Skip to main content

Towards a Post-crisis Urban Agenda: Learning from Mega-Events

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mega-Events and Legacies in Post-Metropolitan Spaces

Part of the book series: Mega Event Planning ((MEGAEP))

  • 456 Accesses

Abstract

On the base of the different results of the case studies, previously analyzed, this chapter provides a first conclusion of the book, by stressing the potential contribution of mega-events in redefining scales and contents of contemporary urban policies . In particular, it aims at emphasizing how Expos have been evolving, as well as how they could develop in the future according to current needs for a post-crisis urban agenda . At this purpose, the reference to German IBAs serves as an example for a theoretical reflection on the necessary involvement of mega-events within new urban agendas , because of their frequency and, moreover, their capability to synthesize (in time and space) the complexity of contemporary urban phenomena in their re-configuration from denser urban cores to wider post-metropolitan spaces . Furthermore, this reference to German IBAs specifically serves as a suggestion to the BIE about the opportunities provided by a radically different event model, that is widespread and more focused on the issues of economic, environmental, and social sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Chap. 1.

  2. 2.

    See Chaps. 2, 3, 4 and 5.

  3. 3.

    Considering the visitor attractiveness of a World’s or International Fair in both the medium range (according to the ratio visitors/residents within 500 km from the exhibition venue) and the long range (according to the increase of passengers in the proximal airport system), the Shanghai Expo 2010 (73 million visitors) can be considered successful, the Milan Expo 2015 (21.5 million visitors) mediocre, whereas the Lisbon Expo 1998 (11 million visitors) and the Zaragoza Expo 2008 (5.6 million visitors) unsuccessful (CityRailways 2016).

  4. 4.

    See Paragraph 5.4.

  5. 5.

    Furthermore—as the above-mentioned samples of the Seville post-Expo 1992 or the Milan Bicocca Tecnocity have already highlighted—this vision and management could be planned through an incremental approach, in order to avoid risks connected to a casual incomplete implementation, that can penalize urban projects and contexts.

  6. 6.

    As highlighted in Chaps. 2 and 3, while the bidding phase (2006–2007) was implemented before the explosion of the 2008 crisis, the organizing phase (2008–2015) was affected by the world and local economic recession.

  7. 7.

    See Chap. 3.

  8. 8.

    See Chaps. 2 and 3.

  9. 9.

    See Chap. 4.

  10. 10.

    Indeed, a part from its high local and supra-local accessibility, one of the reasons of this choice related to the need of the Milan Trade Fair Foundation to exploit the real estate value of the areas it owned in the surrounding of its new exhibition venue—520,000 sqm of the 1,048,000 sqm totally involved by the Expo site—in order to recover part of the costs due to its development and management.

  11. 11.

    At first, in post-industrial economies of the so-called global north and, then, in developing countries.

  12. 12.

    See Chap. 1.

  13. 13.

    For what concerns the Summer Games, the withdrawal of Rome from the 2020 Olympics bid (due to financial troubles of the Italian Government), the withdrawal of Boston (because of negative polls), Budapest (because of a petition), Hamburg (because of a negative referendum), and Rome (because of financial troubles of the Rome Municipality) for the 2024 Olympics bid, the withdrawal of Shanghai and Amsterdam (because of negative opinions by local authorities), as well as Vienna (because of negative polls) to the 2028 Olympics bid. Concerning the Winter Games, the withdrawal of Oslo from the 2022 Olympics bid (because of negative polls), the withdrawal of Barcelona (because of negative opinions by local authorities), and Graubunden (because of a negative referendum) for the 2026 Olympics bid (Di Vita 2017b). However, against this trend, the current Italian Government (chaired by the Prime Minister Paolo Gentiloni), Lombardy Regional Government (chaired by the President Roberto Maroni), and Milan City Council (chaired by the Mayor Giuseppe Sala) are supporting the preliminary proposal recently expressed by the Italian National Olympic Committee to candidate Milan and the Alpine Valtellina to host the 2026 or the 2030 Winter Olympics.

  14. 14.

    Referring to these issues, a roundtable entitled ‘The Planning Legacy of Mega Events during/after the World Crisis’ was organized within the 2017 AESOP Annual Conference (Lisbon, July 11–14, 2017) by Stefano Di Vita (Politecnico di Milano) and Mark Wilson (Michigan State University) (web site: www.aesop2017.pt).

  15. 15.

    See Chap. 3.

  16. 16.

    As also exemplified by the four case studies of this book: that is, the Oceans in the Lisbon Expo 1998; the water in the Zaragoza Expo 2008; the cities’ sustainability in the Shanghai Expo 2010; and the food and nutrition in the Milan Expo 2015.

  17. 17.

    See Paragraph 6.1.

  18. 18.

    In German, Internationale Bauausstellung.

  19. 19.

    Web site: http://www.iba-emscherpark.de/.

  20. 20.

    Web site: http://www.iba-parkstad.nl/en.

  21. 21.

    The participant Municipalites were Duisburg, Oberhausen, Mulheiman der Ruhr, Bottrop, Essen, Gladbeck, Gelsenkirchen, Herne, Herten, Recklinghausen, Bochum, Castrop-Rauxel, Waltrop, Dortmund, Lunen, Bergkamen, and Kamen.

  22. 22.

    Through a total investment of 2 billion € (both public and private).

  23. 23.

    The cooperating Municipalites have been Bergkamen, Bochum, Bottrop, Bönen, Castrop-Rauxel, Datteln, Dinslaken, Dorsten, Dortmund, Duisburg, Essen, Fröndenberg, Gelsenkirchen, Gladbeck, Hagen, Haltern am See, Hamm, Hattingen, Herdecke, Herne, Herten, Holzwickede, Kamen, Kamp-Lintfort, Lünen, Marl, Moers, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Neukirchen-Vluyn, Oberhausen, Oer-Erkenschwick, Recklinghausen, Schermbeck, Schwerte, Selm, Unna, Voerde, Waltrop, Werne, Wetter, and Witten.

  24. 24.

    Accordingly, the Strategy Europe 2020 promoted by the European Union, as well as the related funding program Horizon 2020 have identified some strategic issues: from the implementation of more collaborative and inclusive approaches, to the promotion of new productive activities or the supply of new services, also due to the exploitation of digital technologies.

References

  • Anderson, Chris, Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Publishing Group, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armondi, Simonetta, “Urban Change and Geographies of Production in North East Milan”, In Armondi, Simonetta and Di Vita, Stefano (eds.), Milan: Productions, Spatial Patterns and Urban Change. London and New York: Routledge, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balducci, Alessandro, Fedeli, Valeria and Curci, Francesco (eds.), Post-Metropolitan Territories. Looking for a New Urbanity. London and New York: Routledge, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balducci, Alessandro, Fedeli, Valeria and Pasqui, Gabriele (eds.), Strategic Planning for Contemporary Urban Regions. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin R., If Mayors Ruled the World. Dysfunctional Nations, Rising Cities. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basso, Matteo, Grandi eventi e politiche urbane. Governare «routine eccezionali»: un confronto internazionale. Milano: Guerini e Associati, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battisti, Emilio, Battisti, Francesca, Di Vita Stefano and Guerritore, Camilla, Expo Diffusa e Sostenibile. Milano: Unicopli-DPA (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolocan Goldstein, Matteo, “Scala Geografica → Spazialità Urbana. Ripensare il mondo attraverso le città”. In Perulli, Paolo (ed.), Terra mobile. Atlante della società globale. Torino: Einaudi, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolocan Goldstein, Matteo, “Post-Expo Geographical Scenarios”. Urbanistica 155 (2015): 118–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botto, Isabella Susi, and Di Vita, Stefano, Oltre l’Expo 2015. Tra dimensione ordinaria e straordinaria delle politiche urbane. Roma: Carocci, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Neil (ed.), Implosions/Explosions. Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization. Berlin: Jovis Verlag, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Neil and Keil, Roger, The Global Cities Reader. London and New York: Routledge, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruzzese, Antonella, “Creative Production and Urban Regeneration in Milan”, In Armondi, Simonetta and Di Vita, Stefano (eds.), Milan: Productions, Spatial Patterns and Urban Change. London and New York: Routledge, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruzzese, Antonella and Di Vita, Stefano, “Learning from (Milan) Expo”. Territorio 77 (2016): 95–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broudehoux, Anne-Marie and Sánchez, Fernanda, “The Politics of Mega-Event Planning in Rio de Janeiro: Contesting the Olympic City of Exception”. In Viehoff, Valerie and Poynter, Gavin (eds.), Mega-Event Cities: Urban Legacies of Global Sport Events. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel, The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Hoboken: Wiley, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • CityRailways, “Expo 2015: un confronto ragionato con le altre edizioni”. [online] http://www.cityrailways.net/studi-e-tecnica/2016/1/6/expo-2015-un-co/ (2016).

  • Deng, Ying, Poon, S.W. and Chan, E.H.W., “Planning Mega-Event Built Legacies. A case of Expo 2010”. Habitat International 53 (2016): 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Vita, Stefano, Milano Expo 2015, un’occasione di sviluppo sostenibile. Milano: Franco Angeli, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Vita, Stefano, “The 2015 Universal Exposition Along the Time: From the Bidding Phase to the Post-Event”. Urbanistica 155 (2015): 102–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Vita, Stefano, “Planning and Governing Large Events in Italy: From Milan to Rome”. Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali 119 (2017a): 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Vita, Stefano, “The Growing Disaffection to World Events. The Rome Withdrawal to the 2024 Olympics bid within the Conflicts between Extraordinary and Ordinary Policies and Plans”. Presentation at the American Association of Geographers Annual Conference, Boston (USA), April 5–9, (2017b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Vita, Stefano and Wilson, Mark, “Planning and Managing Urban Spectacle”. Mimeo (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierwechter, Yonn, Urban Sustainability Through Smart Growth. Cham: Springer, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, Richard, The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frainstein, Susan S., The Just City. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fregolent, Laura and Savino, Michelangelo (eds.), Città e politiche in tempo di crisi. Milano: Franco Angeli, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furrer, Philippe, “Giochi olimpici sostenibili: utopia o realtà?” In Dansero, Egidio and Segre, Anna (eds.), Il territorio dei grandi eventi. Riflessioni e ricerche guardando a Torino 2006. Roma: Bollettino della Società Geografica, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, Christopher, “Between Discourse and Reality: The Un-sustainability of Mega-Event Planning”. Sustainability 5 (2013): 3926–3940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, Edward, Triumph of the City. How our Greatest Invention Makes us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier and Happier. New York: The Penguin Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruneau, Richard and Horne, John (eds.), Mega-Events and Globalization. Capital and Spectacle in a Changing World Order. London and New York: Routledge, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guala, Chito, Mega Eventi. Immagini e legacy dalle Olimpiadi alle Expo. Roma: Carocci, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guallart, Vincente, The Self-Sufficient City. New York: Actar, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter and Pain, Kathy (eds.), The Polycentric Metropolis. Learning from Mega-City Regions in Europe. London: Earthscan, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David, Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. New York: Verso Books, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrschel, Tassilo and Newman, Peter, Cities as International Actors. Urban and Regional Governance: Beyond the Nation State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschberg, Peter, Dougherty, Dale and Kadanoff, Marcia, Maker City: A Practical Guide for Reinventing our Cities. San Francisco: Maker Media, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Bruce and Bradley, Jennifer, The Metropolitan Revolution. How Cities and Metros Are Fixing our Broken Politics and Fragile Economy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knieling, Jorg and Othengrafen, Frank (eds.), Cities in Crisis. London and New York: Routledge, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzani, Arturo, Città territorio urbanistica tra crisi e contrazione, Milano: Franco Angeli, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monclús, Javier, “International Exhibitions and Urban Design Paradigms”. In Freestone, Robert and Amati, Marco (eds.), Exhibitions and the Development of Modern Planning Culture. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, 2014: 225–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morandi, Corinna, Milan: The Great Urban Transformation. Venezia: Marsilio, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morandi, Corinna, “Oltre Expo: con quali prospettive?” Eyesreg 5, 2 (2015): 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morandi, Corinna, “Culture-Led Minor Events: Just a Way to Increase Attractiveness or a Long Lasting Perspective for Cities’ Agendas”. Presentation at the American Association of Geographers Annual Conference, Boston (USA), April 5–9, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morandi, Corinna, Rolando, Andrea and Di Vita, Stefano, From Smart City to Smart Region. Digital Services for an Internet of Places. Cham: Polimi Springerbrief, Springer, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Martin, “The Mega-Event Syndrome: Why So Much Goes Wrong in Mega-Event Planning and What to Do About It”. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81:1 (2015): 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, Francesc, “Urbanalisation and City Mega-Events. From ‘Copy & Paste’ Urbanism to Urban Creativity”. In Viehoff, Valerie and Poynter, Gavin (eds.), Mega-Event Cities: Urban Legacies of Global Sport Events. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • MVRDV, The Region Maker: Rhein Ruhr City. Berlin: Hatje Cantz, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacchi, Carolina, “Sharing Economy: Makerspaces, Co-working Spaces, Hybrid Workplaces, and New Social Practices”, In Armondi, Simonetta and Di Vita, Stefano (eds.), Milan: Productions, Spatial Patterns and Urban Change. London and New York: Routledge, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasqui, Gabriele, “Expo 2015 and Milan: Intertwined Stories”. Urbanistica 155 (2015): 106–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasqui, Gabriele, Briata, Paola and Fedeli, Valeria (eds.), Urban@it—Centro nazionale di studi per le politiche urbane. Il rapporto sulle città. Le agende urbane delle città italiane. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perulli, Paolo, The Urban Contract: Community, Governance and Capitalism. London and New York: Routledge, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponzini, Davide and Nastasi, Michele, Starchitecture: Scenes, Actors and Spectacles in Contemporary Cities. Torino: Allemandi, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poynter, Gavin and MacRury, Iain (eds.), Olympic Cities: 2012 and the Remaking of London. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, Jeremy, The Third Industrial Revolution. How Lateral Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Catherine L., Lee, David Jung-Hwi, Meijers, Everet and Welch, Timothy, Megaregions, Prosperity and Sustainability. Spatial Planning for Future Prosperity and Sustainability (Regions and Cities). London and New York: Routledge, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Ugo and Di Bella, Arturo, “Start-up Urbanism: New York, Rio de Janeiro and the Global Urbanization of Technology Based Companies”. Environment and Planning A, 49:5 (2017), 999–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydin, Yvonne, The Future of Planning: Beyond Growth Dependence. Bristol: University of Bristol Policy Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, Saskia, Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Allen J. (ed.), Global City-Regions. Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Allen J., Social Economy of the Metropolis: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the Global Resurgence of Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secchi, Bernardo, La città dei ricchi e la città dei poveri. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, Edward W., Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E., The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers our Future. New York: Norton & C., 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Peter, World City Networks. A Global Urban Analysis. London and New York: Routledge, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Peter, Extraordinary Cities. Millennia of Moral Syndromes, World-System and City/State Relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • URBACT, “Cities Facing the Crisis: Impact and Responses”. [online] http://urbact.eu/files/urbact-cities-facing-crisis-impact-and-responses (2010).

  • Vainer, Carlos, “Mega-Events and the City of Exception: Theoretical Explorations of the Brazilian Experience”. In Gruneau, Richard and Horne, John (eds.), Mega-Events and Globalization. Capital and Spectacle in a Changing World Order. London and New York: Routledge, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitali, Walter (eds.), Un’agenda per le città. Nuove visioni per lo sviluppo urbano. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Mark and Huntoon, Laura, “World’s Fairs and Urban Development. Lisbon and Expo 98”. International Review of Comparative Public Policy 12 (2001): 373–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Mark, “Mega-Events and Legacies: Milan Expo 2015 and the Future Event City”. Territorio 77 (2016), 102–105.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Di Vita .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Di Vita, S. (2018). Towards a Post-crisis Urban Agenda: Learning from Mega-Events. In: Mega-Events and Legacies in Post-Metropolitan Spaces. Mega Event Planning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67768-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67768-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67767-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67768-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics