Advertisement

The Role and Impact of Public Research and Technology Transfer in Brazilian Agriculture

  • Geraldo B. MarthaJr
  • Eliseu Alves
Chapter
Part of the Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management book series (ITKM)

Abstract

The public sector played a pivotal role in transforming a traditional agriculture in Brazil into a modern one by leading the agricultural research and development (R&D) network in the country and by providing the majority of funds to R&D activities. The spillover effects arising from agricultural R&D were not restricted to the primary sector. A vibrant agricultural sector creates sizable markets for industrial and service sectors if they can deliver quality products at competitive prices. More broadly, the success of this science-based agriculture in Brazil provided the means for ample improvements in food and nutritional security; expanded opportunities for employment and income generation in agricultural (and associated) value chains; a more positive balance of trade; and a substantial attenuation of inflationary pressures. In the coming decades, the value of Brazilian agriculture to society will eventually be even bigger, as the so-called bio-economy gets strengthened. However, it is imperative to encourage a more intense engagement of the private sector in agricultural R&D activities in Brazil.

Successful technological scaling-up will depend upon multi-stakeholder approaches. Knowledge exchange, capacity development and strengthening, technology transfer, extension services, and well-functioning input and market chains, to minimize detrimental effects of market imperfections on technology adoption, are key components to foster the adoption of technologies. In particular, a more widespread and inclusiveness technological adoption in Brazilian agriculture will depend on successful approaches to minimize market imperfections’ effects.

References

  1. Albuquerque, A.C.S., and A.G. Silva, eds. 2008a. Agricultura tropical: quatro décadas de inovações tecnológicas, institucionais e políticas. Vol. 1, 1337p. Brasília: Embrapa.Google Scholar
  2. ———, eds. 2008b. Agricultura tropical: quatro décadas de inovações tecnológicas, institucionais e políticas. Vol. 2, 700p. Brasília: Embrapa.Google Scholar
  3. Alston, J.M., G.W. Norton, and P.G. Pardey. 1998. Science Under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting, 585p. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Alves, E. Alguns desafios que a Embrapa enfrentará. Seminário Fertbio, Londrina, 17 de setembro de 2008.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2010. Embrapa: A Successful Case of Institutional Innovation. Revista de Política Agrícola 19 (special issue): 64–72.Google Scholar
  6. Alves, E.R.A., and R.C. Silva. 2013. Qual é o problema de transferência de tecnologia do Brasil e da Embrapa? In Contribuições da Embrapa para o desenvolvimento da agricultura no Brasil, ed. E.R.A. Alves, G.S. Souza, and E.G. Gomes, 279–291. Brasília: Embrapa.Google Scholar
  7. Alves, E., G.S. Souza, and D.P. Rocha. 2012. Lucratividade da agricultura. Revista de Política Agrícola 21 (2): 45–63.Google Scholar
  8. Alves, E.R.A., G.S. Souza, D.P. Rocha, and R. Marra. 2013. Fatos marcantes da agricultura brasileira. In Contribuições da Embrapa para o desenvolvimento da agricultura no Brasil, ed. E.R.A. Alves, G.S. Souza, and E.G. Gomes, 13–45. Brasília: Embrapa.Google Scholar
  9. Ávila, A.F.D.; Souza, G.S. 2002. The Importance of Impact Assessment Studies for the Brazilian Agricultural Research System. Paper presented at the “International Conference on Impacts of Agricultural Research and Development: Why has impact assessment research not made more a difference?” San José (Costa Rica), February 4–7, 2002.Google Scholar
  10. Ávila, A.F.D., G. Stachetti, and G.L.V. Rodrigues. 2008. Avaliação dos impactos de tecnologias geradas pela Embrapa: metodologia de referência, 189p. Embrapa Informação Tecnológica: Brasília.Google Scholar
  11. Ávila, A.F.D., L. Romano, and F. Garagorry. 2010. Agricultural Productivity in Latin America and the Caribbean and Sources of Growth. In Handbook of Agricultural Economics, vol. 4, ed. P.L. Pingali and R.E. Evenson, 3713–3768. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Bacha, C.J.C. 2004. Economia e política agrícola no Brasil, 226p. São Paulo: Atlas.Google Scholar
  13. Baer, W. 2008. The Brazilian economy. 6th ed, 443p. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. CNA. 2017. Confederação da Agricultura e Pecuária do Brasil. Boletim VBP. Edição 24, abril de 2017. Brasília: CNA. 3p.Google Scholar
  15. Coelho, C. N. 2001. 70 anos de política agrícola no Brasil (1931–2001). Revista de Política Agrícola 10, edição especial, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. Cunha, A.S., C.C. Mueller, E.R.A. Alves, and J.E. Silva. 1994. Uma avaliação da sustentabilidade da agricultura nos cerrados, 256 p. IPEA: Brasília.Google Scholar
  17. Dobereiner J. Biological Nitrogen Fixation in the Tropics: Social and Economic Contributions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, v. 29, p. 771–774, 1997.Google Scholar
  18. Embrapa. 2014. Visão 2014–2034: o futuro do desenvolvimento tecnológico da agricultura brasileira, 194. Brasília: Embrapa.Google Scholar
  19. Flaherty, K., Guiducci, R.C.N., Torres, D.P., Vedovoto, G.L., Ávila, A.F., and Perez, S. Brazil: Agricultural R&D Factsheet, 2016. Available at www.asti.cgiar.org/brazil.
  20. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2000. Land Resource Potential and Constraints at Regional and Country Levels. World Soil Resources Report, 90. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  21. Furtado, C. 2005. Formação econômica do Brasil. 32nd ed, 256p. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional.Google Scholar
  22. Gasques, J.G.; Bastos, E. T.; Bacchi, M. R. P. 2009. Produtividade e Fontes de Crescimento da Agricultura. Seminário IPEA, Brasília, 08 de junho de 2009.Google Scholar
  23. Gasques, J.G., E.T. Bastos, M.R.P. Bacchi, and C. Valdes. 2010. Produtividade total dos fatores e transformações da agricultura brasileira: análise dos dados dos Censos Agropecuários. In Agricultura Brasileira: Desempenho, Desafios e Perspectivas, ed. J.G. Gasques, J.E.R. Vieira Filho, and Z. Navarro, 19–44. Brasília: IPEA.Google Scholar
  24. Gremaud, A., M.A.S. Vasconcellos, and R. Toneto Jr. 2004. Economia Brasileira Contemporânea. 5th ed. Editora Atlas: São Paulo.Google Scholar
  25. Hayami, Y., and V.W. Ruttan. 1985. Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. 2nd ed. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hurley, T.M., X. Rao, and P.G. Pardey. 2014. Reexamining the Reported Rates of Return to Food and Agricultural Research and Development. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96: 1492–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Área territorial brasileira. Available at < http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/geociencias/cartografia/default_territ_area.shtm >. Accessed on November 29th, 2016.
  28. Lopes, M.A. 2012. The Brazilian Agricultural Research for Development (ARD) System. In Improving Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems: OECD Conference Proceedings, 323–338. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lopes, M.A., and G.B. Martha Jr. 2016. Embrapa: Development of Brazilian Agriculture. In The Arab World and Latin America: Economic and Political Relations in the 21st Century, ed. F. Saddy, 305–329. London: IB Tauris.Google Scholar
  30. Maddison, A. 2011. Brazilian Development Experience from 1500 to 1929. Available at http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/ARTICLES/Brazil_1500-1929.pdf. Accessed on 15 Nov 2011.
  31. Martha Jr., G.B., and E. Alves. 2017, forthcoming. Brazil’s Agriculture Modernization and Embrapa. In The Oxford Handbook of the Brazilian Economy, ed. W. Baer, E. Amann, and C.R. Azzoni. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ministério do Meio Ambiente (MMA). 2017. Biomas. Available at http://www.mma.gov.br/biomas. Accessed on 24 Apr 2017.
  33. OECD. 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd ed, 168p. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  34. Pardey, P.G., J.M. Alston, C. Chan-Kang, E.C. Magalhães, and S.A. Vosti. 2006. International and Institutional R&D Spillovers: Attribution of Benefits Among Sources for Brazil’s New Crop Varieties. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88: 104–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thorp, R. 1998. Progress, Poverty and Exclusion: An Economic History of Latin America in the 20th Century. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  36. World Resource Institute (WRI). 2008. World Resources 2008: The Roots of Resilience – Growing the Wealth of the Poor. Washington, DC: WRI.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EmbrapaBrasiliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations