Gayatri Spivak: An “Indian” Reading of Hegel

  • M. A. R. Habib
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter looks at an “Indian” reading of Hegel by the noted postcolonial and feminist critic Gayatri Spivak. Here, as in many of her writings, Spivak rejects any outright opposition between East and West or colonized and colonizer. She argues in fact that there is a kind of complicity between Hegel and the Bhagavad Gitā in that they both suspend history as lived experience in favor of general laws, each with an ideological interest. The Gitā aims to give sanction to the Indian hierarchical caste system, while Hegel suppresses the actual development of Indian history and aesthetics in his attempt to demote it. Nonetheless, according to Spivak, there is no historically available authentic Indian point of view that can somehow reclaim its place in the narrative of world history.

Keywords

Hegel and Spivak Hegel and Bhagavad Gitā “Indian” reading of Hegel 

References

  1. Adorno, Theodore W. 1997. Aesthetic Theory. Trans. Robert Hullot-Kentor, 225–226, 245, 250. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bernasconi, Robert. 2003. With What Must the History of Philosophy Begin? Hegel’s Role in the Debate on the Place of India within the History of Philosophy. In Hegel’s History of Philosophy: New Interpretations, ed. David Duquette, 35–50. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  3. van Buitenen, J.A.B., trans. 1981, The BhagavadGītā in the Mahābhārata I, 40–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chatterjee, Partha. 1990. A Response to Taylor’s ‘Modes of Civil Society’. Public Culture 3 (1): 129–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaudhury, P.J. 1965. Indian Poetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 24 (1): 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerow, Edwin. 1977. Indian Poetics, Vol. V. of A History of Indian Literature, ed. Jan Gonda, 265–268. Wiesbaden: Otoo Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
  7. Hegel, G.W.F. 1970. Über die unter dem Namen Bhagavad-Gītā bekannte Episode des Mahabharata von Wilhelm von Humboldt. In Berliner Schriften 1818–1831 (Werke in zwanzig Bänden. vol. 11, 133. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  8. Herling, Bradley. 2010. Either a Hermeneutical Consciousness or a Critical Consciousness: Renegotiating Theories of the Germany-India Encounter. Comparatist 34: 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herring, Herbert, ed. and trans. 1995. On the Episode of the Mahabharata Known by the Name Bhagavad Gita, by Wilhelm Von Humboldt, 1–151. New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research.Google Scholar
  10. Jameson, Fredric. 1998. Postmodernism and the Consumer Society. In The Cultural Turn: Selected Writings on the Postmodern, 1983–1998, 111. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  11. Marcuse, Herbert. 1978. The Aesthetic Dimension: Toward a Critique of Marxist Aesthetics, ix, xi, 4–5, 38. Boston: Beacon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nehring, Andreas. 2009. ‘Mistaken Readings’—Gayatri Spivak’s Deconstruction of Hegel and the BhagavadGītā. In The Fuzzy Logic of Encounter: New Perspectives on Cultural Contact, ed. Sunne Juterczenka and Gesa Mackenthun, 147–156. Münster: Waxmann Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
  13. Petsche, Jackson. 2012–2013. The Importance of Being Autonomous: Toward a Marxist Defense of Art for Art’s Sake. Mediations 26 (1–2): 143–144.Google Scholar
  14. Rathore, Aakash Singh. 2018. Indian Political Theory, 10–16. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  15. Sarma, Bharadvaja. 2008. Vyasa’s Mahabharatam, 414. Delhi: Bimar Kumar Dhir.Google Scholar
  16. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1999. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present, 37. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. R. Habib
    • 1
  1. 1.Rutgers UniversityCamdenUSA

Personalised recommendations