Skip to main content

Pseudo Expected Improvement Matrix Criteria for Parallel Expensive Multi-objective Optimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

Many engineering optimization problems involve multiple objectives which are sometimes computationally expensive. The multi-objective efficient global optimization (EGO) algorithm which uses a multi-objective expected improvement (EI) function as the infill criterion, is an efficient approach to solve these expensive multi-objective optimization problems. However, the state-of-the-art multi-objective EI criteria are very expensive to compute when the number of objectives is higher than two, thus are not practical to use in real-world problems. In the early work, the authors have proposed three cheap-to-calculate and yet efficient multi-objective EI matrix (EIM) criteria for the expensive multi-objective optimization. In this work, the three EIM criteria are extended for parallel computing to further accelerate the search process of the multi-objective EGO algorithm. The approach selects the first candidate at the maximum of an EIM criterion, and then multiplies the EIs in the EI matrix by the influence function of the first candidate to approximate the updated EIM function. The influence function is designed to simulate the effect that the first candidate will have on the landscape of each EI function. Then the second candidate can be selected at the maximum of the approximated EIM criterion. As the process goes on, a desired number of candidates can be generated in a single optimization iteration. The proposed parallel EIM (called pseudo EIM in this work) criteria have shown significant improvements over the single-point EIM criteria in terms of number of iterations on the selected test instances. The results indicate that the proposed pseudo EIM criteria can speed up the search process of the multi-objective EGO algorithm when parallel computing is available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, Q.F., Li, H.: MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11(6), 712–731 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coello, C.C., Lamont, G.B., Van Veldhuizen, D.A.: Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems. Springer, New York (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Simpson, T.W., Booker, A.J., Ghosh, D., Giunta, A.A., Koch, P.N., Yang, R.-J.: Approximation methods in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization: a panel discussion. Struct. Multi. Optim. 27(5), 302–313 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shan, S., Wang, G.G.: Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions. Struct. Multi. Optim. 41(2), 219–241 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Forrester, A., Sóbester, A., Keane, A.: Engineering design via surrogate modelling: a practical guide. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Emmerich, M.T.M., Deutz, A.H., Klinkenberg, J.W.: Hypervolume-based expected improvement: monotonicity properties and exact computation. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Couckuyt, I., Deschrijver, D., Dhaene, T.: Fast calculation of multiobjective probability of improvement and expected improvement criteria for Pareto optimization. J. Glob. Optim. 60(3), 575–594 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bautista, D.C.: A sequential design for approximating the Pareto front using the expected Pareto improvement function. The Ohio State University, Columbus (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Svenson, J., Santner, T.: Multiobjective optimization of expensive-to-evaluate deterministic computer simulator models. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 94, 250–264 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones, D.R., Schonlau, M., Welch, W.J.: Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J. Global Optim. 13(4), 455–492 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones, D.R.: A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces. J. Global Optim. 21(4), 345–383 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhan, D., Cheng, Y., Liu, J.: Expected improvement matrix-based infill criteria for expensive multiobjective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2017.2697503

  14. Zhan, D., Qian, J., Cheng, Y.: Pseudo expected improvement criterion for parallel EGO algorithm. J. Global Optim. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-016-0484-7

  15. Deb, K., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Zitzler, E.: Scalable test problems for evolutionary multi-objective optimization, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), ETH Zürich, TIK Report No. 112 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lophaven, S.N., Nielsen, H.B., Søndergaard, J.: Dace - a matlab kriging toolbox, version 2.0 (2002). http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/projects/dace/

  17. Price, K., Rainer, M.S., Jouni, A.L.: Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawei Zhan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhan, D., Qian, J., Liu, J., Cheng, Y. (2018). Pseudo Expected Improvement Matrix Criteria for Parallel Expensive Multi-objective Optimization. In: Schumacher, A., Vietor, T., Fiebig, S., Bletzinger, KU., Maute, K. (eds) Advances in Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. WCSMO 2017. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67988-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67988-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67987-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67988-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics