Advertisement

Implementation: Establishing a Sense of Community

Chapter
  • 726 Downloads

Abstract

The Implementation Stage of the WBID Model brings the results of previous stages to fruition. After concurrent activities are completed, implementation procedures begin. The major focus of implementation is creating the learning community however it is designed. For implementation to be a success, each member of the learning community must understand online teaching and learning and employ appropriate facilitation and management strategies. Personnel, budget, and time allocations are also critical to successful implementation. Final preparation activities include contacting the learners, checking that the course is functioning correctly, and conducting any necessary participant training on online learning/teaching skills.

This chapter begins with a brief overview of online teaching and learning, followed by a discussion of the activities and preparations needed for successful implementation. We devote the rest of the chapter to describing strategies for facilitating and managing an online learning community.

Keywords

Implementation Sense of community Mentors Implementation personnel Budget Training Facilitation Management 

References

  1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Oakland, CA: Babson Survey Research Group.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Lederman, D., & Jaschik, S. (2012). Conflicted: Faculty and online education. Inside Higher Ed, Babson Survey Research Group, and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/server_files/files/IHE-BSRG-Conflict.pdf.
  3. Arbaugh, J. B., & Hornik, S. (2006). Do Chickering and Gamson’s seven principles also apply to online MBAs. The Journal of Educators Online, 3(2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin, S., Ching, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. C. (2017). Online course design in higher education: A review of national and statewide evaluation instruments. TechTrends, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0215-z
  5. Baldwin, S., & Trespalacios, J. H. (2017). Evaluation instruments and good practices in online education. Online Learning, 21(2).Google Scholar
  6. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., … Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of educational research, 74(3), 379–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boettcher, J. V., & Conrad, R. M. (2016). The online teaching survival guide: Simple and practical pedagogical tips. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, K.-Z., Lowenthal, P. R., Bauer, C., Heaps, A., & Nielsen, C. (2017). Moving beyond smile sheets: A case study on the evaluation and iterative improvement of an online faculty development program. Online. Learning, 21(1), 85–111.Google Scholar
  9. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987, March). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE bulletin, 3–7.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  11. Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Collis, B. (2001). Web-based rapid prototyping as a strategy of training university faculty to teach web-based courses. In B. H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based training (pp. 459–468). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.Google Scholar
  13. Davidson-Shivers, G. V. (2002). Instructional technology in higher education. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 239–255). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Davidson-Shivers, G. V., & Rasmussen, K. (1999). Designing instruction for the WWW: A model. Paper presented at the meeting of Ed-Media ’99, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  15. Dray, B., Lowenthal, P. R., Miszkiewicz, M., & Marczynski, K. (2011). Developing a tool for assessing student readiness for online learning: A validation study. Distance Education, 32(1), 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunlap, J. C. (2005). Workload reduction in online courses: Getting some shuteye. Performance Improvement, 44(5), 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eskey, M. T., & Schulte, M. (2012). Comparing attitudes of online instructors and online college students: quantitative results for training, evaluation and administration. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 15(4). Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter154/eskey_schulte154.html.
  18. Esque, T. J. (2001). Making an impact: Building a top-performing organization from the bottom up. Silver Spring, MD: ISPI.Google Scholar
  19. Graham, C., Cagiltay, K., Lim, B. R., Craner, J., & Duffy, T. M. (2001). Seven principles of effective teaching: A practical lens for evaluating online courses. The Technology Source, 30(5). Retrieved from http://technologysource.org/article/seven_principles_of_effective_teaching/.
  20. Jaschik, S., & Lederman, D. (2014). The 2014 Inside Higher Ed Survey of Faculty Attitudes on Technology: A study by Gallup and Inside Higher Ed. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/download/form.php?width=500&height=550&iframe=true&title=Survey%20of%20Faculty%20Attitudes%20on%20Technology&file=IHE-FacTechSurvey2014%20final.pdf.
  21. Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2017). Teaching online: A practical guide (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Meyer, K. A. (2002). Quality in distance education: Focus on on-line learning (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  23. Meyer, K. A. (2004). Putting the distance learning comparison study in perspective: Its role as personal journey research. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(1). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring71/meyer71.pdf.
  24. Mourier, P., & Smith, M. (2001). Conquering organizational change. Atlanta, GA: CEP Press.Google Scholar
  25. Northrup, P. T. (2002). Online learners’ preferences for interaction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 219–26.Google Scholar
  26. Penn State University. (n.d.). Peer Review of Online Instruction. Retrieved from http://facdev.e-education.psu.edu/evaluate-revise/peerreviewonline.
  27. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  28. Quality Matters. (2014). Standards from the Quality Matters Higher Education Rubric (5th ed.). Annapolis, MD: Quality Matters. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org Google Scholar
  29. Rasmussen, K. L. (2002, June). Online mentoring: A model for supporting distance learners. Paper presented at the ED-MEDIA 2002—World Conferenc on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  30. Rasmussen, K. L., Davidson-Shivers, G. V., & Savenye, W. C. (2011). The near future of technology in higher education. In D. Surry, J. Stefurak, & R. Gray (Eds.), Technology in higher education: Social and organizational aspects (pp. 326–342). Hershey, PA: Information Service Reference/IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvaek, S. (2015). Teaching and learning at distance: Foundations of distance education (6th ed.). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Spector, J. M., & de la Teja, I. (2001). Competencies for online teaching. ERIC Digest, ED-99-CO-0005. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology. Retrieved March 18, 2004, from http://www.ibstpi.org Google Scholar
  33. Stavredes, T. (2011). Effective online teaching: Foundations and strategies for student success. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  34. Stone, M. T., & Perumean-Chaney, S. (2011). The benefits of online teaching for traditional classroom pedagogy: A case study for improving face-to-face instruction. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7, 393–400.Google Scholar
  35. Tirrell, T., & Quick, D. (2012). Chickering’s seven principles of good practice: Student attrition in community college online courses. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(8), 580–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu, H., & Morris, L. (2007). Collaborative course development for online courses. Innovative Higher Education, 32(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9033-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zachary, L. J. (2012). The mentor’s guide: Facilitating effective learning relationships (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

©  Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Counseling and Instructional ScienceUniversity of South AlabamaMobileUSA
  2. 2.Division of Research and Strategic InnovationUniversity of West FloridaPensacolaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Educational TechnologyBoise State UniversityBoiseUSA

Personalised recommendations