Advertisement

Conclusions and Implications for Industry, Policy and Research

  • Tom Hargreaves
  • Charlie Wilson
Chapter
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

In this chapter we synthesise the main findings from the four empirical chapters and summarise the arguments and themes developed throughout the book. These illustrate the importance of research that integrates across functional, instrumental and socio-technical views of smart homes and their users. These cross-cutting themes have important implications both for the SHT industry and for policymakers, particularly in the energy domain. We conclude this chapter by highlighting key issues for further research on smart homes and their users, and by setting out a range of new research questions.

References

  1. Cook DJ (2012) How smart is your home? Science 335(6076):1579–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Davidoff S, Lee MK, Yiu C, Zimmerman J, Dey AK (2006) Principles of smart home control. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4206:19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Demiris G, Hensel K, Skubic M, Rantz M (2008) Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for ‘smart home’ sensor technologies’. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 24(1):120–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Geelen D, Reinders A, Keyson D (2013) Empowering the end-user in smart grids: recommendations for the design of products and services. Energy Policy 61:151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goulden M (2017) Your smart home is trying to reprogram you. The Conversation (31 May 2017) Online at: https://theconversation.com/your-smart-home-is-trying-to-reprogram-you-78572
  6. Goulden M, Bedwell B, Rennick-Egglestone S, Rodden T, Spence A (2014) Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management. Energy Res Soc Sci 2:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hargreaves T, Nye M, Burgess J (2010) Making energy visible: a qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy 38:6111–6119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Koskela T, Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila K (2005) Evolution towards smart home environments: empirical evaluation of three user interfaces. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 8:234–240Google Scholar
  9. Mennicken S, Vermeulen J, Huang EM (2014) From today’s augmented houses to tomorrow’s smart homes: new directions for home automation research. Paper presented at the UbiComp 2014, Seattle, USA, 13–17 Sept 2014Google Scholar
  10. Nyborg S, Røpke I (2011) Energy impacts of the smart home—conflicting visions. Paper presented at the European Council for an Energy Efficiency Economy (ECEEE) summer study 2011, Hyeres, France. 6–11 June 2011Google Scholar
  11. OECD (2008) OECD information technology outlook. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  12. Pettifor H, Wilson C, Chryssochoidis G (2015) The appeal of the green deal: empirical evidence for the influence of energy efficiency policy on renovating homeowners. Energy Policy 79:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schot J, Kanger L, Verbong G (2016) The roles of users in shaping transitions to new energy systems. Nat Energy 1(16054)Google Scholar
  14. Strengers Y (2013) Smart energy technologies in everyday life: smart utopia?. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Strengers Y, Nicholls L (2017, In Press) Convenience and energy consumption in the smart home of the future: industry visions from Australia and beyond. Energy Res Soc Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.008
  16. Strengers Y, Morley J, Nicholls L, Hazas M (2016) The hidden energy costs of smart homes. The Conversation (12 June 2016) Online at: https://theconversation.com/the-hidden-energy-cost-of-smart-homes-60306
  17. Wilhite H, Diamond R (2017) Do smart homes know what people want and allow them to realize it? Paper presented at the European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ECEEE) summer study 2017. Hyeres, FranceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Science, Society and Sustainability Research Group (3S), School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
  2. 2.Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations