Advertisement

A Critical Appraisal on Turkey’s Neoliberal Quest of Urban Renewal in Historic Urban Landscapes

Conference paper
Part of the Springer Natural Hazards book series (SPRINGERNAT)

Abstract

The paper aims at presenting a critical appraisal on Turkey’s quest for urban renewal under the threat of man-made disasters, through a special consideration on historic urban landscapes, and particularly its world heritage sites. It deals with how policies designed to mitigate earthquake risk and provide quality of life in the transformation of historic urban landscapes turn into tools of extensive clearance of spatial, social and cultural fabric with the experiences from Istanbul. The paper hopes that the lessons learned from Istanbul’s experience provide a medium to discuss the severe challenges and their resolving instruments associated with natural revanchist disasters as well as man-made disasters, especially in developing countries and in the sites with outstanding common heritage values such as Kathmandu.

Keywords

Urban renewal Historic urban landscapes Man-made disasters Neoliberal urbanism 

References

  1. Advisory Group on Forced Evictions (2009) AGFE Mission: Advisory Group On Forced Evictions To The Executive Director Of UN-HABITAT, 8–11 June 2009Google Scholar
  2. Bartu-Candan A, Kolluoglu B (2008) Emerging spaces of neoliberalism: A gated town and a public housing project in Istanbul. New Perspectives on Turkey 39:5–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cavusoglu E, Strutz J (2014) We’ll come and demolish your house!: The role of spatial (re)production in the neoliberal hegemonic politics of Turkey. In: Akca I, Bekmen A, Ozden BA (eds) Turkey Reframed: Constituting Neoliberal Hegemony. Pluto Press, London, pp 141–154Google Scholar
  4. Dincer I, Enlil Z, Evren Y, Kozaman-Som Z (2010) Istanbul’un Tarihi ve Dogal Miras Degerleri: Potansiyeller, Riskler ve Koruma Sorunlari [Istanbul’s Historic and Natural Values: Potentials, Risks and Conservation Problems]. Bilgi University, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  5. Eraydin A, Tasan-Kok T (2014) State response to contemporary urban movements in turkey: A critical overview of state entrepreneurialism and authoritarian interventions. Antipode 46(1):110–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gunay Z (2015) Renewal agenda in Istanbul: Urbanisation vs. urbicide. ICONARP Int J Archit Planning 3(1):95–108Google Scholar
  7. Gunay Z (2016) Temporality and limits to hospitality in the ruins of a world heritage (renewal) site: Suleymaniye in Istanbul Historic Peninsula. In: Proceedings of the 52th ISoCaRP Congress on Frontiers of Planning, Durban, September 2016, pp 180–189Google Scholar
  8. Gunay Z, Koramaz TK, Ozuekren AS (2015) From squatter upgrading to large-scale renewal programmes: Housing renewal in Turkey. In: Turkington R, Watson C (eds) Renewing Europe’s Housing. Policy Press, Bristol, pp 215–244Google Scholar
  9. Harvey D (2000) Spaces of hope. Edinburgh University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Isik O, Pinarcioglu M (2001) Nobetlese Yoksulluk: Sultanbeyli Ornegi [Poverty in turn, squatter housing and urban poor: The example of sultanbeyli]. Iletisim, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  11. Keyder C (ed) (2000) Istanbul: Küresel ile Yerel Arasında [Between the Global and the Local]. Metis, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  12. Klein N (2007) The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. Alfred A. Knopf, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuyucu T, Unsal O (2010) Urban transformation as state-led property transfer: an analysis of two cases of urban renewal in Istanbul. Urban Stud 47(7):1479–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lovering J, Turkmen H (2011) Bulldozer neo-liberalism in Istanbul: The state-led construction of property markets, and the displacement of the urban poor. Int Plann Stud 16(1):73–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. NRA (2016) Post-disaster Recovery Framework 2016–2020 by the Government of Nepal National Reconstruction AuthorityGoogle Scholar
  16. Oktem B (2006) Neoliberal küreselleşmenin kentlerde inşası: AKP’nin küresel kent söylemi ve İstanbul’un kentsel dönüşüm projeleri [Construction of neo-liberal globalisation in cities: The global city discourse of AKP and the urban regeneration projects of Istanbul]. Planlama 2:53–63Google Scholar
  17. Sandolhz S (2017) Urban Centres in Asia and Latin America: Heritage and Identities in Changing Urban Landscapes. Springer International, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tekeli I (2009) Kent, Kentli Hakları, Kentleşme ve Kentsel Dönüşüm [City, Citizen Rights, Urbanisation and Urban Transformation], Istanbul: Tarih VakfiGoogle Scholar
  19. Tiwari SR (2015) Material authenticity and conservation traditions in Nepal. In: Weiler K, Gutschow N (eds) Authenticity in Architectural Heritage Conservation: Discourses, Opinions, Experiences in Europe, South and East Asia. Springer International, Cham, pp 169–186Google Scholar
  20. Turkun A (2011) Urban regeneration and hegemonic power relationships. Int Plann Stud 6(1):61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. UN (2016) New Urban Agenda: Quito Declaration on Sustainable Cities and Human Settlements for All. United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development [Habitat III], A/RES/71/256, p 11, Quito, October 2016Google Scholar
  22. UNESCO (2015) Revisiting Kathmandu: Safeguarding Living Heritage. ParisGoogle Scholar
  23. UNESCO/WHC (2008) State of conservation of World Heritage properties. WHC-2008/32COM 7B.Add.2, p 21–25Google Scholar
  24. UNESCO/WHC (2009) State of Conservation (Historic Areas of Istanbul). Decision WHC-09/33COM 7B.124, Sevilla, p 155–156Google Scholar
  25. UNESCO/WHC (2010) State of Conservation (Historic Areas of Istanbul). Decision WHC-10/34COM 7B.102, Brazilia, p 188Google Scholar
  26. UNESCO/WHC (2012) Joint ICOMOS/UNESCO WHC Reactive Monitoring Report: Historic Areas of Istanbul (Turkey) (C 356), November 2012Google Scholar
  27. Unsal F, Turk SS (2014) Legal and Institutional Context of Urban Planning and Urban Renewal in Turkey: Thinking about Istanbul. In: Erkut G, Shirazi R (eds) Dimensions of Urban Re-development. Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, pp 15–30Google Scholar
  28. Weise K (2015) Conserving continuity. Himal Southasian 28(2):N/AGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Istanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations