Abstract
In 2010 Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia formed a Customs Union. This union is known as a new generation of regional organizations in the post-Soviet space. The reasons of formation of such kind of Union are either economical or political. In 2015 all the above mentioned core countries formed Eurasian Economic Union with the inclusion of Armenia and Kyrgyz Republic. Statistical analysis shows that Customs Union had a significant impact on regional trade. Internal trade boosted during 2011–2012 and then tended to decline due to slowdown of Russian economy. Russian economic decline negatively impacted on regional growth and trade. Thus, objective of this paper is to determine the impact of Customs Union on regional trade with application of gravity model. By using data for the period of 2000–2015, we show that impact of Customs Union on regional trade was negative, but insignificant. These results can be explained by the structural problems of the regional economy, unfavorable external conditions, low level of economic diversification and a short period of the Customs Union functioning.
Keywords
- Kazakhstan
- Regional integration
- Eurasian Economic Union
- International trade
- Gravity model
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Aitken, N. D. (1973). The effects of the EEC and EFTA on European Trade: A temporal cross-section analysis. American Economic Review, 63(4), 881–892.
Anderson, J. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.
Anderson, J., & Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. The American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192.
Baier, S., & Bergstrand, J. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? Journal of International Economics, 71, 72–95.
Baier, S. L., Bergstrand, J. H., Egger, P., & McLaughlin, P. A. (2008). Do economic integration agreements actually work? Issues in understanding the causes and consequences of the growth of regionalism. The World Economy, 31(4), 461–497.
Baldwin, R. (2014). Multilateralising 21st regionalism. Global forum on trade. Reconciling regionalism and multilateralism in a post-Bali world (pp. 1–46). Paris: OECD Conference Centre.
Baldwin, R., & Taglioni, D. (2006). Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity equations. [online]. Accessed September 21, 2016, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w12516
Bergstrand, J. (1990). The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, the linder hypothesis and the determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade. The Economic Journal, 100(403), 1216–1229.
Deardoff, A. (1998). Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? [online]. Accessed September 22, 2016, from http://www.nber.org/chapters/c7818.pdf
Egger, P. H., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2013). The pure effects of European integration on Intra-EU core and periphery trade. The World Economy, 36(6), 701–712.
Eurasian Economic Commission. (2016). Mutual trade in goods of the Customs Union and Common Economic Space members for 2015. Statistical bulletin [online]. Accessed October 5, 2016, from http://www.eurasiancommission.org/ru/act/integr_i_makroec/dep_stat/tradestat/tables/intra/Documents/2015/12_180/I201512_2_2.pdf
Freund, C. (2010). Third-country effects of regional trade agreements. The World Economy, 33(11), 1589–1605.
Gil, S., Llorca, R., & Martinez-Serrano, J. A. (2008). Assessing the enlargement and deepening of the European Union. The World Economy, 31(9), 1253–1272.
International Trade Centre. (2016). [online]. Accessed September 20, 2016, from www.intracen.org
Khitakhunov, A., Mukhamediyev, B., & Pomfret, R. (2016). Eurasian Economic Union: Present and future perspectives. Economic Change and Restructuring, 1–19.
Lee, J. W., Park, I., & Shin, K. (2008). Proliferating regional trade arrangements: Why and whither? The World Economy, 31(12), 1525–1557.
McCallum, J. (1995). National borders matters: Canada-US regional trade patterns. The American Economic Review, 85(3), 615–623.
Montalbano, P., & Nenci, S. (2014). Assessing the trade impact of the European Neighbourhood Policy on the EU-MED Free Trade Area. Applied Economics, 46(7), 730–740.
Mukhamediyev, B., & Khitakhunov, A. (2017). Central Asian integration and its impact on regional trade and economy. In M. H. Bilgin et al. (Eds.), Country experiences in economic development, Management and entrepreneurship. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46319-3_2
Sapir, A. (2001). Domino effects in Western European Regional Trade, 1960–1992. European Journal of Political Economy, 17(2), 377–388.
Viner, J. (1950). The Customs Union issue. New York: The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
World Bank. (2012). Assessment of costs and benefits of the Customs Union for Kazakhstan. Report No. 65977-KZ [pdf]. Accessed April 25, 2015, from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/2722/659770ESW0P1230on0Final0jan0302012.pdf?sequence=1
WTO. (2010). World tariff profiles. [pdf]. Accessed July 10, 2015, from https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/tariff_profiles10_e.pdf
WTO. (2015). World tariff profiles. Accessed April 10, 2015, from https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/tariff_profiles14_e.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mukhamediyev, B., Khitakhunov, A. (2018). Impact of the Customs Union of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia on Regional Trade. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Eurasian Economic Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 8/2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67916-7_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67916-7_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67915-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67916-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)