv på eksistensiell og psykodynamisk psykoterapi. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  27. Sjøberg, J. (2009). Kan deltakelse i kroppsorienterte og gruppedynamiske oppvarmingsøvelser påvirke intersubjektiv deltakelse i etterfølgende smågruppesamhandling? Master thesis, Oslo University Oslo.Google Scholar
  28. Skjervheim, H. (1957). Deltakar og tilskodar [Participant and observer]. Deltakar og tilskodar og andre essays. Oslo: Tanum-Norli.Google Scholar
  29. Solem, I. H., & Ulleberg, I. (2013). Hva spør lærere om? In H. Christensen & I. Ulleberg (Eds.), Klasseledelse, fag og danning. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.Google Scholar
  30. Tomm, K. (1988). Interventive interviewing: Part III. Intending to ask lineal, circular, strategic, or reflexive questions? Family Process, 27(1), 1–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Tomm, K. (1989). Systemisk intervjumetodik: En utveckling av det terapeutiska samtalet. Stockholm: Mareld.Google Scholar
  32. Ulleberg, I. (2014). Kommunikasjon og veiledning: En innføring i Gregory Batesons kommunikasjonsteori—Med historier fra veiledningspraksis (2nd ed.). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  33. Westmark, T., Nissen, D., Offenberg, L., & Lund-Jacobsen, D. (2012). Konsulent—Men hvordan? Narrativt konsulentarbejde i praksis. København: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Education and International Studies, Department of Primary and Secondary Teacher EducationOslo and Akershus University College of Applied SciencesOsloNorway
  2. 2.Family Therapy Section, Faculty of Social StudiesVID Specialized UniversityOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations