Skip to main content

Advanced methodologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1378 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Praxis Books ((SPACEE))

Abstract

In this Chapter, we suggest analytical and decision options that have not been applied to studies of lunar structures, but offer potentially powerful frameworks to take into account the broad set of issues that are part of the design process. In particular, we suggest the Dempster-Shafer Theory, and performance-based engineering. The published literature does not show the application of the Dempster-Shafer Theory to lunar habitat design. Performance-based engineering has been suggested as an approach, but is, as yet, in the early stages of research [1, 2].

“Other ways to deal with uncertainties.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. H. Benaroya: Performance-Based Engineering for Lunar Settlements, p.33, Report of the Space Resources Roundtable VII: LEAG Conference on Lunar Exploration, October 25-28, 2005, League City, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Benaroya: Performance-Based Framework for the Design of Lunar Structures, 66th International Astronautical Congress, Jerusalem, Israel, 2015. IAC-15-E5.1.4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.P. Dempster: A generalization of Bayesian inference, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 30, 1968, pp.205-247.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, G. Shafer, Princeton University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L.A. Zadeh: A Simple View of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence and its Implication for the Rule of Combination, AI Magazine, Vol.7, No.2 (1986), pp.85-90.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Limbourg, R. Savić, J. Petersen, and H.-D. Kochs: Fault tree analysis in an early design stage using the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence, Risk, Reliability and Societal Safety, Aven and Vinnem, Editors, 2007, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.A. Cornell, and H. Krawinkler: Progress and Challenges in Seismic Performance Assessment, PEER Center News, Vol.3, No.2, Spring 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K.A. Porter: An Overview of PEER’s Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology, in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, Rotterdam, A. Der Kiureghian, S. Madanat, and J.M. Pestana, Editors, Civil Engineering and Reliability Association, Millpress, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Petrini, M. Ciampoli, and G. Augusti: A probabilistic framework for Performance-Based Wind Engineering, EACWE 5, Florence, Italy, July 19-23, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Ciampoli, F. Petrini, and G. Augusti: Performance-Based Wind Engineering: Towards a general procedure, Structural Safety 33 (2011) pp.367-378.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M Barbato, F. Pertini, V.U. Unnikrishnan, and M. Ciampoli: Performance-Based Hurricane Engineering Framework, Structural Safety 45 (2013) pp.24-35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Benaroya, H. (2018). Advanced methodologies. In: Building Habitats on the Moon. Springer Praxis Books(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68244-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics