Skip to main content

Perspectives on Internal Control and Enterprise Risk Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Eurasian Business Perspectives

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 8/1))

Abstract

Grounded on the literature review on Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) this paper aims to analyze the extent and the effectiveness of internal control as well as ERM and to explore their connection with the value creation. A theoretical lens is used to discuss whether effective internal control and ERM enhance performance and increase value creation ability. ERM is most frequently defined with the reference to the 2004 Guidance document published by Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of Treadway Commission (COSO). Proponents of COSO’s ERM Integrated Framework describe this framework as “a world-level template for best practice”, and claim that ERM used by management to enhance an organization ability to manage uncertainty and to consider how much risk to accept as it strives to increase stakeholder value. Additionally the Internal Control—Integrated Framework is a viable and suitable framework for designing, implementing, conducting and assessing the effectiveness of internal control and for reporting. The relationship between value creation and ERM is widely investigated in academic literature. Empirical studies on the value creation abilities of ERM and internal control suggest that there is a positive relation between value creation, internal control and ERM. These studies reveal that firm performance and value are enhanced by high-quality ERM adoption and implementation. Using different identifier of ERM such as Standard and Poor’s risk management ratings or presence of a Chief Risk Officer, the findings of empirical studies reveal that higher ERM quality is associated with less resource constraint, better corporate governance and better accounting performance. Additionally academic studies indicate that the risk-based communication is reinforced with ERM implication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arena, M., Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2010). The organizational dynamics of enterprise risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7, 659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, V., Benford, T., Canada, J., & Sutton, S. G. (2011). The role of strategic enterprise risk management and organizational flexibility in easing new regulatory compliance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12(3), 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, V., Benford, T., Canada, J., & Sutton, S. (2015). Leveraging integrated information systems to enhance strategic flexibility and performance: The enabling role of enterprise risk management. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 19, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, R., Bedard, J., Hoitash, R., & Yezegel, A. (2013). Enterprise risk management program quality: Determinants, value relevance, and the financial crisis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1264–1295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M., Clune, R., & Hermanson, D. (2005). Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 24(6), 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M., Pagach, D., & Warr, R. (2008). Information conveyed in hiring announcements of senior executives overseeing enterprise-wide risk management processes. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 23(3), 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COSO. (1992). Internal control – Integrated framework. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

    Google Scholar 

  • COSO. (2004). Enterprise risk management – Integrated framework executive summary. Accessed December 01, 2016, from http://www.theiia.org/media/files/virtualseminars/COSO_ERM_Integrated_Framework.pdf

  • COSO. (2013a). Internal control integrated framework, executive summary [online]. Accessed December 01, 2016, from https://na.theiia.org/standards-guidance/topics/Documents/Executive_Summary.pdf

  • COSO. (2013b). Internal control integrated framework poster [online]. Accessed December 01, 2016, from www.coso.org./Documents/COSO-ICIF-11x17-Cube-Graphic.pdf

  • DeLoach, J., & Thomson, J. (2014). Improving organizational performance and governance how the COSO frameworks can help. Research Commissioned by COSO [online]. Accessed December 01, 2016, from www.coso.org./Documents/2014-2-10-COSO-Thought-Paper.pdf

  • Gatzert, N., & Martin, M. (2015). Determinants and value of enterprise risk management: Empirical evidence from the literature. Risk Management & Insurance Review, 18(1), 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P., & Tseng, C. (2009). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(4), 301–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, M., Leverty, J., Phillips, R., & Shimpi, P. (2015). The value of investing in enterprise risk management. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2, 289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, R., & Liebenberg, A. (2011). The value of enterprise risk management. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 4, 795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, R., & Liebenberg, A. (2015). Evidence of the value of enterprise risk management. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1, 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabbour, M., & Abdel-Kader, M. (2015). Changes in capital allocation practices – ERM and organisational change. Accounting Forum, 39(4), 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsittel, D. L., & Rittenberg, L. E. (2010). COSO: Working with the academic community. Accounting Horizons, 24(3), 455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg, A., & Hoyt, R. (2003). The determinants of enterprise risk management: Evidence from the appointment of chief risk officers. Risk Management & Insurance Review, 6(1), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, S. A. (2014). An exploratory study of enterprise risk management: Pillars of ERM. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 29(3), 393–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundqvist, S. (2015). Why firms implement risk governance – Stepping beyond traditional risk management to enterprise risk management. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(5), 441–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShane, M., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E. (2011). Does enterprise risk management increase firm value? Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 26(4), 641–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, R. R. (2007). COSO enterprise risk management: Understanding the new integrated ERM framework. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, R. R. (2011). COSO enterprise risk management: Establishing effective governance, risk, and compliance processes. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, E. (2005). Enterprise risk management: A systems-thinking framework for the event identification phase. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 6, 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paape, L., & Speklé, R. (2012). The adoption and design of enterprise risk management practices: An empirical study. European Accounting Review, 21(3), 533–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagach, D., & Warr, R. (2011). The characteristics of firms that hire chief risk officers. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(1), 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razali, A., Yazid, A., & Tahir, I. (2011). The determinants of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) practices in Malaysian public listed companies. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 1(5), 202–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltanizadeh, S., Abdul Rasid, S., Mottaghi Golshan, N., & Wan Ismail, W. (2016). Business strategy, enterprise risk management and organizational performance. Management Research Review, 39(9), 1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D., Olson, D., & Dolgui, A. (2015). Decision making in enterprise risk management: A review and introduction to special issue. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 1(4), 57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author is grateful for the support provided by Galatasaray University Research Fund. This work was supported by Galatasaray University Research Fund [grant number 16.102.002].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to İdil Kaya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kaya, İ. (2018). Perspectives on Internal Control and Enterprise Risk Management. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Eurasian Business Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 8/1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67913-6_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics