Earning as Empowerment?: The Relationship Between Paid Work and Domestic Violence in Lyari, Karachi

  • Nida Kirmani
Chapter

Abstract

Based on extensive interviews in one of Karachi’s oldest working-class areas, Lyari, this chapter explores the relationship between women’s engagement in paid work, their experiences of domestic violence, and the issue of empowerment more generally. The research includes interviews with women engaged in domestic service, in the public and private education sector, in the field of health, in the service sector, and in short-term and seasonal work in factories or small-scale industries. The chapter explores women’s ability to negotiate and resist violence at the hands of their husbands and other family members. Despite the persistence of patriarchal structures, women’s narratives demonstrate the emergence of new models of womanhood at the local level as a result of wider economic, social, and cultural shifts.

References

  1. Abu-Lughod, L. 2013. Do Muslim Women Need Saving? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal, B. 1997. Bargaining and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household. Feminist Economics 3 (1): 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aizer, A. 2010. The Gender Wage Gap and Domestic Violence. The American Economic Review 100 (4): 1847–1859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anker, R., H. Melkas, and A. Korten. 2003. Gender-based Occupational Segregation in the 1990s, Working Paper No. 16. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.Google Scholar
  5. Benería, L. 2001. Shifting the Risk: New Employment Patterns, Informalization, and Women’s Work. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 15 (1): 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benería, L., and M. Floro. 2005. Distribution, Gender, and Labor Market Informalization: A Conceptual Framework with a Focus on Homeworkers. In Rethinking Informalization: Poverty, Precarious Jobs and Social Protection, pp. 9–27. Available from: https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/3716/Rethinking%20Informalization.pdf?sequence=1#page=10. Accessed 24 Dec 2016.
  7. Cruz, A., and S. Klinger. 2011. Gender-based Violence in the World of Work: Overview and Selected Annotated Bibliography, Working Paper 3. International Labour Office. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---gender/documents/publication/wcms_155763.pdf. Accessed 24 Dec 2016.
  8. Dwyer, D., and J. Bruce, eds. 1988. A Home Divided: Women and Income in the Third World. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Goetz, A.M., and R. Sen Gupta. 1994. Who Takes the Credit? Gender, Power and Control over Loan Use in Rural Credit Programmes in Bangladesh. World Development 24 (1): 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goode, W.J. 1971. Force and Violence in the Family. Journal of Marriage and Family 33 (4): 624–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heyneman, S., and J. Stern. 2013. Low Cost Private Schools for the Poor: What Public Policy Is Appropriate? International Journal of Education Development 35: 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jewkes, R. 2014. What Works to Prevent Violence Against Women and Girls? Evidence Review of the Effectiveness of Response Mechanisms in Preventing Violence Against Women and Girls. Government of UK. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/337622/evidence- review-response-mechanisms-H.pdf. Accessed 24 Dec 2016.
  13. Kabeer, N. 2003. Mainstreaming Gender in Poverty Eradication and the Millennium Development Goals. London: Commonwealth Secretariat, CIDA, IDRC Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2012. Women’s Economic Empowerment and Inclusive Growth: Labour Markets and Enterprise Development, Working Paper 1. Department for International Development (DFID) and the International Development Research Centre (IDRC). Available from: https://www.idrc.ca/sites/default/files/sp/Documents%20EN/NK-WEE-Concept-Paper.pdf. Accessed 24 Dec 2016.
  15. Kandiyoti, D. 1988. Bargaining with Patriarchy. Gender and Society 2 (3): 274–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Macmillan, R., and R. Gartner. 1999. When She Brings Home the Bacon: Labor Force Participation and the Risk of Spousal Violence Against Women. Journal of Marriage and the Family 61 (4): 947–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCloskey, L.A. 1996. Socioeconomic and Coercive Power Within the Family. Gender and Society 10 (4): 449–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Menéndez, M., J. Benach, C. Muntaner, M. Amable, and P. O’Campo. 2007. Is Precarious Employment More Damaging to Women’s Health than Men’s? Social Science and Medicine 64 (4): 776–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neville, S., L.M. Hilker, M. Humphreys, S. Husain, S. Khan, and S. Lindsey. 2014. Evaluation of the Madhya Pradesh Safe Cities Initiative: Baseline Report. The Department for International Development India. Available from: http://www.macartan.nyc/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/20150603-MP-Baseline-Report-for-SEQAS.pdf. Accessed 24 Dec 2016.
  20. Panda, P., and B. Agarwal. 2005. Marital Violence, Human Development and Women’s Property Status in India. World Development 33 (5): 823–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Quisumbing, A.R. 2003. Household Decisions, Gender and Development. A Synthesis of Recent Research. Washington, DC: IFPRI.Google Scholar
  22. Rajan, H. 2014. The Impact of Household Form and Martial Residence on the Economic Dimensions of Women’s Vulnerability to Violence. Genus 70 (2–3): 139–162.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2016. When Wife-Beating Is Not Necessarily Abuse: A Feminist and Cross-Cultural Analysis of the Concept of Abuse as Expressed by Tibetan Survivors of Domestic Violence. Violence Against Women 20: 1–25.Google Scholar
  24. Sabir, Badalkhan. 2008. Zikri Dilemmas: Origins, Religious Practices, and Political Constraints. In The Baloch and Others: Linguistic, Historical and Socio-Political Perspectives on Pluralism in Balochistan, ed. A. Korn, C. Jahani, and P. Titus, 293–326. Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar
  25. Sarwari, A. 2015. Public Transport: Letting Pakistani Women Take Back the Wheel. Dawn News. Available from: http://www.dawn.com/news/1204003. Accessed 24 Dec 2016.
  26. Sewell, W.H., Jr. 2005. The Concepts(s) of Culture. In Practicing History: New Directions in Historical Writing After the Linguistic Turn, ed. G.M. Spiegel, 76–96. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Taylor, G. 2015. Addressing Violence Against Women and Girls Through DFID’s Economic Development and Women’s Economic Empowerment Programmes. The Department for International Development. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/444143/Economic-Development-Part-A_2_.pdf. Accessed 24 Dec 2016.
  28. The World Bank. 2012. World Development Report, 2012: Gender Equality and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available from: https://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2012/Resources/7778105-1299699968583/7786210-1315936222006/Complete-Report.pdf. Accessed 24 Dec 2016.
  29. The World Economic Forum (WEF). 2014. Gender Gap Index 2014: Pakistan. Available from: http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2014/economies/#economy=PAK. Accessed 24 Dec 2016.
  30. Viqar, S. 2014. Constructing Lyari: Place, Governance and Identity in a Karachi Neighbourhood. South Asian History and Culture 5 (3): 365–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vyas, S., and C. Watts. 2009. How Does Economic Empowerment Affect Women’s Risk of Intimate Partner Violence in Low and Middle Income Countries? A Systematic Review of Published Evidence. Journal of International Development 21 (5): 577–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. World Bank. 2014. Data: ‘Labor Force, Female (% of Total Labor Force).’ Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.TOTL.FE.ZS.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nida Kirmani
    • 1
  1. 1.Lahore University of Management SciencesLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations