Using Formal Narratives in Digital Libraries

  • Carlo Meghini
  • Valentina Bartalesi
  • Daniele Metilli
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 733)


Currently, Digital Libraries (DLs) provide simple search functionalities to respond to the user’s queries, which return a ranked list of the resources included in the DLs. No semantic relation among the returned objects is usually reported that could help the user to obtain a more complete knowledge on the subject of the search. The introduction of the Semantic Web and in particular of the Linked Open Data has the potential of improving the search functionalities of DLs. In this context, the long-term aim of our study has been to introduce the narrative as new first-class search functionality of DLs. We intend narratives as semantic networks of events that are linked to the objects of the DLs and are endowed with a set of semantic relations that connect an event to another. In this paper, we report an overview of the main ontologies for representing events and of the tools developed in the Semantic Web field to visualize events and narratives. This overview is needed for achieving the first goal of our research, that is the development of an ontology for representing narratives and, on the top of this ontology, a tool to construct and visualize narratives using the digital objects included in DLs.


Digital libraries Narratives Ontologies Digital humanities Semantic web 


  1. 1.
    Agosti, M., Manfioletti, M., Orio, N., Ponchia, C.: Enhancing end user access to cultural heritage systems: tailored narratives and human-centered computing. In: Petrosino, A., Maddalena, L., Pala, P. (eds.) ICIAP 2013. LNCS, vol. 8158, pp. 278–287. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-41190-8_30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aliaga, D.G., Bertino, E., Valtolina, S.: DECHO–framework for the digital exploration of cultural heritage objects. J. Comput. Cult. Heritage (JOCCH) 3(3), 12 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ang, K., Yu, S., Ong, E.: Theme-based cause-effect planning for multiple-scene story generation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Creativity, Mexico City, Mexico, pp. 48–53 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Astrova, I., Koschel, A., Lukanowski, J., Martinez, J.L.M., Procenko, V., Schaaf, M.: Ontologies for complex event processing. Int. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. Eng. 8(5), 556–566 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O., et al.: The semantic web. Sci. Am. 284(5), 28–37 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Concordia, C., Gradmann, S., Siebinga, S.: Not just another portal, not just another digital library: a portrait of europeana as an application program interface. IFLA J. 36(1), 61–69 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cua, J., Ong, E., Manurung, R., Pease, A.: Representing story plans in sumo. In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Second Workshop on Computational Approaches to Linguistic Creativity, pp. 40–48. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Damiano, R., Lieto, A.: Ontological representations of narratives: a case study on stories and actions. In: OASIcs-OpenAccess Series in Informatics, vol. 32. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Damiano, R., Lieto, A., Lombardo, V.: Ontology-based visualisation of cultural heritage. In: 2014 Eighth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS), pp. 558–563. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Damiano, R., Lombardo, V., Lieto, A.: Visual metaphors for semantic cultural heritage. In: 2015 7th International Conference on Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment (INTETAIN), pp. 100–109. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Boer, V., Oomen, J., Inel, O., Aroyo, L., Van Staveren, E., Helmich, W., De Beurs, D.: Dive into the event-based browsing of linked historical media. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 35, 152–158 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Melo, G., Suchanek, F., Pease, A.: Integrating YAGO into the suggested upper merged ontology. In: 2008 20th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 190–193. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Doerr, M.: The CIDOC conceptual reference module: an ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Mag. 24(3), 75 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doerr, M., Gradmann, S., Hennicke, S., Isaac, A., Meghini, C., van de Sompel, H.: The Europeana Data Model (EDM). In: World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, pp. 10–15 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fernie, K., Griffiths, J., Archer, P., Chandrinos, K., de Polo, A., Stevenson, M., Clough, P., Goodale, P., Hall, M., Agirre, E., et al.: Paths: Personalising access to cultural heritage spaces. In: 2012 18th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM), pp. 469–474. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herman, D.: Basic Elements of Narrative. Wiley, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hunter, J.: Enhancing the semantic interoperability of multimedia through a core ontology. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 13(1), 49–58 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hyvönen, E., Heino, E., Leskinen, P., Ikkala, E., Koho, M., Tamper, M., Tuominen, J., Mäkelä, E.: WarSampo data service and semantic portal for publishing linked open data about the second world war history. In: Sack, H., Blomqvist, E., d’Aquin, M., Ghidini, C., Ponzetto, S.P., Lange, C. (eds.) ESWC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9678, pp. 758–773. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-34129-3_46 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hyvönen, E., Lindquist, T., Törnroos, J., Mäkelä, E.: History on the semantic web as linked data-an event gazetteer and timeline for the world war i. In: Proceedings of CIDOC (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hyvönen, E., Mäkelä, E., Alm, O., Kurki, J., Ruotsalo, T., Takala, J., Puputti, K., Kuittinen, H., Viljanen, K., Tuominen, J., et al.: Culturesampo-finnish cultural heritage collections on the semantic web 2.0. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Digital humanities for Japanese Arts and Cultures (DH-JAC-2009), Ritsumeikan. Citeseer (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hyvönen, E., Takala, J., Alm, O., Ruotsalo, T., Mäkelä, E.: Semantic kalevala – accessing cultural contents through semantically annotated stories. In: Proceedings of the Cultural Heritage on the Semantic Web Workshop at the 6th International SemanticWeb Conference (ISWC 2007), Busan, Korea. Citeseer (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kilfeather, E., McAuley, J., Corns, A., McHugh, O.: An ontological application for archaeological narratives. In: 14th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Proceedings, pp. 110–114. IEEE (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lieto, A., Damiano, R.: Building narrative connections among media objects in cultural heritage repositories. In: Koenitz, H., Sezen, T.I., Ferri, G., Haahr, M., Sezen, D., C̨atak, G. (eds.) ICIDS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8230, pp. 257–260. Springer, Cham (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02756-2_33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lieto, A., Damiano, R., Michielon, V.: Conceptual models for intangible art. A formal modeling proposal. Mimesis J. Scritture della performance 3(2), 70–78 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lombardo, V., Battaglino, C., Pizzo, A., Damiano, R., Lieto, A.: Coupling conceptual modeling and rules for the annotation of dramatic media. Semant. Web 6(5), 503–534 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lombardo, V., Damiano, R.: Semantic annotation of narrative media objects. Multimedia Tools Appl. 59(2), 407–439 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lombardo, V., Damiano, R., Lieto, A., Pizzo, A.: Visualization of character’s intentions in dramatic media. In: 2013 Seventh International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS), pp. 582–587. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lombardo, V., Guardini, N., Olivero, A.: Visualisation of contemporary public art. Mimesis J. Scritture della performance 3(2), 79–89 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lombardo, V., Pizzo, A.: Ontologies for the metadata annotation of stories. In: Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage), vol. 2, pp. 153–160. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A.: Wonderweb deliverable d18, ontology library (final). ICT project 33052 (2003)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mazzoleni, P., Valtolina, S., Franzoni, S., Mussio, P., Bertino, E.: Towards a contextualized access to the cultural heritage world using 360 panoramic images. In: SEKE, pp. 416–419 (2006)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Meister, J.C.: Computing action: a narratological approach, vol. 2. Walter de Gruyter (2003)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mulholland, P., Collins, T.: Using digital narratives to support the collaborative learning and exploration of cultural heritage. In: 13th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Proceedings, pp. 527–531. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mulholland, P., Collins, T., Zdrahal, Z.: Story fountain: intelligent support for story research and exploration. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 62–69. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Niles, I., Pease, A.: Mapping wordnet to the sumo ontology. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Knowledge Engineering Conference, pp. 23–26 (2003)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pease, A., Niles, I., Li, J.: The suggested upper merged ontology: A large ontology for the semantic web and its applications. In: Working Notes of the AAAI-2002 Workshop on Ontologies and the Semantic Web, vol. 28 (2002)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Poli, R., Healy, M., Kameas, A.: Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications. Springer, Cham (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Raimond, Y., Abdallah, S.: The event ontology. Technical report, Citeseer (2007)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Scherp, A., Franz, T., Saathoff, C., Staab, S.: F-a model of events based on the foundational ontology DOLCE+DnS ultralight. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 137–144. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shaw, R., Troncy, R., Hardman, L.: LODE: linking open descriptions of events. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Yu, Y., Ding, Y. (eds.) ASWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5926, pp. 153–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-10871-6_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Suchanek, F.M., Kasneci, G., Weikum, G.: YAGO: a core of semantic knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 697–706. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Van Hage, W.R., Malaisé, V., Segers, R., Hollink, L., Schreiber, G.: Design and use of the Simple Event Model (SEM). Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 9(2), 128–136 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wenjun, W., Yingwei, L., Xinpeng, L., Xiaolin, W., Zhuoqun, X.: Ontological model of event for integration of inter-organization applications. In: Gervasi, O., Gavrilova, M.L., Kumar, V., Laganà, A., Lee, H.P., Mun, Y., Taniar, D., Tan, C.J.K. (eds.) ICCSA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3480, pp. 301–310. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). doi: 10.1007/11424758_32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wolff, A., Mulholland, P., Collins, T.: Storyspace: a story-driven approach for creating museum narratives. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, pp. 89–98. ACM (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlo Meghini
    • 1
  • Valentina Bartalesi
    • 1
  • Daniele Metilli
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell’Informazione “Alessandro Faedo” – CNRPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations