Skip to main content

Algebraic Understanding of Equalities in Primary Classes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teaching and Learning Algebraic Thinking with 5- to 12-Year-Olds

Part of the book series: ICME-13 Monographs ((ICME13Mo))

Abstract

Learning of mathematics in primary classes should not be reduced to learning algorithms and routines or procedures. It is more important to foster children’s thinking and reasoning of meaningful relations between objects and operations. In addition, from our point of view, the algebraic concepts should be more relevant than the algebraic symbols. In this sense, the conceptual understanding of equalities seems to be an essential basis for a flexible and sophisticated understanding of equations. Hence, discussing and explaining equalities should play a prominent role in the teaching and learning of mathematics from the beginning of primary school. In our design study we develop learning opportunities for primary school children that involve comparing terms and tasks with a view toward the underlying mathematical structures . In this chapter we discuss our theoretical background and some results of our video-based qualitative analysis of learning situations in the area of reasoning about equalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that the raised dot is used here to signify the operation of multiplication.

References

  • Bauersfeld, H., Krummheuer, G., & Voigt, J. (1998). Interactional theory of learning and teaching mathematics and related microethnographical studies. In H. G. Steiner & A. Vermandel (Eds.), Foundations and methodology of the discipline mathematics education (pp. 174–188). Antwerpen: University of Antwerp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., & Knuth, E. (Eds.). (2011). Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, K. P., Levi, L., & Carpenter, T. P. (1999). Children’s understanding of equality: A foundation for algebra. Teaching children mathematics, 6(4), 232–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hefendehl–Hebeker, L. (1998). The practice of teaching mathematics: Experimental conditions of change. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of mathematics classrooms (pp. 104–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(3), 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, C. (2011). Overall commentary on early algebraization. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 579–594). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, E., Stephens, A., McNeil, N., & Alibali, M. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(4), 297–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229–270). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., Stephens, M., & Watson, A. (2009). Appreciating mathematical structure for all. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 10–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. (1986). Kollektive Lernprozesse [Collective learning processes]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. (2002). Some theoretical aspects of systemic learning. Sozialer Sinn, (3), 379–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nührenbörger, M. (2015). Mathematical argumentation processes of children between calculation and conversion. In J. Novotná & H. Moraová (Eds.), Developing mathematical language and reasoning. (Proceedings of SEMT’15, pp. 18–29). Prague: Charles University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nührenbörger, M., & Schwarzkopf, R. (2015). Processes of mathematical reasoning of equations in primary mathematics lessons. In N. Vondrová & K. Krainer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 9) (pp. 316–323). Prague: ERME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nührenbörger, M., Rösken-Winter, B., Ip Fung, Ch., Schwarzkopf, R., & Wittmann, E. Ch. (2016). Design science and its importance in the German mathematics educational discussion (ICME-13 Topical Surveys). Rotterdam: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzkopf, R. (2000). Argumentation processes in mathematics classrooms. In Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Mathematik (GDM) (Eds.), Developments in mathematics education in Germany (pp. 139–151). Potsdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzkopf, R (2003). Begründungen und neues Wissen [Reasons and new knowledge]. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 24 (3/4), 211–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, K., & Ginsburg, H. (2003). Classroom context and children’s interpretations of the equals sign. In A. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. 161–187). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbring, H. (2005). The construction of new mathematical knowledge in classroom interaction. An epistemological perspective. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinweg, A. S. (2013). Algebra in der Grundschule [Algebra in primary school]. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The learning paradox and the learning miracle: Thoughts on primary school mathematics education. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 24(2), 28–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, J. (1994). Negotiation of mathematical meaning and learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2–3), 275-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, H. (1982). Das Gleichheitszeichen im Mathematikunterricht der Primarstufe [The equal sign in primary mathematics classes]. Mathematica Didactica, 5, 185–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann, E. Ch. (1995). Mathematics education as a ‘design science’. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(4), 355–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann, E. Ch. (2001a). Developing mathematics education in a systemic process. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann, E. Ch. (2001b). Drawing on the richness of elementary mathematics in designing substantial learning environments. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 193–197). Utrecht, Netherlands: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-477.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph Schwarzkopf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schwarzkopf, R., Nührenbörger, M., Mayer, C. (2018). Algebraic Understanding of Equalities in Primary Classes. In: Kieran, C. (eds) Teaching and Learning Algebraic Thinking with 5- to 12-Year-Olds. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68351-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68351-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68350-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68351-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics