Abstract
Total Hip Replacement nowadays represents an established surgical technique that helps patients to restore a proper joint function and relieve them from pain. Research, laboratory results and improvement in the industrial testing of total hip replacement components brought important knowledge in the preclinical validation of prostheses. The preclinical validation of hip joint prostheses is a critical step for further development of new implant designs act to reduce the possibility of catastrophic failures and revision surgery. The objective of a preclinical test is to determine the wear rate and its dependence on the test conditions. In the field of wear analysis computational modelling may have the potential to help product design in minimizing wear. Best practice suggested is to enhance the data collection derived from physical wear testing through numerical modelling.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdel Jaber S et al (2014) In vitro effects on mobile polyethylene insert under highly demanding daily activities: stair climbing. Int Orthop
Abdel Jaber S et al (2015a) In vitro effects on mobile polyethylene insert under highly demanding daily activities: stair climbing. Int Orthop 39(7):1433–1440
Abdel-Jaber S et al (2015b) Wear simulation of total knee prostheses using load and kinematics waveforms from stair climbing. J Biomech 48(14):3830–3836
Abdel-Jaber S et al (2016) A new protocol for wear testing of total knee prostheses from real joint kinematic data: towards a scenario of realistic simulations of daily living activities. J Biomech
Affatato S (2012) Testing of Artificial hip joints. Encycl Tribol
Affatato S et al (2008) Tribology and total hip joint replacement: current concepts in mechanical simulation. Med Eng Phys 30(10):1305–1317
Affatato S et al (2012) In vitro wear performance of standard, crosslinked, and vitamin-E-blended UHMWPE. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A 100(3):554–560
Affatato S, Salvatore J et al (2016a) Does cyclic stress and accelerated ageing influence the wear behavior of highly crosslinked polyethylene? J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 59:418–429
Affatato S, De Mattia JS et al (2016b) Wear performance of neat and vitamin E blended highly cross-linked PE under severe conditions: the combined effect of accelerated ageing and third body particles during wear test. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 64:240–252
Affatato S, Freccero N, Taddei P (2016c) The biomaterials challenge: a comparison of polyethylene wear using a hip joint simulator. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 53:40–48
Arunajadai SG et al (2004) Failure mode identification through clustering analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int 511–526
Argenson J-NA et al (2007) Anatomy of the dysplastic hip and consequences for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 465:40–45
Baleani M, Cristofolini L, Viceconti M (1999) Endurance testing of hip prostheses: a comparison between the load fixed in ISO 7206 standard and the physiological loads. Clin Biomech 14:339–345
Battaglia S et al (2014) A new protocol from real joint motion data for wear simulation in total knee arthroplasty: stair climbing. Med Eng Phys 36:1605–1610
Canale ST, Beaty JH (2007) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, 11th edn. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia
Cristofolini L et al (2010) Mechanical testing of bones: the positive synergy of finite-element models and in vitro experiments. Philos Trans Series A Math Phys Eng Sci 368:2725–2763
Delp SL, Komattu AV, Wixson RL (1994) Superior displacement of the hip in total joint replacement: effects of prosthetic neck length, neck-stem angle, and anteversion angle on the moment-generating capacity of the muscles. J Orthop Res 12(6):860–870
Devine J (2011) Developing PEEK polymer as a bearing material for implants. In Medical device and diagnostic industry
Dowson D (1998) History of tribology, 2nd edn. p 2017
Eingartner C (2007) Current trends in total hip arthroplasty. Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja 1(16):8–14
Gomez PF, Morcuende JA (2005) Early attempts at hip arthroplasty–1700s to 1950s. Lowa Orthop J 25:25–29
Gray H, Williams PL, Bannister LH (1995) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of medicine and surgery, 38th edn. Churcill Livingstone, New York
Kapandji IA (1998) The physiology of joints. Volume 2: lower Limb, 5th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York
Knight SR, Aujla R, Biswas SP (2011) Total hip arthroplasty—over 100 years of operative history. Orthop Rev 3(e16)
Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370(9597):1508–1519
Martelli S et al (2011) Extensive risk analysis of mechanical failure for an epiphyseal hip prothesis: a combined numerical-experimental approach. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 225:126–140
Mollan RA et al (1984) Failure of the femoral component in the Howse total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 142–147
Noble PC et al (2003) Three-dimensional shape of the dysplastic femur: implications for THR. Clin Orthop Relat Res 27–40
Ploeg HL et al (1999) Fatigue strength testing of hip stems with statistical analysis. Bio-Med Mater Eng 9:243–263
Ploeg HL, Bürgi M, Wyss UP (2009) Hip stem fatigue test prediction. Int J Fatigue 31:894–905
Pramanik S, Argawal AK, Rai KN (2005) Chronology of total hip joint replacement and materials development. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 19(1):15–26
Ratner BD (2004) Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine, 2nd edn. Academic press, Elsevier
Rieker CB (2003) Tribology in total hip arthroplasty—historical development and future trends. Centerpulse Orthopaedics Ltd
Røkkum M et al (1995) Stem fracture with the Exeter prosthesis. 3 of 27 hips followed for 10 years. Acta Orthop Scand 66:435–439
Schlesinger S et al (1979) Terminology for model credibility. SIMULATION 32:103–104
Strickland M, Taylor M (2014) Joint wear simulation. In: Jin Z (ed) Computational modelling of biomechanics and biotribology in the muscoloskeletal system: Biomaterials and tissues, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 39–76
Thompson JC (2002) Netter’s Concise Atlas of Orthopaedic Anatomy, 1st edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia
Traina F et al (2009) Sex diffenrences in hip morphology: is stem modularity effective for total hip replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(6):121–128
Traina F, De Fine M, Affatato S (2012) Anatomy of the hip and suitable prostheses. In: Affatato S. (ed) Wear of orthopaedic implants and artificial joints, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 93–114
Vasavada AN et al (1994) Compensating for changes in muscle length in total hip arthroplasty. Effects on the moment generating capacity of the muscles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 302:121–133
Viceconti M et al (2009) Pre-clinical validation of joint prostheses: a systematic approach. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2(1):120–127
Wroblewski BM (1979) The mechanism of fracture of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement. Int Orthop 3:137–139
Acknowledgements
The author’s whish to thank Luigi Lena (Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute) for his help for drawing these original figures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abdel Jaber, S., Affatato, S. (2018). An Overview of In Vitro Mechanical and Structural Characterization of Hip Prosthesis Components. In: Zivic, F., Affatato, S., Trajanovic, M., Schnabelrauch, M., Grujovic, N., Choy, K. (eds) Biomaterials in Clinical Practice . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68025-5_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68025-5_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68024-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68025-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)