Abstract
The main aim of the paper is to point out the differences in entrepreneurial environment institutional frameworks between the Visegrad four countries (the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland and Hungary—V4) and Finland. The comparison of institutions affecting entrepreneurship was based on creation and analysis of institutional profiles comprising of four pillars essential to understand the emergence of entrepreneurship—regulative, cognitive, normative and conducive dimensions. Our results suggest that entrepreneurial environment in V4 countries substantially differs from that of Finland. V4 countries lack in development of regulative attributes as well as in conducive dimension crucial for innovative entrepreneurship. Subsequently, different quality of environment is reflected in different quality of business activity, and its allocation between independent entrepreneurship and intrapreneurship.
References
Arenius P, Minniti M (2005) Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 24(3):233–247
Barley SR, Tolbert PS (1997) Institutionalization and structuration: studying the links between action and institution. Organ Stud 18(1):93–117
Baron RA (2007) Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation. Strateg Entrep J 1(1–2):167–182
Baumol WJ (1990) Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive and destructive. J Polit Econ 98(5):893–921
Baumol WJ, Strom RJ (2007) Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Strateg Entrep J 1(3–4):233–237
Bowen HP, De Clercq D (2008) Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort. J Int Bus Stud 39(4):747–767
Bruton GD, Ahlstrom D, Li H (2010) Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where we do need to move in the future? Entrep Theory Pract 34(3):421–440
Busenitz LW, Gómez C, Spencer JW (2000) Country institutional profiles: unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Acad Manag J 43(5):994–1003
Casson M (2003) Entrepreneurship, business culture and the theory of the firm. In: Audretsch DB, Acs ZJ (eds) Handbook of entrepreneurship research. An interdisciplinary survey and introduction. Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, pp 223–246
Dickson P, Weawer K (2008) The role of the institutional environment in determining firm orientations towards entrepreneurial behavior. Int Entrep Manag J 4(4):467–483
Hayek FA (1984) The origins and effects of our morals: a problem for science. In: Leube KR, Nishiyama CH (eds) The essence of Hayek. Stanford University, Hoover Institution Press, California, pp 318–330
Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Sage Publications, Newbury Park
Holienka M (2013) Evaluation of entrepreneurial environment in Slovakia: comparison of selected initiatives. Comenius Manag Rev 7(1):31–45
Holienka M, Pilkova A (2015) Evaluating the entrepreneurial environment: a comparison of selected international initiatives. In: Kapounek S (ed) Enterprise and competitive environment, 18th annual international conference, conference proceedings. Mendel University in Brno, Brno, pp 1028–1038
HuÄŤka M, Kislingerová E, MalĂ˝ M (2011) VĂ˝vojovĂ© tendence velkĂ˝ch podnikĹŻ, Podniky 21. stoletĂ. C.H.Beck, Praha
Kostova T (1997) Country institutional profiles: concept and measurement. Acad Manag Best Pap Proceed 1:180–189
Krueger NF et al (2000) Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. J Bus Ventur 15:411–432
Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strateg Manag J 22(6–7):545–564
Mlčoch L (2005) Institucionálnà ekonomie. Univerzita Karlova, Praha, Karolinum
North DC (1981) Structure and change in economic history. W. W. Norton & Co., New York and London
North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Okruhlica F (2013a) VlastnĂcka správa spoloÄŤnosti: Corporate governance. Wolters Kluwer, Bratislava
Okruhlica F (2013b) Vplyv inštitúcià na konkurencieschopnosť Slovenskej republiky a Českej republiky. In: Šnapka P et al (eds) Rozhodovánà a rozhodovacà procesy v organizaci, Series on Advanced Economic Issues. VŠB – TU Ostrava, Ostrava, pp 147–167
Schwab K (ed) (2013) The global competitiveness report 2013–2014. World Economic Forum, Geneva
Scott WR (1995) Institutions and organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Sobel R (2008) Testing Baumol: institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship. J Bus Ventur 23(6):641–665
Stenholm P, Acs Z, Wuebker R (2013) Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. J Bus Ventur 28:176–193
Stiglitz JE (1989) The economic role of the state. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA
Voigt S (2008) Institucionálnà ekonomie. Alfa Publishing, Praha
Williamson O (1996) The mechanisms of governance. Oxford University Press, New York
World Economic Forum (2015) Leveraging entrepreneurial ambition and innovation: a global perspective on entrepreneurship, competitiveness and development. World Economic Forum, Geneva
Acknowledgements
This work is a part of VEGA grant project nr. 1/0933/14.
This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. APVV-14-0647.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Okruhlica, F., Holienka, M. (2018). Institutions and Entrepreneurial Environment in Visegrad Four Countries and Finland. In: Dudycz, T., Osbert-Pociecha, G., Brycz, B. (eds) Efficiency in Business and Economics. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68285-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68285-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68284-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68285-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)