Abstract
This chapter draws on in-depth qualitative data to explore how 10 households domesticated smart home technologies (SHTs) over a nine month period as part of the SHT field trial described in Chap. 1. The analysis is situated within the socio-technical view of smart homes and their users in our analytical framework (Table 2.1). We explore the co-evolution of SHTs and their users, and the forms of work and learning engaged in by householders when they adopt SHTs. We identify three distinct domestication pathways for SHTs which show why it is so important to pay close attention to homes as complex places and settings for the adoption and use of new technologies. In each of these pathways, we explain the negotiations, conflicts and resistances that SHTs generate as they are domesticated, and the multiple and sometimes uneven roles that different householders play in this process. We also demonstrate how the introduction of SHTs into homes can serve to disrupt and re-domesticate other aspects of the domestic environment. Pre-existing domestic technologies must be fitted-in with the newly ‘smart’ home. Three core themes emerge from this new analysis. First, SHTs are both technically and socially disruptive. Second, householders must adopt a range of adaptation strategies to cope with the disruption that SHTs generate and which can limit their use and potential. Third, domesticating SHTs requires considerable work from householders for which there is currently very little support available.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Berker T, Hartmann M, Punie Y, Ward KJ (2005) Introduction. In: Berker T, Hartmann M, Punie Y, Ward KJ (eds) Domestication of media and technology. Open University Press, Maidenhead, pp 1–17
Haddon L (2006) The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The Inf Soc 22:195–203
Hargreaves T, Nye M, Burgess J (2010) Making energy visible: a qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy 38:6111–6119
Isaksson C (2014) Learning for lower energy consumption. Int J Consum Stud 38:12–17
Juntunen JK (2014) Domestication pathways of small-scale renewable energy technologies. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 10(2). Online at http://sspp.proquest.com
Lehtonen T-K (2003) The domestication of new technologies as a set of trials. J Consum Cult 3:363–384
Mennicken S, Huang EM (2012) Hacking the natural habitat: an in-the-wild study of smart homes, their development, and the people who live in them. Lect Notes Comput Sci 7319:143–160
Mennicken S, Vermeulen J, Huang EM (2014) From today’s augmented houses to tomorrow’s smart homes: new directions for home automation research. Paper presented at the UbiComp 2014, Seattle, USA, 13–17 Sept 2014
Nyborg S (2015) Pilot users and their families: inventing flexible practices in the smart grid. Sci Tech Stud 28(3):54–80
Oudshoorn N, Pinch T (2003) Introduction: how users and non-users matter. In: Oudshoorn N, Pinch T (eds) How users matter: the co-construction of users and technology. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts & London, pp 1–25
Smits M (2006) Taming monsters: the cultural domestication of new technology. Technol Soc 28:489–504
Sørensen KH (1994) Technology in use: two essays on the domestication of artefacts. Centre for technology and society working paper 2/94, Trondheim, Norway
Sørensen KH (1996) Learning technology, constructing technology. Centre for technology and society working paper 18/96, Trondheim, Norway
Strengers Y, Nicholls L (2017, In Press) Convenience and energy consumption in the smart home of the future: industry visions from Australia and beyond. Energy Res Soc Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.008
Wallenborn G, Orsini M, Vanhaverbeke J (2011) Household appropriation of electricity monitors. Int J Consum Stud 35:146–152
Winther T, Bell S (2017, In Press) Domesticating in home displays in selected British and Norwegian households. Sci Technol Stud
Wyatt S (2003) Non-users also matter: the construction of users and non-users of the internet. In: Oudshoorn N, Pinch T (eds) How users matter: the co-construction of users and technology. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts & London, pp 67–79
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hargreaves, T., Wilson, C. (2017). Domestication of Smart Home Technologies. In: Smart Homes and Their Users . Human–Computer Interaction Series(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68018-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68018-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68017-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68018-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)