QoS-Aware Tactical Power Control for 5G Networks

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10542)

Abstract

Small-Cells are deployed in order to enhance the network performance by bringing the network closer to the user. However, as the number of low power nodes grows increasingly, the overall energy consumption of the Small-Cells base stations cannot be ignored. A relevant amount of energy could be saved through several techniques, especially power control mechanisms. In this paper, we are concerned with energy-aware self-organizing networks that guarantee a satisfactory performance. We consider satisfaction equilibria, mainly the efficient satisfaction equilibrium (ESE), to ensure a target quality of service (QoS) and save energy. First, we identify conditions of existence and uniqueness of ESE under a stationary channel assumption. We fully characterize the ESE and prove that, whenever it exists, it is a solution of a linear system. Moreover, we define satisfactory Pareto optimality and show that, at the ESE, no player can increase its QoS without degrading the overall performance. Finally, in order to reach the ESE and the maximum network capacity, we propose a fully distributed scheme based on the Banach-Picard algorithm and show, through simulation results, its qualitative properties.

References

  1. 1.
    Andrews, J.G.: Seven ways that HetNets are a cellular paradigm shift. IEEE Commun. Mag. 51(3), 136–144 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andrews, J.G., Buzzi, S., Choi, W., Hanly, S.V., Lozano, A., Soong, A.C., Zhang, J.C.: What will 5G be? IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 32(6), 1065–1082 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashraf, I., Ho, L.T.W., Claussen, H.: Improving energy efficiency of femtocell base stations via user activity detection. In: Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Sydney, Australia, 18–21 April 2010Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cisco: Visual networking index: global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2015–2020. In: www.cisco.com, February 2016
  5. 5.
    Debreu, G.: Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econom.: J. Econom. Soc. 22(3), 265–290 (1954)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holtkamp, H., Auer, G., Bazzi, S., Haas, H.: Minimizing base station power consumption. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 32(2), 297–306 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jorguseski, L., Pais, A., Gunnarsson, F., Centonza, A., Willcock, C.: Self-organizing networks in 3GPP: standardization and future trends. IEEE Commun. Mag. 52(12), 28–34 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mériaux, F., Perlaza, S., Lasaulce, S., Han, Z., Poor, V.: Achievability of efficient satisfaction equilibria in self-configuring networks. In: Krishnamurthy, V., Zhao, Q., Huang, M., Wen, Y. (eds.) GameNets 2012. LNICSSITE, vol. 105, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-35582-0_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Meshkati, F., Poor, H.V., Schwartz, S.C., Mandayam, N.B.: An energy-efficient approach to power control and receiver design in wireless data networks. IEEE Trans. Commun. 53(11), 1885–1894 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Osseiran, A., Boccardi, F., Braun, V., Kusume, K., Marsch, P., Maternia, M., Queseth, O., Schellmann, M., Schotten, H., Taoka, H., Tullberg, H., Uusitalo, M.A., Timus, B., Fallgren, M.: Scenarios for mobile and wireless communications: the vision of the METIS project. IEEE Commun. Mag. 52(5), 26–35 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perlaza, S., Tembine, H., Lasaulce, S., Debbah, M.: Quality-of-service provisioning in decentralized networks: a satisfaction equilibrium approach. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 6(2), 104–116 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perlaza, S.M., Poor, H., Han, Z.: Learning efficient satisfaction equilibria via trial and error. In: Proceedings of the Forty Sixth Asilomar Conference on Systems and Computers, Signals, Monterey, CA, 4–7 November 2012Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sabir, E., El-Azouzi, R., Kavitha, V., Hayel, Y., Bouyakhlefi, E.H.: Stochastic learning solution for constrained nash equilibrium throughput in non saturated wireless collision channels. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International ICST Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools, Pisa, Italy, 20–22 October 2009Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Samarakoon, S., Bennis, M., Saad, W., Debbah, M., Latva-aho, M.: Ultra dense small cell networks: turning density into energy efficiency. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. PP(99), 1–15 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simon, H.A.: Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol. Rev. 36(2), 129–138 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Solodovnikov, A.S.: Systems of Linear Inequalities. Popular Lectures in Mathematics, University of Chicago Press (1980)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tan, C.W., Chiang, M., Srikant, R.: Fast algorithms and performance bounds for sum rate maximization in wireless networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 21(3), 706–719 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tembine, H.: Distributed Strategic Learning for Wireless Engineers. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hajar El Hammouti
    • 1
  • Essaid Sabir
    • 2
  • Hamidou Tembine
    • 3
  1. 1.STRS LabINPTRabatMorocco
  2. 2.NEST Research Group, ENSEMHassan II University CasablancaCasablancaMorocco
  3. 3.Learning and Game Theory LabNew York University Abu DhabiAbu DhabiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations