Skip to main content

Introduction: The EC as a Theater State

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Symbolic Politics of European Integration
  • 324 Accesses

Abstract

Krumrey embeds the European Community (EC) in the context of postwar internationalism and elaborates the book’s central puzzle: the EC, in spite of a multitude of competing European organizations such as the OEEC and the Council of Europe, was credited with the cause of European unity and the normative appeal it bestowed. Thus, he argues, it transcended its otherwise limited, technical nature.

Krumrey argues that mainstream accounts of European integration are often underpinned by implicit realist assumptions and fail to fully explain the EC’s normative appeal. His study of the EC’s symbolic representations helps fill this gap. Krumrey introduces key concepts by the ethnographer Clifford Geertz, especially his image of the “theater state,” which he applies to the book’s three case studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Reader’s Digest, “Mr. Europe,” Andre Visson, Apr. 1953, 44 (condensed from the April 1953 issue of the Rotarian).

  2. 2.

    Address by Jean Monnet before the Overseas Writers Club on 5 June 1953, Fondation Jean Monnet pour l’Europe (FJME) AMH 47/7.

  3. 3.

    Le Monde , “L’Europe et les mots,” Pierre Chatenet, 25 Jan 1967. All translations in this book, unless otherwise indicated, are mine.

  4. 4.

    Patel , “Provincializing the European Communities,” 667.

  5. 5.

    Times, “Tug-of-war between Paris and Brussels,” 18 Apr. 1972.

  6. 6.

    Milward , European Rescue; Becker and Knipping, Power in Europe?; Di Nolfo, Power in Europe?

  7. 7.

    Judt, Postwar; Mazower, Dark Continent.

  8. 8.

    Le Monde , “M Wilson a fort à faire pour convaincre le général de Gaulle de la sincérité de sa conversion à l’Europe,” 25 Jan. 1967.

  9. 9.

    Iriye , Global Community, 37.

  10. 10.

    Herbst, “Die zeitgenössische Integrationstheorie.”

  11. 11.

    Patel , “Provincializing the European Communities,” 653–54.

  12. 12.

    Aron, Century of Total War, 311.

  13. 13.

    Chalmers and Tomkins, European Union Public Law, 52.

  14. 14.

    Thiemeyer and Tölle, “Supranationalität.”

  15. 15.

    Hallstein, “Speech at the Institut für Weltwirtschaft,” 82; For an overview of the legal literature, De Witte, “International Legal Experiment.”

  16. 16.

    Judt, Postwar, 159.

  17. 17.

    Geertz , Negara, 121.

  18. 18.

    For a superb example, see Ludlow, European Community.

  19. 19.

    Vauchez, Brokering Europe; Davies and Rasmussen, “New History of European Law.”

  20. 20.

    Geertz , Negara, 123.

  21. 21.

    Kaiser, “From State to Society?”; Ludlow, “Widening.”

  22. 22.

    Kaiser, Wolfram, Leucht, and Rasmussen, “Origins of a European Polity.”

  23. 23.

    Ludlow , European Integration and the Cold War ; Conway and Patel , Europeanization in the Twentieth Century; Garavini, After Empires.

  24. 24.

    Shore, Building Europe; Malmborg and Stråth, Meaning of Europe.

  25. 25.

    Partly an exception, Calligaro, Negotiating Europe.

  26. 26.

    Becker-Döring , Die Außenbeziehungen; Hein, Capital of Europe; Rittberger, Building Europe’s Parliament.

  27. 27.

    Keohane and Hoffmann, “Institutional Change in Europe in the 1980s,” 8.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Krumrey, J. (2018). Introduction: The EC as a Theater State. In: The Symbolic Politics of European Integration . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68133-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics