Abstract
Earth has an extremely dynamic surface which changes naturally across time. In the last century, however, vegetation cover underwent severe modifications due to human demands for natural resources and food production. These changes are deeply modifying the spatial distribution of native environments, which exist today mostly in small patches embedded in human dominated landscapes. This is even harsher in the tropics, where agricultural expansion is more intense. Ecologically, this means that native species have to cope with a heterogeneous set of new environments in which they did not evolve, bringing difficulties for the movement of foraging individuals. This can impair the encounters needed to establish biological interactions among individuals and different species. In this chapter, we explore how landscape changes can lead to variations in ecological networks structure and its consequences for biological and ecosystem services conservation. Although there is a general lack of complete and extensive studies regarding the effects of landscape changes on tropical ecological networks, there is growing evidence that, given a certain native vegetation cover, landscape heterogeneity may favor bigger and more complex networks across scales or ecological hierarchical levels. The relationship between landscape heterogeneity and the structure of ecological networks is however still an open field with many challenges and opportunities and a huge potential for application for conservation and environmental management.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aizen MA, Sabatino M, Tylianakis JM (2012) Specialization and rarity predict nonrandom loss of interactions from mutualist networks. Science 335:1486–1489. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215320
Bartomeus I, Vilà M, Santamaría L (2008) Contrasting effects of invasive plants in plant-pollinator networks. Oecologia 155:761–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0946-1
Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melián CJ, Olesen JM (2003) The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:9383–9387. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1633576100
Blüthgen N (2010) Why network analysis is often disconnected from community ecology: a critique and an ecologist’s guide. Basic Appl Ecol 11:185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2010.01.001
Blüthgen N, Simons NK, Jung K et al (2016) Land use imperils plant and animal community stability through changes in asynchrony rather than diversity. Nat Commun 7:10697. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10697
Boscolo D, Ferreira PA, Lopes LE (2016) Da Matriz a Matiz - Em Busca de uma Abordagem Funcional para a Ecologia de Paisagens. Filos Hist Biol 11:5–42
Burkle LA, Knight TM (2012) Accumulation with area in plant—pollinator networks. Ecology 93:2329–2335
Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Barnosky AD et al (2015) Accelerated modern human—induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci Adv 1:e1400253. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253
Chittka L, Thomson JD (eds) (2004) Cognitive ecology of pollination animal behavior and floral evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Christian CS (1958) The concept of land units and land systems. In: Wiens JA, Moss MR, Turner MG, Mladenoff DJ (eds) Foundation papers in landscape ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 28–35
Cranmer L, McCollin D, Ollerton J (2012) Landscape structure influences pollinator movements and directly affects plant reproductive success. Oikos 121:562–568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19704.x
Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L et al (2011) Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett 14:101–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.x
Falcão JCF, Dáttilo W, Izzo TJ (2015) Efficiency of different planted forests in recovering biodiversity and ecological interactions in Brazilian Amazon. For Ecol Manag 339:105–111.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.12.007
Falcão JCF, Dáttilo W, Díaz-Castelazo C, Rico-Gray V (2017) Assessing the impacts of tramp and invasive species on the structure and dynamic of ant-plant interaction networks. Biol Conserv 209:517–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.03.023
Ferreira PA, Boscolo D, Viana BF (2013) What do we know about the effects of landscape changes on plant–pollinator interaction networks? Ecol Indic 31:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.025
Ferreira PA, Boscolo D, Carvalheiro LG et al (2015) Responses of bees to habitat loss in fragmented landscapes of Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Landsc Ecol 30:2067–2078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0231-3
Foley JA, Defries R, Asner GP et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772
Fontaine C, Collin CL, Dajoz I (2008) Generalist foraging of pollinators: diet expansion at high density. J Ecol 96:1002–1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01405.x
Forman RTT (1995) Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landsc Ecol 10:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133027
Fort H, Vázquez DP, Lan BL (2016) Abundance and generalisation in mutualistic networks: solving the chicken-and-egg dilemma. Ecol Lett 19:4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12535
Forup ML, Henson KSE, Craze PG, Memmott J (2008) The restoration of ecological interactions: plant-pollinator networks on ancient and restored heathlands. J Appl Ecol 45:742–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01390.x
Grass I, Berens DG, Peter F, Farwig N (2013) Additive effects of exotic plant abundance and land-use intensity on plant-pollinator interactions. Oecologia 173:913–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2688-6
Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R et al (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century Forest cover change. Science 342:850–853. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693
Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Muff S, Memmott J et al (2010) The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and interactions: a quantitative approach incorporating pollinator behaviour. Ecol Lett 13:442–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01437.x
Kotliar NB, Wiens JA (1990) Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59:253. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545542
Lihoreau M, Chittka L, Raine NE, Kudo G (2011) Trade-off between travel distance and prioritization of high-reward sites in traplining bumblebees. Funct Ecol 25:1284–1292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01881.x
Loreau M, Mouquet N, Gonzalez A (2003) Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:12765–12770. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2235465100
Metzger JP (2001) O que é ecologia de paisagens? Biota Neotrop 1:1–9
Morales CL, Aizen MA (2002) Does invasion of exotic plants promote invasion of exotic flower visitors? A case study from the temperate forests of the southern Andes. Biol Invasions 4:87–100. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020513012689
Moreira EF, Boscolo D, Viana BF (2015) Spatial heterogeneity regulates plant-pollinator networks across multiple landscape scales. PLoS One 10:e0123628. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123628
Moreira EF, da Silva Santos RL, Silveira MS et al (2017) Influence of landscape structure on Euglossini composition in open vegetation environments. Biota Neotrop 17:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2016-0294
Nielsen A, Totland Ø (2014) Structural properties of mutualistic networks withstand habitat degradation while species functional roles might change. Oikos 123:323–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00644.x
Padrón B, Traveset A, Biedenweg T et al (2009) Impact of alien plant invaders on pollination networks in two archipelagos. PLoS One 4:e6275. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006275
Pardini R, Bueno AA, Gardner TA et al (2010) Beyond the fragmentation threshold hypothesis: regime shifts in biodiversity across fragmented landscapes. PLoS One 5:e13666. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013666
Petanidou T, Kallimanis AS, Tzanopoulos J et al (2008) Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. Ecol Lett 11:564–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01170.x
Pilosof S, Porter MA, Pascual M, Kéfi S (2017) The multilayer nature of ecological networks. Nat Ecol Evol 1:101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0101
Pulliam HR, Dunning JB Jr, Liu J (1992) Population dynamics in complex landscapes: a case study. Ecol Appl 2:165–177
Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC et al (2009) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 142:1141–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021
Slancarova J, Benes J, Kristynek M et al (2014) Does the surrounding landscape heterogeneity affect the butterflies of insular grassland reserves? A contrast between composition and configuration. J Insect Conserv 18:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-013-9607-3
Soares RGS, Ferreira PA, Lopes LE (2017) Can plant-pollinator network metrics indicate environmental quality? Ecol Indic 78:361–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.037
Stein A, Gerstner K, Kreft H (2014) Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecol Lett 17:866–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12277
Turner MG, Gardner RH (2015) Landscape ecology in theory and practice. Springer, New York
Tylianakis JM, Laliberté E, Nielsen A, Bascompte J (2010) Conservation of species interaction networks. Biol Conserv 143:2270–2279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.12.004
Valiente-Banuet A, Aizen MA, Alcántara JM et al (2014) Beyond species loss: the extinction of ecological interactions in a changing world. Funct Ecol 29:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12356
Vázquez DP, Chacoff NP, Cagnolo L (2009) Evaluating multiple determinants of the structure of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Ecology 90:2039–2046. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1837.1
Veech JA, Crist TO (2007) Habitat and climate heterogeneity maintain beta-diversity of birds among landscapes within ecoregions. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:650–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00315.x
Viana BF, Boscolo D, Neto EEM et al (2012) How well do we understand landscape effects on pollinators and pollination services? J Pollinat Ecol 7:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3721
Vilà M, Bartomeus I, Dietzsch AC et al (2009) Invasive plant integration into native plant-pollinator networks across Europe. Proc Biol Sci 276:3887–3893. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1076
Acknowledgements
We thank Rafaela Lorena da Silva Santos for all the support in challenging times and the help with the references and spelling check.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moreira, E.F., Ferreira, P.A., Lopes, L.E., Soares, R.G.S., Boscolo, D. (2018). Ecological Networks in Changing Tropics. In: Dáttilo, W., Rico-Gray, V. (eds) Ecological Networks in the Tropics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68228-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68228-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68227-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68228-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)