Innovation and Technology Transfer Among Firms in the Agricultural Input Sector

  • Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes
  • Alexandre Magnier
  • Christos Kolympiris
Chapter
Part of the Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management book series (ITKM)

Abstract

Firms in the agricultural biotech and seed sectors have increased their R&D spending exponentially over the last three decades. The number of patents secured by major integrated biotechnology and seed firms also increased exponentially over this period. We find no evidence of strategic patenting to explain the increase in volume; the increased number of granted patents, therefore, most likely indicates accelerating product innovation in the industry. Technology transfer among private firms in this sector has been increasing as well, as reflected in a large number of licensing and cross-licensing agreements for the commercialization of patented biotech traits and seed germplasm across different suppliers. New product introductions and variety (new biotech traits and hybrids) increased significantly over the last two decades, while the average product life cycle of hybrid seeds declined. All these indicators point to accelerating product innovation and augmented product choices in this market segment.

References

  1. Alfranca, O., and W.E. Huffman. 2003. Aggregate Private R&D Investments in Agriculture: The Role of Incentives, Public Policies, and Institutions. Economic Development and Cultural Change 52 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/380585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alston, J.M., N. Kalaitzandonakes, and J. Kruse. 2014. The Size and Distribution of the Benefits from the Adoption of Biotech Soybean Varieties. In Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology, and Development, ed. S.J. Smyth, P.W.B. Phillips, and D. Castle, 728–751. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, B., and I.M. Sheldon. 2011. Endogenous R&D Investment and Market Structure: A Case Study of the Agricultural Biotechnology Industry. 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24–26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.Google Scholar
  4. Arora, A., and A. Fosfuri. 2003. Licensing the Market for Technology. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 52 (2): 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arora, A., and A. Gambardella. 2010. Ideas for Rent: An Overview of Markets for Technology. Industrial and Corporate Change 19 (3): 775–803. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arundel, A., G. van de Paal, and L. Soete. 1995. Innovation Strategies of Europe's Largest Industrial Firms: Results of the Survey for Information Sources, Public Research, Protection of Innovations and Government Programmes, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, University of Limbourg, Maastricht, PACE Report.Google Scholar
  7. Bayus, B.L., and R. Agarwal. 2007. The Role of Pre-Entry Experience, Entry Timing, and Product Technology Strategies in Explaining Firm Survival. Management Science 53 (12): 1887–1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beckie, H.J. 2011. Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management: Focus on Glyphosate. Pest Management Science 67 (9): 1037–1048.Google Scholar
  9. Boldrin, M., and D.K. Levine. 2008. Against Intellectual Monopoly. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Boyd, W. 2003. Wonderful Potencies? In Engineering Trouble: Biotechnology and Its Discontents, ed. R. Schurman and D. Kelso. Princeton, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brookes, G., and P. Barfoot. 2010. GM Crops: Global Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts 1996–2010. Dorchester, UK: PG Economics Ltd.Google Scholar
  12. Buccola, S., and Y. Xia. 2004. The Rate Of Progress in Agricultural Biotechnology. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 26 (1): 3–18.Google Scholar
  13. Carew, R. 2005. Science Policy and Agricultural Biotechnology in Canada. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 27 (3): 300–316.Google Scholar
  14. Cockburn, I.M., and M.J. MacGarvie. 2009. Patents, Thickets and the Financing of Early-Stage Firms: Evidence from the Software Industry. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 18 (3): 729–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, W.M., A. Goto, A. Nagata, R.R. Nelson, and J.P. Walsh. 2002. R&D Spillovers, Patents and the Incentives to Innovate in Japan and the United States. Research Policy 31 (8): 1349–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dierickx, I., and K. Cool. 1989. Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage. Management Science 35 (12): 1504–1511. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2632235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards, D., and J. Batley. 2010. Plant Genome Sequencing: Applications for Crop improvement. Plant Biotechnology Journal 8 (1): 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00459.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Falck-Zepeda, J.B., G. Traxler, and R.G. Nelson. 2000. Surplus Distribution from the Introduction of a Biotechnology Innovation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 (2): 360–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischer, R.A., and G.O. Edmeades. 2010. Breeding and Cereal Yield Progress. Crop Science 50 (S1): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.10.0564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foltz, J.D., K. Kim, and B. Barham. 2003. A Dynamic Analysis of University Agricultural Biotechnology Patent Production. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85 (1): 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fosfuri, A. 2006. The Licensing Dilemma: Understanding the Determinants of the Rate of Technology Licensing. Strategic Management Journal 27 (12): 1141–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuglie, K., P. Heisey, J. King, C.E. Pray, and D. Schimmelpfennig. 2012. The Contribution of Private Industry to Agricultural Innovation. Science Magazine 338 (6110): 1031–1032.Google Scholar
  23. Fuglie, K., and T. Walker. 2011. Economic Incentives and Resource Allocation in US Public and Private Plant Breeding. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 33 (3): 225–240.Google Scholar
  24. Gambardella, A., and A.M. McGahan. 2010. Business-Model Innovation: General Purpose Technologies and Their Implications for Industry Structure. Long Range Planning 43 (2): 262–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giannakas, K. 2002. Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights: Causes and Consequences. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84 (2): 482–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Graff, G.D., S.E. Cullen, K.J. Bradford, D. Zilberman, and A.B. Bennett. 2003. The Public-Private Structure of Intellectual Property Ownership in Agricultural Biotechnology. Nature Biotechnology 21 (9): 989–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Graff, G.D., D. Zilberman, and A.B. Bennett. 2010. The Commercialization of Biotechnology Traits. Plant Science 179 (6): 635–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hagedoorn, J., and M. Cloodt. 2003. Measuring Innovative Performance: Is There an Advantage in Using Multiple Indicators? Research Policy 32 (8): 1365–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heap, I. 2015. “The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds”. Retrieved 27 January 2015, from http://www.weedscience.com/summary/home.aspx.
  30. Heisey, P.W., J.L. King, and K.D. Rubenstein. 2005. Patterns of Public-Sector and Private-Sector Patenting in Agricultural Biotechnology. AgBioforum 8 (2 & 3): 89–99.Google Scholar
  31. Hoisington, D., and M. Listman. 1998. Varietal Development: Applied Biotechnology. In Maize seed Industries in Developing Countries, ed. M. Morris, 77–102. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers and CIMMYT.Google Scholar
  32. Jaffe, A.B., and J. Lerner. 2011. Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress, and What to Do About It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. James, C. 2012. Brief 44. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2012, ISAAA Brief. New York: Ithaca.Google Scholar
  34. Kalaitzandonakes, N., D. Miller, and A. Magnier. 2010. A Worrisome Crop? Regulation 33 (4): 20–26.Google Scholar
  35. Kim, K., J.D. Foltz, and B.L. Barham. 2002. Are There Synergies or Tradeoffs between Articles and Patents in University Ag-Biotech Research. Western Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meetings. Long Beach, California.Google Scholar
  36. Kortum, S., and J. Lerner. 1999. What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting? Research Policy 28 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lieberman, M.B. 1989. The Learning Curve, Technology Barriers to Entry, and Competitive Survival in the Chemical Processing Industries. Strategic Management Journal 10 (5): 431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Magnier, A., N. Kalaitzandonakes, and D. Miller. 2010. Product Life Cycles and Innovation in the US Seed Corn Industry. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 13 (3): 17–36.Google Scholar
  39. Mardis, E.R. 2011. A Decade/'S Perspective on DNA Sequencing Technology. Nature 470 (7333): 198–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Metzker, M.L. 2009. Sequencing Technologies—The Next Generation. Nature Reviews Genetics 11 (1): 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Phillips. McDougall. 2011. The Cost and Time Involved in the Discovery, Development and Authorisation of a New Plant Biotechnology Derived Trait. A Consultancy Study for Crop Life International. Available at: http://croplife.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf_files/Getting-a-Biotech-Crop-to-Market-Phillips-McDougall-Study.pdf.
  42. Pray, C.E., and K.O. Fuglie. 2001. Private Investment in Agricultural Research and International Technology Transfer in Asia, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report No. 805.Google Scholar
  43. Qaim, M. 2009. The Economics of Genetically Modified Crops. The Annual Review of Resource Economics 1: 665–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Retzinger, E.J., and C. Mallory-Smith. 1997. Classification of Herbicides by Site of Action for Weed Resistance Management Strategies. Weed Technology 11 (2): 384–393.Google Scholar
  45. Schimmelpfennig, D.E., C.E. Pray, and M.F. Brennan. 2004. The Impact of Seed Industry Concentration on Innovation: A Study of US Biotech Market Leaders. Agricultural Economics 30 (2): 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shapiro, C. 2003. Antitrust Limits to Patent Settlements. RAND Journal of Economics 34 (2): 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shi, G. 2009. Bundling and Licensing of Genes in Agricultural Biotechnology. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91 (1): 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01174.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shoemaker, R.A., J.L. Harwood, K.A. Day-Rubenstein, T. Dunahay, P.W. Heisey, L.A. Hoffman, C. Klotz-Ingram, W.W. Lin, L. Mitchell, and W.D. McBride. 2001. Economic Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 762.Google Scholar
  49. Tester, M., and P. Langridge. 2010. Breeding Technologies to Increase Crop Production in a Changing World. Science 327 (5967): 818–822. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wetterstrand, K.A. 2013. “The Cost of Sequencing a Human Genome”. National Human Genome Research Institute. Retrieved 15 May 2013, from https://www.genome.gov/sequencingcosts/.
  51. Williamson, O.E. 1991. Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes
    • 1
  • Alexandre Magnier
    • 1
  • Christos Kolympiris
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural and Applied EconomicsUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.University of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations