Skip to main content

Risk Cost Accounting and Bottom Price Calculation – A Risk Management Information System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Economics of Grids, Clouds, Systems, and Services (GECON 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCCN,volume 10537))

  • 1065 Accesses

Abstract

Due to legal regulations, most firms have installed risk management systems that monitor existence-threatening risks. Minor risks are usually not in their focus so that these systems are often not adequate for an effective operational risk management as they lack of a consistent quantification, valuation, and handling of risks. In particular for service providers who offer services at different levels, considering risks and their potential costs is crucial for the pricing scheme. Therefore, this paper presents a new kind of a risk management information system that extends the traditional cost accounting by introducing the concept of risk costs. This allows a consistent and uniform valuation and comparison of risks as well as an easy integration into existing enterprise IS. Besides the provision of detailed overviews of the risk situation of cost centers, cost units, business units, business areas etc., different levels of risk adjusted bottom prices for products and services can be calculated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aven, T., Renn, O.: On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. J. Risk Res. 12(1), 1–11 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bainbridge, S.M.: Caremark and enterprise risk management (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bakar, B.A., Rasid, S.Z.A., Rizal, A.M.: Performance measures use, government regulation, risk management and accountability. In: 2014 Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Interdisciplinary Behavior and Social Science (ICIBSoS 2014), Bali, Indonesia. CRC Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bishop, R.C., Heberlein, T.A.: Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased? Am. J. Agric. Econ. 61(5), 926–930 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bitz, H.: Risikomanagement nach KonTraG. Stuttgart (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boyko, V., Rudnichenko, N., Kramskoy, S., Hrechukha, Y., Shibaeva, N.: Concept implementation of decision support software for the risk management of complex technical system. In: Shakhovska, N. (ed.) Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. AISC, vol. 512, pp. 255–269. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45991-2_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Braun, K.W., Tietz, W.M., Harrison, W.T., Bamber, L.S., Horngren, C.T.: Managerial Accounting. Pearson, Boston (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bromiley, P., McShane, M., Nair, A., Rustambekov, E.: Enterprise risk management: Review, critique, and research directions. Long Range Plan. 48(4), 265–276 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bussmann, K.F.: Das betriebswirtschaftlicher Risiko. Meisenheim am Glan (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carter, R.L., Crockford, G.N.: The development and scope of risk management. In: Pountney, B. (ed.) Handbook of Risk Management, Supplement 55, Kingston upon Thames 1999, 1.1-01–1.1-21 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Colletaz, G., Christophe, H., Pérignon, C.: The risk map: A new tool for validating risk models. J. Bank. Finance 37(10), 3843–3854 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Collier, P.M., Berry, A.J., Burke, G.T.: Risk and Management Accounting: Best Practice Guidelines for Enterprise-Wide Internal Control Procedures, vol. 2(11). Elsevier, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper, D.J., Ezzamel, M., Qu, S.: Popularizing a management accounting idea: the case of the balanced scorecard (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dickinson, G.: Enterprise risk management its origins and conceptual foundation. Geneva Pap. Risk Insur. - Issues Pract. 26(3), 360–366 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Dionne, G.: Risk management: history, definition, and critique. Risk Manage. Insur. Rev. 16(2), 147–166 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Fatemi, A., Luft, C.: Corporate risk management: costs and benefits. Glob. Finance J. 13(1), 29–38 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gleißner, W., Romeike, F.: Anforderungen an die Softwareunterstützung für das Risikomanagement. Zeitschrift für Controlling Manage. 2, 154–164 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Horngren, C.T., Bhimani, A., Datar, S.M., Foster, G., Horngren, C.T.: Management and cost accounting. Financial Times/Prentice Hall, Harlow (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Press, Boston (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kaplan, R.S., Atkinson, A.A., Morris, D.J.: Advanced Management Accounting, vol. 3. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lackes, R., Siepermann, M., Springwald, S.: Risk Management information systems as possibility to meet with the global risk situation. In: Enterprise and Competitive Environment, Bučovice 2011, pp. 457–472 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. McNeil, J.A., Frey, R., Embrechts, P.: Quantative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller, K.D.: A framework for integrated risk management in international business. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 23(2), 311–331 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Perramon, J., Rocafort, A., Bagur-Femenias, L., Llach, J.: Learning to create value through the ‘balanced scorecard’ model an empirical study. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excellence 27(9), 1121–1139 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rücker, U.-C.: Finanzierung von Umweltrisiken im Rahmen eines systematischen Risikomanagements. Sternenfels (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schmit, J.T., Roth, K.: Cost effectiveness of risk management practices. J. Risk Insur. 57(3), 455–470 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Selviaridis, K., Norrman, A.: Performance-based contracting in service supply chains: a service provider risk perspective. Supply Chain Manage. Int. J. 19(2), 153–172 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Siepermann, C.: Risk management in logistics with the balanced scorecard. In: Grzybowska, K., Golinska, P. (eds.): Selected Logistics Problems and Solutions, Posen, pp. 243–265 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Unser, M.: Lower partial moments as measures of perceived risk: An experimental study. J. Econ. Psychol. 21(3), 253–280 (2000). doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(00)00004-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Siepermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Siepermann, M. (2017). Risk Cost Accounting and Bottom Price Calculation – A Risk Management Information System. In: Pham, C., Altmann, J., Bañares, J. (eds) Economics of Grids, Clouds, Systems, and Services. GECON 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10537. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68066-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68066-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68065-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68066-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics