Skip to main content

Introduction: Borderlands and Liminality Across Philosophy and Literature

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Borderlands and Liminal Subjects

Abstract

A border is but a line extending infinitely, widthlessly, and abstractly; yet the moment this line is delimited and inscribed upon a map or etched within the earth, it takes on new social meaning. Borders are found nowhere in nature but where human beings impose them, and they are imposed with a purpose. A border, then, may be better understood as being more than a line: it is a physical limit. Useful, it locates the division between things, their beginnings, and their endings. We draw borders between nation states, transforming rivers, mountains, and other arbitrary features into the difference between the sovereignty of “us” and “them.” We build fences around property to distinguish between that which we possess and that which we do not. We delimit with borders those things which we identify as part of our self from those things that we have rejected as “outside.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Josiah McC. Heyman , “The Mexico -United States Border in Anthropology: A Critique and Reformulation.” Journal of Political Ecology 1 (1994): 43–44.

  2. 2.

    Ibid., 47–48.

  3. 3.

    Ibid., 60.

  4. 4.

    Akhil Gupta and James Ferguson . “Beyond ‘Culture’: Space , Identity , and the Politics of Difference.” Cultural Anthropology 1 (1992): 7.

  5. 5.

    Ibid.

  6. 6.

    Ibid.

  7. 7.

    Ibid., 17.

  8. 8.

    Ibid., 18.

  9. 9.

    Ibid.

  10. 10.

    Victor Turner , The Ritual Process (New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction, 1997): 15.

  11. 11.

    Ibid., 125.

  12. 12.

    Ibid., 103.

  13. 13.

    Gloria Anzaldúa , Borderlands/La Frontera (San Francisco: Aunt Lute Press, 1999): 25.

  14. 14.

    Turner, Ritual, 95.

  15. 15.

    Anzaldúa , Borderlands, 44.

  16. 16.

    Ibid., 60–61.

  17. 17.

    Gloria Anzaldúa , “(Un)natural bridges, (Un)safe spaces ,” The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader (Durham: Duke University Press, 2009): 248.

  18. 18.

    Gloria Anzaldúa , “Speaking Across the Divide,” The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader (Durham: Duke University Press, 2009): 291.

  19. 19.

    Gloria Anzaldúa , “Bearing Witness,” The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader (Durham: Duke University Press, 2009): 278.

  20. 20.

    Anzaldúa , “(Un)natural bridges, (Un)safe spaces ,” 247.

  21. 21.

    Chela Sandoval , Methodologies of the Oppressed (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000): 32–33.

  22. 22.

    Ibid., 57.

  23. 23.

    Ibid., 58.

  24. 24.

    Homi Bhabha . The Location of Culture . (London: Routledge, 1994): 53.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., 54.

  26. 26.

    Ibid., 71.

  27. 27.

    Ibid., 56.

  28. 28.

    Jacques Derrida , On the Name , trans. David Wood, John P. Leavey, Jr., and Ian McLeod (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1995): 92.

  29. 29.

    Plato , Timaeus , trans. R.G. Bury (Boston: Harvard University Press, 1929), 50c.

  30. 30.

    Parmenides DK 6, Kingsley’s translation in Reality (Inverness: Golden Sufi Press, 2003), 83.

  31. 31.

    Kingsley , Reality, 99–101 and notes on 565. The Ancient Greek word trihodos, literally “three ways,” refers to a crossroads shaped like a “Y” where a traveler must choose between two paths forward (“twin-heads ”).

  32. 32.

    Mitchell Miller , “Ambiguity and Transport: Reflections on the Proem to Parmenides’ Poem,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30, (2006): 3. “The goddess picks out or highlights ‘is’ by pointedly suppressing its subject (and, possibly, predicate). The effect is to reverse the usual order of the conspicuous and the inconspicuous: by eliding the normally conspicuous subject (and, possibly, predicate), the goddess brings the normally inconspicuous ‘is’ to the front and centre and challenges us to reflect upon it.”

  33. 33.

    Parmenides poem DK 8, Kingsley’s translation in Reality, 190–191.

  34. 34.

    Parmenides poem DK 7, Kingsley’s translation in Reality, 120.

  35. 35.

    Karen Warren , “Quilting Ecofeminist Philosophy” in Environmental Ethics: Convergence and Divergence, eds. Richard G. Armstrong and Susan J. Boltzer (New York: McGraw Hill, 2004), 418.

  36. 36.

    Ibid.

  37. 37.

    Donna J. Haraway , Simians , Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (London: Free Association Books Ltd., 1991), 151–153.

Bibliography

  • Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1999. Borderlands/La Frontera. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009a. Bearing Witness. In The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader, ed. AnaLouise Keating, 277–279. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009b. Speaking Across the Divide. In The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader, ed. AnaLouise Keating, 243–248. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009c. (Un)natural Bridges, (Un)safe Spaces. In The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader, ed. AnaLouise Keating, 282–294. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, Homi. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1995. On the Name. Trans. David Wood, John P. Leavey, Jr., and Ian McLeod. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Akhil, and James Ferguson. 1992. Beyond ‘Culture’: Space, Identity, and the Politics of Difference. Cultural Anthropology 1: 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, Josiah McC. 1994. The Mexico-United States Border in Anthropology: A Critique and Reformulation. Journal of Political Ecology 1: 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, Luce. 1985. This Sex Which Is Not One. Trans. Catherine Porter with Carolyn Burke. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley, Peter. 2003. Reality. Inverness: Golden Sufi Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Mitchell. 2006. Ambiguity and Transport: Reflections on the Proem to Parmenides’ Poem. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30: 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 1929. Timaeus. Trans. R.G. Bury. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, Chela. 2000. Methodologies of the Oppressed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Victor. 1997. The Ritual Process. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Karen. 2004. Quilting ecofeminist philosophy. In Environmental Ethics: Convergence and Divergence, ed. Richard G. Armstrong and Susan J. Boltzer, 416–428. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Elbert Decker, J., Winchock, D. (2017). Introduction: Borderlands and Liminality Across Philosophy and Literature. In: Elbert Decker, J., Winchock, D. (eds) Borderlands and Liminal Subjects. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67813-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics