Skip to main content

Edgeworth-Pareto Principle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reduction of the Pareto Set

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 126))

Abstract

This chapter introduces and discusses the basic notions of decision-making in a multicriteria environment, namely, the set of feasible alternatives, the vector criterion and the preference relation of a decision-maker. Here we formulate the multicriteria choice problem. In addition, Chap. 1 defines a pair of fundamentally important notions, the set of nondominated alternatives and the Pareto set, which are vital for the statement and rigorous substantiation of the Edgeworth-Pareto principle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Some different alternatives may have same vector values. And so, it seems correct to replace “for \(x^{{\prime }} ,\;x^{{\prime \prime }} \in X\)” with “for all \(x_{1} \in \tilde{x}_{1} ,\;x_{2} \in \tilde{x}_{2} ,\;\tilde{x}_{1} ,\tilde{x}_{2} \in \tilde{X}\), where \(\tilde{X}\) represents the aggregate of the equivalence classes induced by the preference relation \(x_{1} \sim x_{2}\) \(\Leftrightarrow\) \(f(x_{1} ) = f(x_{2} )\) on the set X.” Here \(\tilde{x}_{i}\) denotes the equivalence class induced by the element \(x_{i}\), \(i = 1,\;2\).

  2. 2.

    As easily verified, the inverse Condorcet condition [1] implies Axiom 1, but not vice versa.

  3. 3.

    Note, that for the Edgeworth-Pareto principle to be true (see Theorem 1.1), in this axiom we may consider the extension \(\succ\) not on the whole space \(R^{m}\) but merely on the Cartesian product \(Y_{1} \times Y_{2} \times \ldots \times Y_{m}\), where \(Y_{i}\) is the smallest interval including \(f_{i} (x),\;i = 1,\;2, \ldots ,\;m\).

  4. 4.

    We remark that further exposition of this chapter can be generalized to the case of “individual” preference relations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir D. Noghin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Noghin, V.D. (2018). Edgeworth-Pareto Principle. In: Reduction of the Pareto Set. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 126. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67873-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67873-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67872-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67873-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics