Advertisement

Perceptions of Relevance of English Education at Secondary School

  • Anna JeevesEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 34)

Abstract

The chapter focuses on Icelandic students’ perceptions of the relevance of studying English at school. Little research has been done into compulsory language learning at school in a context of extensive exposure outside the classroom and with relevance to second language learning motivation. Semi-structured interviews were taken in Icelandic. Sixteen participants at secondary school, aged 18–21, related their views on studying English in the present time frame. Twenty-two interviews with young Icelanders at university or in employment, aged 19–28, provided retrospective observations on secondary school English and its relevance to language needs after school.

The importance of Iceland as a new research context was revealed. Although advanced proficiency is needed for tertiary study and employment, the high level of exposure to English in Iceland means that some school learners see formal study as an anomaly. The relevance of English is presented as an individual, dynamic relationship between the present, past and future. Many participants at university and in employment described clearly their current needs in English and of the increased proficiency gained at secondary school. Rich qualitative data obtained also show that Iceland stands outside present paradigms of second-language learning motivation. An adapted framework attempts to encompass Iceland. This model may also suit other countries in Northern Europe where exposure to English is similar. Finally suggestions are made for areas of focus for learners and teachers of English in Iceland.

References

  1. Arnbjörnsdóttir, B. (2007). English in Iceland: Second language, foreign language, or neither? In B. Arnbjörnsdóttir & H. Ingvarsdóttir (Eds.), Teaching and learning English in Iceland: In honour of Auður Torfadóttir (pp. 51–78). Reykjavík: Stofnun Vigdísar Finnbogadóttur.Google Scholar
  2. Arnbjörnsdóttir, B. (2009). Enska í háskólanámi. In R. Þráinsdóttir & M. Sigurðsson (Eds.), Milli mála (pp. 77–94). Reykjavík: Háskólaútgáfan/Stofnun Vigdísar Finnbogadóttur.Google Scholar
  3. Arnbjörnsdóttir, B. (2011). Exposure to English in Iceland: A Quantitative and Qualitative Study. Ráðstefnurit Netlu – Menntakvika 1–10. http://netla.hi.is/menntakvika2011/004.pdf
  4. Arnbjörnsdóttir, B., & Ingvarsdóttir, H. (2010). Coping with English at University: Students’ Beliefs. Ráðstefnurit Netlu – Menntakvika 1–16. http://netla.khi.is/menntakvika2010/008.pdf
  5. Arnbjörnsdóttir, B., & Ingvarsdóttir, H. (2012). English in Iceland: Using Two Languages in Academia. Paper presented at the Hugvísindaþing Reykjavík 9–10 March.Google Scholar
  6. Berman, R. (2007). Transfer of writing skills between languages. In B. Arnbjörnsdóttir & H. Ingvarsdóttir (Eds.), Teaching and learning English in Iceland: In honour of Auður Torfadóttir (pp. 79–100). Reykjavík: Stofnun Vigdísar Finnbogadóttur.Google Scholar
  7. Björkman, B. (2008). ‘So where we are?’ Spoken lingua franca English at a technical university in Sweden. English Today, 94(2), 35–41.Google Scholar
  8. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, J. A. (2006). English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language Teaching, 39(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cook, V. (2008). Second language learning and language teaching (4th ed.). London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
  13. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Csizér, K., & Kormos, J. (2009). Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behaviour: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 98–119). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  16. de Paiva, B. M. M., & Foster-Cohen, S. H. (2004). Exploring the relationships between theories of second language acquisition and relevance theory. Second Language Research, 20(3), 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  18. Dörnyei, Z. (2009a). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  19. Dörnyei, Z. (2009b). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dörnyei, Z. (2010). Researching motivation: From integrativeness to the ideal L2 self. In S. Hunston & D. Oakey (Eds.), Introducing applied linguistics: Concepts and skills (pp. 74–83). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  23. European Commission. (2012). First European survey on language competences – Final report. http://ec.europa.eu/languages/policy/strategic-framework/documents/language-survey-final-report_en.pdf. Accessed 23April 2016.
  24. Foster-Cohen, S. H. (2004). Relevance theory, action theory and second language communication strategies. Second Language Research, 20(3), 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gardner, R. C. (1960). Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. Ph.D., McGill, Montreal. http://publish.uwo.ca/~gardner/docs/phd.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2011.
  26. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13(4), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1965). Language aptitude, intelligence and second-language achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56(4), 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  29. Giorgi, A. (1997). The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 28(2), 235. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=67720&site=ehost-live. Accessed 5 April 2010.
  30. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  31. Hayes, D. P. (2006). A Spectrum of natural texts: Measurements of their lexical demand levels. Ithaca: Department of Sociology, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  32. Hellekjær, G. O. (2010). Lecture comprehension in English-Medium Higher Education. Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies, 45, 11–34. http://download2.hermes.asb.dk/archive/download/Hermes-45-hellekj%C3%A6r.pdf. Accessed 5 April 2013.
  33. Hellekjær, G. O. (2012). A survey of English use and needs in Norwegian export firms. Hermes – Journal of Language and. Communication Studies, 28, 7–18.Google Scholar
  34. Henry, A., & Apelgren, B. M. (2008). Young learners and multilingualism: A study of learner attitudes before and after the introduction of a second foreign language to the curriculum. System, 36(4), 607–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henry, A., & Goddard, A. (2015). Bicultural or hybrid? The second language identities of students on an English-mediated university program in Sweden. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 14(4), 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Higgins, E. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(4), 209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hilmarsson-Dunn, A. (2009). The impact of English on language education policy in Iceland. European Journal of Language Policy, 1(1), 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hjørland, B. (2010). The foundation of the concept of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 217–237.Google Scholar
  40. Hjørland, B., & Sejer Christensen, F. (2002). Work tasks and socio-cognitive relevance: A specific example. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(11), 960–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. http://www.jstor.org/stable/327317 Accessed 18 May 2013.
  42. Icelandic Ministry of Education. (2012). The Icelandic national curriculum guide for upper secondary school: general section: 2012. Reykjavík: Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. http://eng.menntamalaraduneyti.is/publications/curriculum/. Accessed 1 Sept 2013.
  43. Jeeves, A. (2010). English at secondary school: Perceptions of relevance. Ráðstefnurit Netlu – Menntakvika 2010, 1–16. http://netla.khi.is/menntakvika2010/002.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2011.
  44. Jeeves, A. (2012). “Being able to speak English is one thing, knowing how to write it is another”: Young Icelanders’ perceptions of writing in English. Netla – Veftímarit um uppeldi og menntun, 1–18. http://netla.hi.is/greinar/2012/ryn/012.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2012.
  45. Jeeves, A. (2013). Relevance and the L2 self in the context of Icelandic secondary school learners: Learner views. Reykjavík: Ph.D., University of Iceland. http://hdl.Handle.Net/1946/16755. Accessed 22 Oct 2013.
  46. Jeeves, A. (2014). The relevance of English language learning in a changing linguistic environment in Iceland: The L2 self of young Icelanders. Multilingua - Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 33(3–4), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2014-0013. Google Scholar
  47. Jeeves, A. (2015). Learning English in contemporary Iceland – The attitudes and perceptions of Icelandic youth. In A. R. Linn, N. Bermel, & G. Ferguson (Eds.), Attitudes towards English in Europe (pp. 271–295). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  48. Johnson, L. S. (2000). The relevance of school to career: A study in student awareness. Journal of Career Development, 26(4), 263–276.Google Scholar
  49. Kember, D., Ho, A. H., & Hong, C. (2008). The importance of establishing relevance in motivating student learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9, 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787408095849. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kormos, J., & Csizér, K. (2008). Age-related differences in the motivation of learning English as a foreign language: Attitudes, selves, and motivated learning behavior. Language Learning, 58(2), 327–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Chaos/complexity theory: The boundlessness of potentiality. Paper presented at the Nordand 10 Konference om Nordens sprog some andet- og fremmedsprof, Reykjavík.Google Scholar
  53. Little, D. (2004). Democracy, discourse and learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom. Utbildning & Demokrati, 13, 105–126.Google Scholar
  54. Little, D. (2006). The common European framework of reference for languages: Content, purpose, origin, reception and impact. Language Teaching, 39, 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible Selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mercer, S. (2011). Towards an Understanding of Language Learner Self-Concept. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. (2016). http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/relevance. Accessed 20 Feb 16.
  58. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. J. (2004). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review, 16(1), 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Norton, B. (2001). Non-participation, imagined communities and the language classroom. In M. P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning. New directions in research (pp. 159–171). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  61. Ómarsson, I. H. (2016). Education chat on language technology. http://ingvihrannar.com/menntaspjall-um-maltaekni/. Accessed 24 April 16.
  62. Petzold, R., & Berns, M. (2000). Catching up with Europe: English in Hungary. World Englishes, 19(1): 113–124. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-971X.00159/pdf. Accessed 26 April 2013.
  63. Pitkänen-Huhta, A., & Nikula, T. (2013). Teenagers making sense of their foreign language practices: Individual accounts indexing social discourses. In P. Benson & L. Cooker (Eds.), The applied linguistic individual: Sociocultural approaches to identity, agency and autonomy (pp. 104–118). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing Ltd..Google Scholar
  64. Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reid, K., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2005). Exploring lived experience. The Psychologist, 18(1): 20–23. The IPA website: www.psyc.bbk.ac.uk/ipa Accessed 20 Feb 12.
  66. Rindal, U. (2010). Constructing identity with L2: Pronunciation and attitudes among Norwegian learners of English. Journal of SocioLinguistics, 14(2), 240–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rindal, U., & Piercy, C. (2013). Being ‘neutral’? English pronunciation among Norwegian learners. World Englishes, 32(2), 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  69. Rodgers, M. P. H., & Webb, S. (2011). Narrow viewing: The vocabulary in related television programs. TESOL Quarterly, 45(4), 689–717. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.268062. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 26(6), 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sigurðardóttir, G. (2007). The development of form and function of conjunctive relations in expository writing. In B. Arnbjörnsdóttir & H. Ingvarsdóttir (Eds.), Teaching and learning English in Iceland: In honour of Auður Torfadóttir (pp. 101–132). Reykjavík: Stofnun Vigdísar Finnbogadóttur.Google Scholar
  72. Skehan, P. (1997). Individual differences in second-language learning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  73. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, methods and research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Serber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  75. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  76. Sundqvist, P., & Olin-Scheller, C. (2013). Classroom vs. extramural English: Teachers dealing with demotivation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 7(6), 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sundqvist, P., & Sylvén, L. K. (2014). Language-related computer use: Focus on young L2 English learners in Sweden. ReCALL European Association for. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000232. Google Scholar
  78. Torfadóttir, A. (1991). Könnun á lesskilningi meðal 1. árs nema í Kennaraháskóla Íslands vorið 1990. Málfríður: Tímarít samtaka tungumálakennara, 7(1)Google Scholar
  79. Torfadóttir, A. (2003). Könnun á orðaforða í ensku. Uppeldi og menntun, 12, 65–77.Google Scholar
  80. Trochim, W. M. K. (2006). Qualitative Validity. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/qualval.php
  81. Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 215–228). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  82. Ushioda, E. (2011). Motivating learners to speak as themselves. In G. Murray, X. A. Gao, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning (pp. 11–24). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  83. Vang, P. (2013). Motivating English language study among Master’s students: The case for summary writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 13(1), 163–186.Google Scholar
  84. Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009). Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59(2), 335–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00509.x. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yang, J.-S., & Kim, T.-Y. (2011). The L2 motivational self-system and perceptual learning styles of Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Swedish students. English Teaching, 66(1), 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fjölbrautaskólinn í GarðabæGarðabæIceland

Personalised recommendations