Abstract
This chapter provides a synthesis and reflection on the preceding chapters. In sum, my project finds that Tyson obscures their actions toward animals and the environment by talking about them abstractly or not at all. The chapter also reflects on possible future research as well as how change may be effected.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
US federal law specifies that ads “must be truthful, not misleading, and, when appropriate, backed by scientific evidence.” Enforcement of truth-in-advertising laws falls under the jurisdiction of the Federal Trade Commission with the same requirements regardless of where an ad appears (e.g., in newspapers, magazines, online) (Federal Trade Commission n.d.)
- 2.
- 3.
Some small farms have adopted a “glass walls” approach, whereby all farm operations are observable to the public. Fair Oaks Farm is one such example (http://fofarms.com/).
References
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Federal Trade Commission. n.d. Truth in Advertising. http://www.ftc.gov/news-events/media-resources/truth-advertising. Accessed 30 June 2014.
Henry, Stuart, and Dragan Milovanovic. 1996. Constitutive Criminology: Beyond Postmodernism. London: Sage.
Hillyard, Paddy, Christina Pantazis, Steve Tombs, and Dave Gordon, eds. 2004. Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. London: Pluto Press.
Machin, David, and Andrea Mayr. 2012. How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Presser, Lois. 2009. The Narratives of Offenders. Theoretical Criminology 13: 177–200.
———. 2013. Why we Harm. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Presser, Lois, and Jennifer L. Schally. 2013. Institutionalizing Harm in Tennessee: The Right of the People to Hunt and Fish. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 40: 169–184.
Schwendinger, Herman, and Julia Schwendinger. 1970. Defenders of Order or Guardians of Human Rights? Issues in Criminology 5: 123–157.
Stibbe, Arran. 2001. Language, Power and the Social Construction of Animals. Society & Animals 9: 145–161.
Wasterfors, David. 2014. Book Review: Why We Harm. Acta Sociologica 57: 271–272.
Wood, Linda A., and Rolf O. Kroger. 2000. Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schally, J.L. (2018). Taking Stock, Taking Action. In: Legitimizing Corporate Harm. Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67879-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67879-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67878-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67879-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)